The high court volunteered to fill in, and it was disputed as a diversion for regular programmes。
Unlike in the past, this year's spear pointed at itJournalismProfessional。
The reason for this is that mr. Zhang zhang zhou feng is amazing: “the child must report journalism and i will knock him out.”。
It's scary, it's scary, it's scary, it's scary。
Is it really that bad? What's the point
I don't think it has anything to do with the news department itself. It's not that the news department has no futureHigher educationThere has been a serious disconnect with society, especially in the subject of history。
They're professors, scholars, and they're living in a planning economy and teaching them how to adaptMarket economyI don't know。
So the paradox emerged:
Zhang zhang zhang zhen feng cannot question the professor's fanship, and the professor's response is that “it's useless, it's better to have an authoritative journal than the fanship
Not to mention the question of the authority of authoritative journals, and if i count on that, i can say with certainty that the vast majority of journalism students are starving。
Because there's a couple of journalism students who have access to the system or newspapers
It's so tiny
More people can and can only work in private enterprises, then do editing, run new media, or write。
Does school teach that stuff? Yes, but it's no doubt limited
After all, using the experience of authoritative journals to package short videos and new media seems to be a bad idea, which is destined for the tragic ending of most journalism graduates。
In addition, according to feedback from friends in the journalism profession, they face a serious problem:
Although they graduate in journalism, they do not necessarily write journalism。
To be clear, they're going to interview the big deal in medicine, biology and so on, and they probably don't know what to ask and how to start - because there's a gap in expertise
As a result, many media outlets are now less interested in journalism graduates and prefer to use cross-professional writers as journalists, whose interviews and contributions are of higher quality than journalism graduates。
Just say it's awkward
It is for one reason or another that the moat of journalism is virtually gone:
You can write, you can write; you can't write, you can write! It's in the media. Professors don't know much about this, they start from scratch。
What college did you go to
This is not to say that other professions do not exist, but it is relatively much better。
Leaving aside the undergraduate level, there is value in entering the fields of master's and doctor's studies, such as science and technology。
Even a lot of experiments can be turned into economic benefits。
How's journalism
Not to say that the journalism profession could not do that, but to say that there was a bias in direction and that there had been a deviation for years。
Professors are responsible only for authoritative periodicals and not for market economy activities, and students are responsible for employment and income, which is the outcome。
In other words, if a professor at the university level can build up hundreds of thousands of fans when he graduates, do you think anyone else says journalism is a pit? It's definitely gone
Many people may have to go in on their knees, because to do so, they can easily generate income in their spare time。
Anyway, after all this, i'd like to conclude with mr. Zhang's words:
“if a teacher who specializes in journalism, he does not attend classes, writes without reading, and has few fans。
Excuse me, does he really know how to communicate? Will it really lead students to learn and survive in society?"
It's a matter of all journalism, and it's worth our thinking
