Combining “close and unheeded” and “effectively managed” (both ideological and vertical)
At the five plenary sessions of the 20th session of the central disciplinary commission, the secretary-general of xi jinping stated that: “continuing power in the institutional cage, while continuously improving the institutional provisions to keep the system compact and functioning effectively, and investing in institutional implementation to enhance rigidity.” the “close and unsatisfied” focus on the science of system design and the “effective management” focus on the vitality of system implementation, the harmonization of the governance practice of “confining power in the institutional cage” is key to breaking formalism in institution-building and enhancing the overall effectiveness of the system. The secretary-general xi’s important statement has revealed the core thrusts and underlying patterns of institution-building, and has provided a clear way forward and a fundamental follow-up to the promotion of institutional governance。
The term “close” refers to the rigour and thoroughness of the system, which is both a prerequisite and a cornerstone of its effectiveness. The institutional, supervisory and supervisory authorities must focus on the priorities of the governing bodies, the managerial staff, especially the “first-hand” and key posts, around the whole process of delegation of authority, tenure and authority, and on important matters such as policy development, project approval, allocation of funds, selection of people, ensuring that the main subjects, content and procedures for the exercise of power are well regulated. In addition to being reflected in the coverage dimension of the system, “close” imposes important requirements on the structure of its design. It is only through systems that are interconnected and mutually supportive and that provide a coherent and well-connected monitoring network that blind districts can be eliminated and power abuse effectively curbed。
“unpleasible”, emphasizing the simplicity and feasibility of the system, with a focus on targeting and guidance. What is “unpleasive” is that the necessary rules are in place to achieve effective and rigorous discipline. If the provisions are lengthy and detached from practice and do not play the normative role of the regime, they also undermine its prestige by making it difficult to grasp and dissatisfied with the practitioners. General secretary xi stressed that “whatever system is established and perfected, it is based on the principle of procrastination and simplicity” and pointed out the main meaning of “closeness”. Among them, at the heart of law zhuong lies a web of “close”, woven systems that integrate, synergetic and efficient systems; the key to simplicity lies in “simple”, removing redundancies and redundancies, and ensuring that the system is viable, works and works。
The value of the system is ultimately tested by practice. “effective governance” is the functional measure of the operation of the system, demonstrating a high degree of uniformity between its implementation and effectiveness. The effectiveness of the system depends on its being comprehensible, operational and, in practice, translated into governance effectiveness. Whether the system works or not depends on real solutions, risk prevention and the achievement of objectives. A good system that can respond to the symptoms and effectively address the salient problems that have been revealed; it can be more positive, by filling gaps through institutional innovations, and by effectively preventing the problem from rebounding and addressing both symptoms and symptoms。
“clusterity” and “effective governance” complement and reinforce each other. “screeching” is a prerequisite for and a path towards “effective governance”, which is the standard and the point of entry to test the effectiveness of “quickness”. For example, the regulation on internal oversight of the communist party of china (cpc) reflects a concise and specific character. For example, it specifies that party oversight must be strengthened by strengthening oversight of the principals of party organizations and the cadres in key positions, and that it can be easily implemented in areas that are clearly focused on, inter alia, political positions, implementation of party resolutions, selection of people, etc. It is not a stand-alone text, but rather a systematic system of intra-party monitoring through a combination of a number of party regulations and normative documents, such as disciplinary regulations, inspection work regulations and accountability regulations。
The system must be constantly tested in practice, maintaining a dynamic resonance with the needs of the times and practice. It is therefore a dynamic and development balance that is not complex and effective. There is a need to focus on risk points for the functioning of power, weaknesses in oversight and management, key points of vulnerability to corruption, and to elaborate institutional norms to address emerging issues. A “big article” that is systematic and collaborative, adapts and updates out-of-date content in a timely manner, and promotes effective links between monitoring of authority and selection of cadres, appraisals, etc. In keeping with modern trends in scientific and technological development, the system's requirements are embedded deeply in the information process of power operation, leading to dynamic early warning, intelligent surveillance, and technological empowerment to enhance the rigidity and effectiveness of system implementation. To ensure that the institutional system is dynamic and strong, through continuous optimization of institutional provisions, and to provide strong institutional guarantees for a fully accountable party. (lu jie)
Daily people's journal (version 17, 05/03, 2026)
