In recent years, it's known as the social windPress reviewA number of new changes have taken place, one of which is the convergence of the “face” and “temperature” of the reviews of the party newspapers and of the urban newspapers, which learn from and learn from each other。
The academic community and industry may need to think carefully and answer the question: what is the meaning of the commentary。
Previously, mibois, a well-known commentator and former deputy editor-in-chief of the people's daily newspaper, published a new edition of the revue's field course, which drew attention. The book is known as “a review of its experience in journalism and journalism education, a systematization of the theory of news commentary, which sets out the basic philosophy of news commentary and covers the key elements of the commentary business, and combines exemplary and award-winning work with the views and positions of party newspaper commentators, a panorama presenting the inherent patterns and external techniques of review writing, helping to inspire critical thinking and fostering correct, fair and rational commentary
As a senior commentator, mibois looked at the change and direction of the review, and he was invited to talk about it at the time。
Mibois
Queen's tea guest:
Mibois: famous commentator, former deputy editor-in-chief of the people's daily newspaper, " the war of news review " , etc
Quinton tea host:
Kung-gung: president of the think tank, commentator
Hd: since the 1970s and 1980s, you have been working on news reviews, and what have been the changes in media reviews over the years? What changes have occurred, particularly in the internet age
Mibois: as you have said, it's been almost 40 years of comment. You don't have to say "do what you want," but it's "work" and it's your own business. For 40 years, the change in the news commentary has been positive. It's just a big change, it's hard to imagine. It's like paying from paper notes to electronic payments, the purpose of the money remains the same, but the currency is almost rare and the way it is bought and consumed has changed. As you can see, the commentary continues to judge, analyse and draw conclusions about news events and figures. Speaking of change, i think there are a few:
First, the comments are no longer exclusive to professionals, but are directed towards the general public. People write, people see, people participate in the discussion。
Secondly, the published positions are no longer exclusive to a few, breaking the publication threshold. If you like, open the column (public) and “poster”, as you wish。
Thirdly, words represent you only, not tied to an organization. Within the limits of the law, a higher authority is not required to review the draft。
Fourth, the subject matter is extensive, without formal requirements, long or short. The soup of the heart, the current state of affairs, the art philosophy, the law, the medicine, emotional distress, love guidance, etc. You can comment as much as you like。
Of course, i am most surprised at the emergence of too many commentators who are open-minded, knowledgeable and well-written. It is not known where they all came from. I would like to say that there is a short sense of heroism even in the “old world” that we have been commenting for decades. Self-righteousness, standing in this line, regardless of its width, breadth, depth or strength, has its strength, shame or envy, but it has its heart。
Hd: what changes have been made in the understanding of the comments you have been working in the party newspapers, in journalism teaching at universities in the past few years
Mibois: i went to college to teach, and i wanted to do a job and give a lecture. However, several review sessions were held, but they were dismissed。
First of all, these university teachers spoke quite well. For the authors of the commentary, i “know, know”. I would choose the subject, write, but why it is written instead, never thought about. I learned more about “why” when teachers at the college lecture。
Second, i am familiar only with newspaper reviews, especially editorials, editorial articles, standard official texts, and with online commentary from the media, especially the internet. It's hard to tell the students about the old calendars. The first is that the current commentary is no longer particularly pedestal, and that poetry, rhetoric, verbs, etc. Are becoming less and less. Often, there is a high-profile and straightforward expression, with fewer transfers, shoes and hats. The second is the current commentary text, images, background music, live broadcasts. So, the commentators now have an infectious mouth, perhaps more fashionable than the exact words, and more popular intuitive than steel logic. Quite frankly, it is a parable to hear, to hear, and to cut away. Hear, and praise. Some are serious, many need not be true, and this is about the ecological nature of today's commentary。
Hd: you mentioned in the `news review practice' sequence that “the most lacking of the material in the press review type is the editorial practice”. From “writing comments” to “teaching comments”, how can the problem of “torture” be solved
Mibois: i did not write "press review practice " , which was not written as a textbook, but rather recorded my practical experience. Frankly, while the media has flourished and flourished, it is indeed mixed. If there is any pain in the field, i think it is most important that there are almost no real contacts with the mainstream and authoritative media. Just as a study calligraphy must be submitted, either for the sake of the "two kings" or for the sake of a teacher, the "yang yan". If there is no formal training, it's well written, and it's so popular; it's so much written that it's still “funnel”。
It is much easier to publish a personal sentiment than to describe current policy; to write without too much concern is much easier than to write with responsibility; and to write with no major flaws is much easier than writing with very precise precision。
If i speak about the substantive lessons, the idea is to correct the shortcomings of the “gang and lake” from the outset, in accordance with professional standards, as in the case of the training of professional athletes, one move must be put in place precisely. That's basic. The basic work is done, and the next self-selection can be higher。
Hd: what are your most impressive commentators and commentators in the history of press reviews
Mibois: i found almost all the books and works i could find in this area because of my work of commenting. I don't know foreign languages, so i rarely get to the work of foreign commentators. Even the famous lipman, i see only a biography, and i do not see a translation。
For centuries, the history of press reviews has been accompanied by a change in the times of china, with many representatives. However, there are two broad categories: the so-called civil government of intellectuals, such as zhang zhiqiang, hu zheng zhiqing, zhu zhu zheng zhiqi, zhu zhu zhu zhiqi, zhu zhu zhu zheng zhu, zhu zhu zhu, zhu zhu zhu, zhu zhu zheng zhu, zhu zhu zhu, zhu zhu zhu, zhu zhu zhu zhu, zhu zhu zhu zhu, zhu zhu zhu, zhu zhu zhu zhu, zhu zhu zhu zhu, zhu zhu zhu, zhu zhu zhu, zhu zhu, zhu zhu zhu, zhu zhu, zhu zhu zhu zhu, one group is a professional revolutionary and propagandist, such as chen xiu su, li dae-hwan, mao zedong and deng xiaoqiao. When i was a young man, i preferred to be a man of the kind, and i used to be a man of the word, a man of the word, a man of the word. At a younger age, especially after a certain period of experience, i prefer the articles of professional revolutionaries, especially the comments of comrade mao. It is not only the mao zedong review that created the legal framework for our party newspaper commentary, from the methods of thought, language-formulation to the drafting style, which opened up a new frontier of white language. Even more so, professional revolutionaries seem bound not to write for writing, but to be accompanied by a difficult struggle, even a bloodbath test, in writing, so that the life tension contained therein is completely different。
From this point forward, i seem to prefer the work of the scribes cao cao and zhu liang. Mr. Konming's " show of the masters " , " the air is pounding " , and " lun-un " has a broad vision. This must not be written in the book. There is a professional revolutionary political theory, which is rarely mentioned as lenin. Ten years ago, when he visited russia, he accidentally collected some of lenin's news reviews and found that lenin's comments were highly intelligent, unattainable, theoretical, prescriptive, policy, work, combative. Unfortunately, there is little domestic research in this area。
Hd: have you had any impressive comments since the outbreak? What are the changes in these comments compared to those of the sars period
Mibois: it's been 20 years since the "sars". If sars is a short and partial shock, this is a long and extensive suffering. Moreover, in china 20 years ago, the combined national power and international influence were far from comparable today。
The epidemic is taking place against the backdrop of a “hundredth-year change” in which the power of the great powers has been accentuated by a strong playing field that has led to a global public war. If the east-west cultural conflict is intense, the blood nozzles around a small mask; the stakes are different, money or death, and full-blown. I have also noted that it is difficult to bridge the social divide between east and west, within and outside the country, across sectors and groups. The same is true of online commentary, which is not uniform。
The commentary is a true reflection of social life, profound changes in the international political and economic landscape and extensive adjustments in domestic interests that inevitably lead to impatience。
What is the most important concern of professional journalism in the era of “everyone has a microphone”
Mibois, "everyone has a microphone," as if everyone could sing k. The opera hall is free, but there are thresholds for performing at the national theatre. There is no automatic link between volume and authority, nor is there a necessary link between volume and impact. In that sense, everyone is not the same as mainstream authority. The russian-uu conflict, for example, has a variety of voices on the internet, but the international community still cares about the voice of the chinese government and the comments of chinese officials。
We are already familiar with the excitement of “wheat” for all, and we must listen to it from the excitement, and let alone look at it as a matter of emotion. At the same time, it is hoped that professional commentators will have to read and study the comments of the party newspaper and study current affairs policy, otherwise they will not be able to understand a complete china。
Smart courage: what are the problems faced by a number of media or new media in shaping the "opportunist ip" as they move from behind the scene to the front desk
Mibois: it's not a new attempt to build a commentator's “ip”, but a column and a commentator. The question is how to reach a wider audience. The "focus interview" on “truth-to-speech” was launched in the last century and a group of excellent facilitators was launched. New media are no exception, and this is a pattern of news dissemination. In contrast, the new media “ip” requires a more comprehensive quality and a more visible feature。
First, a high-level professional team, planning, packaging, technical security, broadcasting arrangements, etc., is very high。
Second, there is a good understanding of the spirit above and the demands of the people, both of which are the temples and the rivers。
Thirdly, in the audience, people with excellent eyes and mouths are more popular, with high-profile, well-structured, funny styles... Not the style of a broadcaster, but the kind of mature, steady and wise. There are very few of them。
In addition, such a person would have to be skinned, with a strong heart, able to take a blow, able to take a bull's-eye and be overrated, without which it would be difficult to do well。
Hd: what would you recommend if you were to recommend three books for students or young commentators interested in writing in journalism
Mibois: it's a little hard to recommend three books to school children, because i like too many books, so let's say, three。
Category i, external philosophy. Smart human beings reach the level of wisdom that is not philosophical. "in the days of heaven and earth, the world has changed." philosophy is the basis for any study of the political, economic, moral and ethical aspects of national society. Without a philosophical framework, it's just a sandstorm; the articles that are written are mostly gossip。
Foreigners from conde, hegel to marx, from sartre, dewey to heidegger. The same applies to china's first qin, sihan, wei jin and tong. The greatest gift from philosophy is not necessarily green trees, but vast forests。
The second category of literature and history. It's too much, not to list it, and i'm going through "song hong mai" again. The dream creek penn, like the pocket queue, is a very durable note. It is written and written and written in history, and it is more important that it be used as a source of understanding, and it has always been for those who govern the country. At the same time, it is very interesting to be heard and to be clear。
The third category of persons, whose biography and memoirs are more numerous, is not listed。
As for the press review profession, it would be useful to flip and read it more effectively than the editorial profession。
Hd: as a senior commentator, i would like to ask you to consider what future comments are. Or what kind of “overtone” would happen over the next 10 years with the content and outreach of the press reviews
Mibois: don't dare say that you're a senior. I thought that news work also included a press review exercise, which might take into account two main contexts。
First of all, the historical dimension of the news in the century change. China will undoubtedly become the centre of international opinion. In the past, we focused more on domestic reporting. For our participation in international affairs is far from sufficient. In the coming years, china's voice will receive greater attention from the international community; its views will be fed into global public opinion. This is due to objective circumstances. It is natural, therefore, that the exchange of public opinion will take place around a clash of western and central cultures and concerns about the interests of the major powers. We need to be fully prepared for this。
Secondly, the value and significance of news reports and commentaries may be redefined as the times evolve. As has been said, we must be accustomed to a complex environment of public opinion in which diversity of opinion is displayed, multi-channel voices are heard and multiple effects are present. Information is not merely a dissemination of information, but may be an integral part of state governance, security control, public life and social services. We are afraid that it will take longer to adapt to changes in public opinion ecology. It is most likely that official and civic voices, mainstream media voices and self-message voices are moving towards a state of separation and integration. In this sense, commentators and good reviews will emerge in large numbers, with more opportunities to demonstrate their fists. I look forward to that with optimism。
