It's been a few days since the national exam, and the discussion of the doctrine hasn't cooled. The biggest difference between this year's essay and previous years, according to the candidates, is that we have to put all the material together to find something in common. No wonder a lot of people call it "wrong."
This yearThe national examinationOnce the exam was completed, many of the candidates threw up harder than they had in previous years, especially in writing. The candidates recalled that most of their previous writings were directed towards a single material, but this year they asked that all given material be analysed and that points of convergence be identified。
This change simply does not work on a back template or a set of paths, and it is not a star and a half for our candidates to be able to combine and think。
Sub-provincial papers: "looking for solutions, managing relationships."
It was recalled that at the heart of the post-provincial essay was that “the relationship between the different factors is managed by the appropriate rules in order to make things sustainable”. It's simple to say, but it's a university question that needs to be argued and systematically thought。
According to the tester's recollection, the test papers gave four pieces of material that couldn't be hit by a pole:
- city h runs urban lights, balancing good landscapes, power savings and citizens ' convenience
- there is a manufacturing enterprise that is struggling with traditional processes in order to balance innovation with old-fashioned practices
- transformation of the town of gobi with a balance between ecological protection and economic development
- d county management of family-type old-age institutions, with proper rules and human conditions。
Don't look at these cases as a stick, one at the core: when it comes to complicated things, you have to find a way to rationalize relationships before you go far。
It's hard to write. You need to understand the bottom logic
This is a question of whether the most basic philosophical thinking is that of communication and contradictory analysis. It can also be seen that the ncp is no longer a mere “acting on business” test, but rather one that depends on whether you can prioritize, balance interests in complex situations and come up with a balanced approach。
These four cases, as the candidates recall, actually give four “thoughts”:
- city h: the core is “balanced”
- enterprise retention: the key is to “carry over” innovation
- the transformation of small towns: “by local conditions”
- management of old-age institutions: “sweetly”。
All we're going to do is to extract from these concrete examples a common “relationship approach” and actually say how they work in different areas。
Focus! What are you gonna do about the future
It is clear from this year's thematic trend that the travaux préparatoires can no longer be limited to “observing a problem” and need to practice systemic and dialectical thinking. Here are a few concrete suggestions:
1. Not just one field of study, but a logic of convergence in different materials
To learn a little about the foundations of marxist philosophy, such as the concept of connection, the concept of development, the method of contradictory analysis, which is really useful
3. Take a closer look at the real cases of national governance, especially those that strike a balance between multiple interests and objectives
4. Practice in writing with light-filled materials, arguments, emphasis on logic and depth。
The fact that the subject changed shows that the nature of the exam is different -- it's not about how much you remember, it's about whether you have a combination of knowledge and think. This is not only a response to the examination, but also an essential capacity to engage in national governance in the future。
The orientation of the young partners who were ready for the 2026 examination is clear: stop staring at a single material and find a common logic; stop looking at surface problems and try to solve them systematically. Even if it was not an ideal examination, it would have been possible to develop such a mental ability, and it would have been more detailed to work and life。
