On march 14th, at 11 p. M., i was standing at the entrance to the examination and watching the wave coming out, and i felt the feeling in my heart that this year's examination was really pushing people in the direction of “sacking”。
When someone comes out of the door, they're groaning directly on the rail: "this year, i was sent away with intelligence." "don't blame yourself for being smart, you don't even know the word "body."。
As soon as the phone opens,#2026 provincial examinationsThe difficulty #, #go-detection fly#, #the retrospect # has been hung up on the heat search, and the comment area is a large “collective psychological diversion site”:
"it's hard, it's falling, it's numb."
The four words appear more frequently than the hf test。
Those two hours were said to have been the fastest 120 minutes of life and to have been cut off by a “stop” sentence from the examining teacher。
How abstract are you going to ask? I was just thinking at the exam: is this the paper that the subject gave to ai, and it was sent to our human examiner
Let's start with measurements。
This year's volume has almost the same surface volume as in previous years, 120 minutes with 120 questions, old mix. But there's a lot of caution inside。
Jiangsuna is “smart” and can open up a single dump。
Before the exam, you reset countless hot spots: new quality productivity, artificial intelligence, low-altitude economy, carbon neutrality, data elements... ... The phrase "smart" appeared in the results, and many people finished reading the subject, with the eyes saying, "are we not in a time?"。
And one of the examiners came out and said, "i really wanted to raise my hand and ask the examiner if the word was wrong." of course, one can only think of the fact that, in reality, there is only one option with a hard skin attached to the “robots” that interacts with the “human machine”, with the words “see the fate”。
It's not slow. It's starting to get interdisciplinary。
The dowford's "two yellow-sweet willows, a line of white tweeds" were dragged into the mathematical world by the hard-boiled, allowing you to count "the same probability as the sound mother" in 14 words。
In a roll, the language teacher was silent, the math teacher was crying, and the examiner was directly protected。
There was a girl who described her state of affairs: "i wrote a chinese word on the draft paper, and i wrote it to the sound mother in the ring, and suddenly realized that i was teaching dov mathematics at the civil service exam."
It's the sioux super barbecue。
A bottom-up team, sponsored by a barbeque shop, came out of this accident and asked you, "is this city marketing?"
A lot of people have looked at the material, and one thought is: "how does this look like a marketing thing? Half a day, just pick one。
"now i just want to ask if the barbeque can still beat up the workers? I'd love to be the voice of the city."
Smile, smile, smile。
The topic of ecological conservation, which seems to be a problem, is actually a problem. The last sentence, “the preservation of the natural and ecological environment, like the protection of the eyes, by adhering to a predominantly economic, technological and manual approach”, is no longer ripen, and the first sentence is a dead end。
The term “protection priorities” has been quietly replaced by “economic priorities”, and the term “natural recovery” has been replaced by the term “man-made recovery priorities”, with a good look and a complete error. And there was a recollection: "i saw "protecting the environment like an eye," and the whole human condition was retrospect, and it didn't look at the first sentence, and now i just want to slap myself."
Words understand and judge reasoning, let alone。
This year, a number of provinces have been playing "read-rate violence":
Long and long, each of the four options can speak for itself. Read it more and say, "isn't that a good point?" logic fill-ups are all the more choreographed, and they do not stand up to the question-maker's question, “each of which is compatible, but only one of which is most appropriate”。
On this side of the reasoning, the figure pushes a lot of people to “disappear”。
The question of the “five constellation position reasoning” was also raised, and the first reaction to the problem was not reasoning, but: “what is missing in my life is not logic, but knowledge of the constellation”. Who would have thought before the exam that a civil servant would have to study the 12 constellations
To be honest, this year's dilemma is not difficult to come up with, but rather the whole story is twisted on the “backtrack, re-understanding, puzzled mind”. You know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you。
You think you can take a breath after the test
Think too much。
This year's argument, the most solid point is that the word “reverse” is written behind every question。
First of all, you've had a hard morning at the sioux super barbecue. In the afternoon, the argument would extend to city marketing, local branding, and integration of literature. And it turns out that there's nothing in the material, and it's like, "you think that's what i want?"
The big "a" article goes right up to four words:
“branding, standards, chinese modernization, quality development”。
A lot of people saw the moment, and their hearts were empty。
I was told, "i think first of all, how the brand leads to high-quality development, and then i think that the standard is a high-quality foundation, and then it turns out that it's not much of a chinese modernization; and then i just end up with four words in a string of words, and i push up on the `new development paradigm' and write it like an `official message' that i don't believe
This year's talk about a clear signal is that there's no magic of “plus points” in the eyes of viewers。
And if you're still there, “in the course of the current process, there's the following question: first, second, third,” and it looks like it's just a template
It is not just a big essay, but the general questions, the policy questions, the applied texts, as a whole, also rely on “practical” and “postership”。
Different volumes, the content clearly opens the gap:
The provincial and municipal rolls put you up, talking about brand systems, standard-building, modernization processes, regional economic synergy, etc., and the sort of information that you have to put in the material into a logical chain
(a) more localism, grass-roots governance, rural renewal, livelihood services, much of the material is the work that you might actually encounter later
The law enforcement volume is simply directed to “law enforcement norms, emotional response, writing”, giving you a picture of what you want to do and what you want to do。
In the words of the examiner: “this is not an examination, it is a test of whether you can work directly.”
Interestingly, this year, when many people came out, they didn't care much about their writings, but asked their friends, "did you write all four words into the structure?" it also represents a change of direction。
The question arises: what does this mean for candidates
To begin with, the cold reality is that the public statistics are there, with the 23 provincial entrance examinations, which are planned to recruit approximately 1259 million people, with more than 5. 86 million applicants, with an average of approximately 47 to 1, and some hot jobs going straight to 90 to 1。
In this context, the task force has chosen to make it more difficult to break up the circuits and, to some extent, to “sift out those who really fit the job”。
I've been watching the exam for yearsThemeal trendsLook, there's a clear feeling:
The line is moving towards "anti-tactics" and the theory is moving towards "anti-tempo"。
Over there, the speed of a simple brushing is becoming more limited; on the side of the theory, there is no stability in the “how to write a paper”. What matters more is whether you have a cumulative reading, a real understanding of policy orientation, or a logical basis for thinking。
This sounds a little edifice, especially for those who have worked hard to brush tens of thousands of questions and copy several texts of the doctrine. But from another perspective, it is more equitable:
When the “impersonation template” is no longer fragrance, those who are general-based, but who are practical and genuinely willing to drill the material have a better chance of breaking through。
Besides the difficulty。
One crucial point must be borne in mind: hard, it applies to everyone。
The abstractness of the papers will not strengthen you alone. What does that mean? It means that it is impossible to ignore this difficulty or to go up as usual。
For most of the students who are carefully prepared, the most unnecessary now is the “self-denial reset”. The idea of "i'm not fit to take the exam" and "i'm learning for nothing" is really unnecessary。
I'd like to say a fair word for you:
On the day of 14 march, the possibility of climbing from the bed, entering the examination with pressure, sitting all day in good faith, failing to hand over the papers in advance, and failing to lay down the doctrine was in itself a difficult proposition。
I'd like to put my perspective up a little bit。
A lot of people are trying to save their exams, but they don't really say, "i'm going to give myself a chance to flip." there are people from small cities who cross over from outside the system for several years and come back for stability, and people who look to their families and do not want to disappoint their parents。
This year's volume has indeed wiped out a lot of people's sense of security。
People walk out of the exam room and they don't even want to say a word. They just want to find a corner where they can open up the delivery software and order a cup of sweet, hairy milk tea. "don't tell me about my experience. I'll be a loser today."
But when it's over, the places you think you're gonna be "fly" with the rolls are usually the ones you really need to fill。
For example:
You'll find that when you're done with the logical technique, you get to the exam, you slow down, and the whole rhythm goes down
You'll find that the theory is based on a one-size-fits-all sentence and that it's a combination of "brands, standards, china-modernity, high-quality development" and that it's empty
And you'll find that it's still easy to be deceived by the ecological question of "stealing the beam for pillars."。
These findings were cruel, cruel and lucky. At least in 2026, it struck you with an alarm, not when you actually went into the system, wrote materials, made reports, answered people's calls, and found that you were not fully equipped。
Talk to yourself。
If you're the candidate for this provincial exam, whether you're painting the video now or trying to flip the answers, i would like to say a few words:
First of all, it's not just that you think it's too difficult, but it's basically been done. The fraction line is bound to follow the overall situation down a little bit, and you're scaring yourself with the fraction line of the previous year。
Second, you've been ahead of a large number of “scrambling” candidates, who are ready for the exam for a few months, and who are ready to enter the exam on that day and write the last one, and who don't go halfway. Don't underestimate this enforcement, which will be used on any road。
Thirdly, there's no shame in being unsuccessful. Whose approach to the examination is not from "a fog" to "a slow up"? And then you look back, and this year's "smart," it's probably going to be the opening phrase you're bragging about: "i was skeptical by a word i never heard."
If you're going to come back next year, now you've got a very similar "problem":
The exercise is not just a set of questions, but the speed, information extraction, trade-offs
Rather than copying templates on the internet, the doctrine learned to “grow points, find logic, write words” from the material。
The most important one is mentality。
It's never easy, never fast. But every time you turn around in front of such a difficult volume, you're giving yourself a base。
In 2026, the provincial exam was completed。
Next, the problems of disquieting the anxiety, waiting for the announcement, preparing for an interview and changing the posts in the province will gradually surface. But whatever the outcome, you can at least say to yourself:
"that day, i didn't run."
What about you? What's the worst hit this time? Is it the smart question, or dov's probabilities, or the barbeque-sponsored city marketing
You can give it a nickname in your heart, and when you tell your friends, you might already laugh。
