Reporter hung huai-fung
“does the elevators in our neighbourhood either fail to close the doors or suddenly fall and show the property that it has not been resolved many times?” over the years, the owners of the botai riverside subsector of the southern changhong valley have repeatedly reported to this newspaper that the escalator in the subsector has not passed the annual check-up and has been working “with illness” and that they risk their lives daily to take the lift。
Talk
Elevator's on "thunder."
Ms. Zhou, who lives in two buildings on the coast of botai river, told journalists that the sub-districts are 32-storey buildings, with three units, a, b and c. The elevators have been in use for 10 years, often with doors closed and suddenly falling。
Ms. Zhou recalled that once she came downstairs, the elevator suddenly went down from the 19th floor to the 7th floor and then stopped; again, the elevator was suddenly completely dark, all the keys failed and she was frightened。
One of the owners of the unit with ms. Zhou also told journalists that he had experienced elevator failure, mainly because the elevator doors were not closed and had been calling the police, which was alarming。
Ms. Zhou said that it was most excessive that, after the spring festival, an elevator in unit c had broken down, mainly because the wire had to be replaced for a long time, and as a result it had taken more than 20 days to repair, causing the owners to suffer。
“before 2013, there were no problems with the sector elevators, which, starting in 2014, were not functioning from time to time and appeared to be a little frequent in 2015 and 2016. Ms. Von wirtschaftsprüfer said that every day in the elevator, it was a panic。
The truth
Run without an annual checkup
In an interview with the botai riverside district, journalists also found that many elevators did not display the annual inspection clearance sign in a visible location — according to which the subject was placed. Document no. 29 and the jiangxi province regulation on the safety surveillance of special equipment, which require the display in the elevator of signs such as “safety checks qualified” and “safeguard information on the transport”。
In response, the property — and a zhou chief of the thai property industry — introduced the journalists to the security procedures for the elevators in the district。
“the property industry is lying, there is no security check, and the elevators in the sector have been working `with disease'. In fact, the elevator, which was due to undergo an annual inspection in december last year, has not yet passed an annual inspection and has even been notified by the nanchang municipal market and quality control authority of its overhaul, and has been fined $10,000.” informed sources have told journalists that the botai riverside elevator has been in operation since 2006 and that frequent failures should be due to the ageing of spare parts。
This statement was confirmed in a subsequent interview with the nanchang market and quality monitoring authority. One of the officers in charge of the special equipment inspection unit of the department stated that the elevator in the botai riverside sector did not pass the annual inspection. There are 15 elevators in the sector, which have been in operation since 2006 and have now reached the point of major repairs for 10 years. In the absence of an annual check-up, they issued a rectification notice for the small area property in february and again in april of this year, asking the property to fix the elevators with frequent failure, but the other party has not。
Challenge
Property says it's hard to accept money
Why don't you give the elevator a medical treatment, knowing that it's working with a disease? "more than that." according to the director of thai property week, they had planned to repair the elevators in the sector last year, but had estimated the cost of repairing them at between $80,000 and $100,000 each and between $1. 2 million and $1. 5 million for 15 elevators. “this large sum of money, which the property could not afford at all, was intended to be used by the public maintenance fund, but the sub-districts did not have an owner's committee and did not meet the conditions for using the public maintenance fund.” zhou said。
In response, mr. Liu, the small-area owner, said that while there had been a genuine attempt to apply for a maintenance fund in the past year, the property had been strongly questioned and opposed by a large number of owners because of the forgery of the owner's signature, the lack of prior disclosure of applications for the use of details, the non-acceptance of owner's supervision, the fact that the cost of maintenance was a “nod” figure, and the suspicion that the maintenance fund had been set up。
Mr. Liu said that the revenue from public advertising and public parking spaces in the subdistricts for so many years had been collected by the property, never communicated to the owner, and that the cost was owned by the owner as a whole, that it should be used as a priority to supplement the public maintenance fund and that the property should be disclosed to the owner. Moreover, the property fees paid by the owners already include the cost of annual elevator checks and daily maintenance。
The journalists learned from the nanchang city housing authority that there are rules for the establishment and approval of a public maintenance fund, such as “the establishment of an owner's committee in the district”, “the signature of an owner with a exclusive share of more than two thirds of the building's total area and more than two thirds of the total”, but not because they disregard the owner's life. Botaijiamam could simply issue a notice through the community house council or the property industry that the owner could sign up and give the owner's consent to remove the maintenance fund and use it for the maintenance of the elevator。
Progress
The local council sent a letter asking the property industry to conduct an annual elevator inspection as soon as possible
“we attach great importance to the frequent failure of the botai riverside elevator and are very concerned about the lives of the owners of the bailiwick.” the head of the rainbow community home office of the new shani street office of red valley beach informed journalists that it was a fact that there was currently no owner committee in the botai riverside sub-district, that the public maintenance fund was the money of the owner, that the right of use was vested in the owner and that the community did not have the power to make use of the maintenance fund, but that if the sub-district did need to apply for the maintenance fund, it would be subject to the public and transparent supervision of all owners, in accordance with the rules of the law, as long as the property application for use of the maintenance fund was made in accordance with the rules。
Correspondingly, there is no business committee in a small district of the rainbow community, and the application process is legally open and transparent and the maintenance fund has been drawn up with the supervision of a large number of owners。
The director told journalists that the community had reported to the shaai street office and its superior authorities for security problems related to the failure of the botai riverside elevator to pass annual inspections and frequent failures. The shaai street office attaches great importance to the requirement for timely written correspondence from the community and the thai property industry, as well as for the property industry to effectively assume responsibility for the annual inspection and safe use of elevators and to apply for the maintenance fund in accordance with the law, subject to the supervision of a large number of owners。
On 8 december, the rainbow community home board issued a letter requesting and the thai property industry to ensure the annual inspection and safe operation of the sector elevators in accordance with the property service requirements. Applications for the use of maintenance funds are conducted strictly in accordance with the law and in accordance with the procedures established by the government, and are subject to public and transparent supervision by a wide range of owners。
