In recent days, a video entitled “countering the medical costs of pet dogs after bites is too expensive” has attracted attention online. Red star journalists noted that the videos were published by a short video host called the land sliding god, which focused on the medical process, as well as his questioning of the cost of treatment and the projects related to it。
Mr. Wong has published several video clips questioning the "too expensive" online screenshot
On 20 august, in an interview with red star journalists, mr. Huang, the blogger and the video publisher, stated that the purpose of his video was primarily to bring to the attention of the public the question of “excessive medical care” for pets. He is currently waiting to respond to the situation with regard to market regulation, agricultural and rural sectors。
In response, the head of the pet clinic indicated that the medical treatment had been clearly explained to the client at the scene and was normal. Both the number of shots and the number of injections are required for treatment. If the other party still disagrees, it can be reported to a higher authority, which is willing to cooperate with the investigation。
Local regulators responded that the institution's medical procedures were in line with the requirements and procedures. In response to some of the detailed problems in the industry, the department holds regular thematic meetings to identify problems and problems and to request institutional improvements. At the same time, it will further strengthen the direction of self-regulation in the industry, by requiring institutions to be realistic and to fulfil their obligation to inform and by requiring practitioners to exercise strict control over their behaviour。
Dog walk:
The dog fights and bites other dogs
On the night of 22 june, mr. Huang of sichuan kamong went to hongdong park to walk his dog. In the meantime, his dog beat up with a lady's dog, who bit out the dog's neck and bled and was immediately taken to a nearby pet clinic for treatment. “this fight was an accident.” mr. Wong said。
Mr. Wong released a video clip of the vomit
After a check-up at the clinic, the head of the centre pays the fee. Mr. Huang stated that he had determined, in consultation with the owner of the injured dog, that the medical expenses would be borne by mr. Huang and that they would not follow。
"i think it might be around $3,000, and the result is a list, $8,600, or $6,300." mr. Huang said that he had proposed a “concession point” to the court, claiming that “the discount was $6,300”. Mr. Huang still felt too expensive, but, in view of his own dog's fault, he could only pay $6,300 on the spot as compensation。
Seven days later, the dog finished his treatment and got out of the hospital。
Challenge:
Is there overmedicine? Reported to relevant departments
Red star journalists learned from mr. Wong's video and his story: the clinic was attended by an adult carcass dog whose neck position had been bitten with a few centimetres of wounds; according to a medical report, a total of 24 consultations were performed on tetanus, sterema, respiratory anaesthesia, dr photographs, reagent discs (whole biochemical), painkillers, blood needles, life rupee, etc., and a total of 7 days of treatment, at a total cost of $8,600, at a premium of $20360, at a real cost of $6,300。
The medical fee bill
Mr. Huang questioned, inter alia, “7 needles, 280” “7 needles, 210” “5 drs, 750” “24 comprehensive tests of reagent discs (full biochemistry)” and 650” “red covers of life, 40 and 45 ml, totalling 1800 dollars”。
In mr. Huang's view, the wounds to the dog were in the neck and did not result in any damage to the bronchial or artery, and the injuries were external, with an estimated cost of $12,000. According to mr. Huang, the decision to post the video on the internet was made after chatting with a number of friends at the end of july。
