Press dayI'm going to say something to the press
Shinjinko
This post is part of our special coverage global voices 2011. Rowan
Reporter's day, not just a journalist's holiday, but allJournalistsAll “newsmen” festivals. In the 10 days leading up to and following the eleventh chinese voyage in chuhai, journalists from the central media and from all levels of the media were helped, taught and moved. At the same time, in the course of the exchange of work with you, a number of ideas have emerged, which are recorded in these six words, and which, in turn, are the memories of the occasion。
One, hold onNews idealsI don't know. Adherence to marxist journalism, adherence to party and popular positions requires journalists to be committed to their ideals, to their homeland, to their people and to their posts. The national interest encompasses sectoral interests, media interests, journalists ' interests, while sectoral interests, media interests, and journalists ' interests cannot be at the expense of national interests. The relationship between personal interests, media interests, sectoral interests and national interests must not be allowed to dilute patriotism with utilitarianism, individualism, subjectivity and platitude. There was a consensus between me and journalists from the people's daily, the central people's radio and the central television on the air show that our news orientation should be focused on bringing people together, boosting military morale, sending the right signal to the outside world, conveying firm confidence to the inside, bringing together “china's aspirations” among the general public and the chinese abroad, and forming a consensus for a strong country to flourish。
Second, innovative journalism. Maintaining the right message, raising the level of business and improving innovation, was deeply felt in the launch campaign. For example, xinhua and phoenix watch, shenzhen watch, hubei watch, both do “desktop news” and do “menu news” in their minds, sending a rich message and responding to public concerns. I'm talking about: journalists can't just do "desktop news" rather than "menu news" and can't just stare at "menu news" rather than "desktop news"; "menu news" has to make real, tasteful, tasteful, and not be weird, strange, evil. It is important to consider both international and national public opinion forums in an integrated manner, with emphasis on “new wave” and “international communication”, so that the world can hear our chinese voice. The international response to the “china topic” and the international resonance of the “china story” should be maintained, so that the chinese voice can be understood by the international community。
Thirdly, take the news comparison. Is it chinese or foreign wine? Each has its own characteristics, each has its own qualities, and each has its own taste. Is western good or chinese good? Each has its own characteristics, each has its own strength, and every one of you has his own. Journalists are making “international comparisons” to see both the “longer” of foreign countries and the “longer” of china, and the more objective the comparison is, the more rational the press is. Our participation in this exhibition has also given us a deep sense of the importance of not rejecting the flow of people, in the name of the river. Any people, any country, needs to learn from the good civilization of others. China will always be a major learning power, regardless of its level of development, to learn from all the peoples of the world in order to take a more open and inclusive stance and to strengthen mutual accommodation, understanding and communication with all countries of the world。
Four, deepNews spotI don't know. Usually, when a journalist appeared on the news site, he achieved half of the success. I was inspired by central television's focus interview reporter: news events are both “first scene” and “second scene”, they are good at observing “first scene”, they focus on “second scene”, and they seek a deep sense of television news. The observation of the “first scene” is easy, access to the “second site” is not easy, and there is knowledge, knowledge and “public unknown” in the “second site”. Some of the reports at the show also show that sometimes the “first scene” is not necessarily real and objective, and that you may see the “process” as an “outcome” or “the phenomenon” as “essential”, and that journalists need to learn to “see, smell, ask, cut” and that the four actions need to be consistent. Only when “seeing, smelling, asking, cutting” is carried out in depth will it not be clouded by illusions or spread false feelings。
Five, raise news accuracy. More and more “80s and 90s” journalists participated in the show, as a team that was ahead of schedule and able to fight hard. At the same time, however, i also feel that some journalists are hardworking, but lacking rigour and often “frustration”. I've been communicating with journalists, communicating with them, working with public opinion: it's a fine job, a fine job, a fine job, a deep job, a little bit of a “fault-for-learn” and a little bit of a frenziedness. “technology errors” tend to lead to other problems and to reduce “technological errors” to zero. “technology errors” can be avoided, prevented, and to be eliminated, it is essential that we journalists be highly responsible, sensitive and vigilant, that we treat each production chain with great rigour, seriousness and responsibility, that we focus on coordination and coherence in forward production transmissions and later broadcast, and that we avoid “manifest errors” as well as “hidden errors”。
Six, keep the news warm. The day of specialization, which had been closed to children and adolescents, and the hunan youth with leukemia, who thought of the air force's equipment to watch the plane, made every effort to meet the wishes of the child and gave him special courtesy. Read the reports written by the sla newspaper and the pictures of the children watching the plane taken by the comrades, who were infected and had tears in their eyes. However, i agree with the military press that although the pictures of the warplanes are very contagious, we do not disclose them, nor do we appear the true names of the children in the text. While “tweeting” is conducive to mass dissemination, we need to take more humanistic concerns into account in our public opinion work and maintain a minimum level of information. News was visible and, in the face of unfortunate individuals or emergencies, the principle should always be people-centred rather than news-based。
