For many years, the fields of deep-tilled digital and human life have found a particularly common phenomenon: when many households see water bills posted at the door of their homes, they panic, fearing that they will become stagnating and cut water, they start to block payments and do not check documentation information carefully。
This small reminder is hidden in many ways, either through false fraudulent documents, water table measurements, miscalculation of historical arrears, or even irregular documents posted over the power of the property, which can easily be paid in vain。
Today, in combination with official water industry cases of real pit-stamping, practical techniques of mobile phone-line verification have been put in place to disassembly a complete and secure process, with legal compliance throughout the process. Ordinary people will look at the collection and remember the collection, and they will never panic again when they encounter water charges。
First of all, we have a clear picture of the current state of the most real industry, where water bills are now posted from various sources, not all from regular water companies. According to an official anti-fraud alert issued by the multi-handwater group, a number of outlaws impersonate water workers and post false reminders in the sub-districts, jump directly to their personal accounts and be defrauded directly after a household sweep。
In addition to this, some of the subdivisions are privately collected and double billed; even second-hand tenants are confronted with the fact that the outstanding charges on the bill are historical bills left by the former landlord and should not be borne by the current tenants, who can easily step on them without being careful。
By reviewing the relevant provisions of the urban water regulations, it is clearly stated that formal water charges must be issued by the territorial water companies, and that the property has no right to individually post water charges or to collect water charges directly, and this is the core legal basis for the receipt of such charges and the failure to pay money at first。
Prior to the formal presentation of the methodology, it was clear to everyone that the blind payment of the bill would probably be subject to these four types of losses, each of which is related to our vital interests。
First, in the case of fraudulent water charges, money is transferred directly to private accounts. The collection account of a regular water company must be a public unit account, while the two-dimensional code on a false reminder form, mostly personal micro-credit and payment of the treasure collection code, makes it difficult to recover the money once it has been cleared, which is also the type of fraud that has been prevalent in recent years。
Second, it covers historical arrears left by former owners. After many second-hand households had entered the house, they had received high water bills, which had been carefully checked and found to have been incurred by the previous owner and which, according to the water regulations, should not have been borne by the current household and paid blindly, amounting to paying for others in vain。
Thirdly, the metering of water is abnormal and the presence of water is more expensive. The leaking of water pipes and water table failure in the home can lead to unusually high water consumption, far exceeding the daily level of service on the bill for direct contributions, amounting to an unreasonable bill for measurement and subsequent advocacy。
Fourth, property irregularities and indiscriminate charges are repeated. Part of the property is self-involved in the collection of second-time water charges and charges for the transfer of additional costs into the water bill, which the household does not pay directly and with knowledge。
Understanding these potential risks will make it clear that it is much more important to receive water billings and check them calmly than rush payments. The four-step approach used by those who know the trade is followed, which is to be broken down and done in a way that avoids risks and allows for compliance with claims。
Step 1: complete retention of the reminder evidence, and do not tear it away at will
Many people's first reaction is to tear out the reminders, without seeing them, which is indeed the worst practice. The correct course of action is to use a mobile phone to film the call from the front and the side, clearly recording all the information on the issuing unit, the user number, the amount of water used, the amount owed, the telephone call, the 2-dimensional code, etc., and to back up the photo to the phone cloudboard and keep the paper file properly。
Retention documents have two key functions: first, to facilitate subsequent official verification of the authenticity of the documents; and second, to provide the most immediate proof in the event of a subsequent dispute. Even if there is a real problem with the document and it is kept in its entirety, it can be justified and, after it has been torn, it is vulnerable to passivity。
Step 2: 30 seconds to quickly identify the authenticity of the documents, and this step is a direct escape from fraud. The pit
This is the most central step, since it is possible to distinguish between true and false at the first glance of the pedestrians, and it is easy for ordinary people to know the details, and three essential points to be summarized in conjunction with the official identification criteria of the water corporation。
First, look at the name of the issuing unit. Formal reminders must be issued by the xx water company, with an official full name; if the document only reads “system property, portable services department” or “water services centre”, without a specific official name, it can be generally determined to be a violation。
Secondly, to see whether the core message is complete. The formal water bill must clearly indicate the user number, the address of the house, the readings of the previous transcript, the readings of the current period, the amount of water used, the unit price, the amount of the total outstanding; false documents are mostly vague, the amount of water used, the user number is missing, only the amount of the outstanding amount is written, and the amount of the fee is directed directly to the sweep。
Thirdly, the collection channels should be checked. A regular water company would only support micro-credit contributions, payment of valuable living contributions, official aps, and offline office contributions, and would not allow households to clean private two-dimensional transfers directly; as long as the bill was a personal receipt number, 100 per cent fraudulent documents and simply ignored。
Step 3: official online checking of billings to confirm the validity of outstanding charges
The next step in identifying the authenticity of the documents is to verify their true water bills, which are not available, which can be done with a mobile phone, which is free of charge, is simple and recommends the two most secure methods of verification。
First, micro-credit/payment of subsistence contributions. By opening up micro-credits or paying treasures, entering the cost of living, choosing water charges, entering their own user numbers, you can see directly real-time arrears, historical bills, monthly quantities of water, billings shown by the system, which are the real costs officially recognized, and the amount of the call for a bill that is not consistent, depending directly on the official system。
Second, call an official local water hotline for verification. Each city has an exclusive water service line, which calls directly, gives a family address and user number, and the client service asks you in real time about the status of your bill, clearly informing you of the existence of a debt, the time of its occurrence, the cause of its occurrence and the simultaneous verification of the authenticity of documents, which is the most authoritative channel of verification。
If, after verification, the bill shows no arrears, it is sufficient to ignore the reminders directly, and if there are arrears, then to proceed to the next norm。
Step 4: discretionary treatment, without loss of water
Once the verification has confirmed the existence of a real liability, it is not necessary to pay the fee directly under the sms, in three rational ways, to protect its rights and interests to the greatest extent possible。
Scenario i: reasonable liability for normal use. Payment is made directly through the official means of credit and payment of contributions, without breaking the two-dimensional code on the bill, keeping a cut-off of contributions and avoiding subsequent double deductions。
Case ii: historical arrears from the used room. The time of the transfer is directly explained to the water company, which is required to verify the attribution of the arrears, which are required to be incurred by the former owner. The water company cannot claim from the current household and can apply for the removal of unreasonable bills。
Scenario iii: unusually high water use and suspected water table failure. Applications are made directly to the water company to check the water table, to check the accuracy of the meter, to ascertain if there are any leaks in the household, to clear the case, to pay reasonable fees and to avoid excessive spending。
After completing the full processing process, you will be asked to clear up some of the errors that must be avoided, many of whom have stepped on the pits in vain。
The first area of error: it panics when you see the delay. According to the provisions relating to water supply, the water company collects late payments, following a formal collection process, without official confirmation of late payments, and the household has the right to refuse to pay them, without being blindly compromised for fear of default。
Second error: oral explanation of light property, direct contribution. The property does not have the official authority to collect water bills, and in the event of a reminder from the property, it must be based on the official system of the water company and not rely on unilateral statements of property。
Third error: delete the reminder photo and do not retain the certificate. The retention of a contribution cut-off and a single reminder photograph, even if a subsequent payment is made, are important evidence of rights defence in the event of a billing dispute。
Fourth area of error: conflict between direct and posted personnel. Reasonable defence of rights is far more effective when false or irregular documents are encountered, without the need for a direct dispute, with direct photo retention and feedback to water companies and the 12345 government hotline。
For many years, deep-tilled digital and human science has been characterized by the feeling that much of the life lost is due to a rush to encounter. A small bill of water charges, which does not seem to exist, is linked to the security of our property, and the way in which pedestrians are dealt with is never an eager compromise, but a check, deal with and avoid risk at its root。
As online government becomes easier, it is the smartest way to easily verify water bills on a mobile phone, without running off-line in a few minutes, to avoid a major pit that protects its own wallet without compromising normal water use。
Do you ever get a water bill in front of your house? Have there been false documents or unreasonable debts? Welcome to sharing your experiences in the comment area, and we share our pit avoidance skills。
