The three-star tv, which cost nearly $9,000, is broken after the quality assurance tv screen, and the new screen is 3,000 different. Change it, it's not worth the money; change it, it's a setup. Mr. Lee is hard to accept for high-priced tv screens, and a new screen would be better。
The tv screen is broken
Yesterday, mr. Lee called the chinese journal of commerce, today's poo-chicken, stating that he had bought a 46-inch three-star lcd television in early 2012, which cost 8,900 more than $23,000 more than similar national television。
On 12 december last year, white lines began to appear on the television screen of mr. Lee's house, which was cloudy and ill-reading. Mr. Lee then called samsung television and then sold the telephone, hoping that it could be repaired。
The following day, after the sale, the staff member came to the door and checked, indicating that the television screen was broken, but that it could not be repaired and replaced because it was a high-end liquid crystal screen. Mr. Lee's television was just under warranty and required mr. Lee to replace an original screen with a labour fee of $3450。
Mr. Lee was surprised to hear that offer, and he felt that it was too high. “television has been in place for more than three years, and the screen has been broken after the quality assurance period, and the switch is too expensive, so it becomes a setup.” mr. Lee said that the cost of changing the screen would be better than simply buying a new television. The screen was not artificially damaged and he could not accept changing it at such a high price。
The manufacturer agreed to give the consumption the appropriate discount
In response, the china business journalist contacted the tristar tv chicken service centre, where staff told the press that the television was set up for a period of one year and the screen for a period of three years, in accordance with the three packages. Mr. Lee's television had passed the quality assurance period, after which staff members had come to the door for testing, and since the television he had purchased was a high-end liquid crystal screen, it was not possible to dismantle and repair it and had to replace it. However, mr. Lee's change of screen was unacceptable, and negotiations are ongoing between the two parties to reduce the cost of the application for “replacement of screens” under the “excessive warranty period”, which was eventually reduced to $2,000, and to replace mr. Lee's new television screen。
In response, the chinese businessman journalist consulted with master wang, who said that electronics were being updated relatively quickly, that the lcd screen was on the market around 2008 and that, although the lcd screen was not running at a very high rate of loss and repair, if the screen was broken and replaced at a higher cost, the maintenance master often advised the customer to repurchase the television。
The china business journalist learned from the consumer rights protection section of the poo-chicken city chamber of commerce and industry that there are currently no uniform domestic standards for the price of changing television screens, which are set by manufacturers. Mr. Lee's television did pass the quality assurance period and the price of replacing the screen would need to be negotiated after sale. A reporter from the chinese commercial news
