What was the experience with the projector that was bought for over $200? Seeing this problem, i'm surprised at the 200-dollar projector? I didn't know there was, and there were cheaper ones. Such products may solve some and none of the problems, but it may be difficult to mention the use experience. How should ordinary people choose the projector, what specifications and what price would be appropriate? Let me just share my experience today and recommend a few really appropriate products。
Let's start with the hundreds or even $200 projectors on the internet. It is estimated that some of the young partners have already seen it on the news, and the results are so overwhelming that they don't know if there's any sign of fumi or something。
And that's one of the most typical problems of low-cost projectors: it's too bright. The projector's light bulb is the core component, while the light bulb is expensive and the light bulb is more expensive, so if it's cheap, the first sacrifice is the light。
There's one other thing about low-cost projectors, which is that it's bright enough, but the picture's terrible. Some of the images are an end-of-the-life picture, some of the actors in the play are all zombies, and others are completely pixels and lack details. This is usually due to the lack of power or small size of the dmd chip. There are, of course, a few fairy products that do not work with dmd chips and light bulbs, which are more likely to happen with cheap projectors。
I'm a projector user, and i use low-end projector. In my view, there are basic requirements if experience is to be guaranteed in the ordinary home environment. For example, the size of the dmd chip cannot be less than 0. 33 inches, so as to ensure at least 720 p resolution and some can reach 1080 p. The lightness of the light bulb has been the deep water area of the projector, not less than 1,500 liquids, according to ansi, and not less than 700 liquids, according to cvia, ensuring that the curtains are closed and visible。
The indicator parameter of the projector has always been a high “water” volume, especially with respect to the light of ansi, and even measurement standards and perceptions would be highly inconsistent. For example, i'm using a portable projector, which has disappeared in the industry. It points to an ansi brightness of 220 per cent, with 1,000 permutations at home, and a reverse failure. However, because of the liberalness of the ansi lumber test, more brands are more often true than not, especially for products with prohibitively low prices。
In the case of home-selection projectors, it would not be too cheap even if it were to achieve a marginal view. More often than not, even the support of the projector will be needed to be more effective, which is another cost. So it would be better if the individual recommended a budget of over $3,000. The value of the projector is that you can get a picture of 120 inches of television at 65 inches, and if the budget is too low, it's better to buy it honestly。
And then, with more peace, three projectors are recommended for the $3,000 budget, which may not be as cheap as some might think, but at least they won't step on the pit。
One, bet f3 air at $3499
When the bee f3 air is a single entry flag, the product uses 0. 47 " dmd chip, 1080 p physical resolution, 1250 cvia fluency, which, in simple conversion, is equivalent to 1800 ansi fluency, which is sufficient. The product is also equipped with automatic ladder correction, so it is easier to put it up and the system is able to automatically correct the image to the top. In addition, when the projection is preceded by an out-of-date person, the automatic screen prevents the light from looking at the person and is more friendly to families with children. The system is called bess, open without advertising. This price is really a replacement for television。
Two, nuts n1 air, 3099
Nut n1 air is also an entry-level product, 0. 23 " dmd, but also 1080p resolution, brighter than 700 cvia luminaries, about 1,300 ansi luminous, with a better effect by pulling curtains or turning lights off. This product specification is less expensive than donbe, but the necessary functionality is not diminished, such as the automatic calibration of the picture to the vertical level, and it also has an eye-proof design, which automatically reduces the brightness when someone dies before the projection. Also, in structural design, it carries its own shelf, officially known as the “mixed cloud table”, which makes it easier to set and can be very easy to project on the ceiling, and the product is still very selling。
Z8x, 3099
Apogee z8x uses 0. 33 inches of dmd to achieve 1080p resolution with a brightness equivalent to 820 via luminous, i. E. 1,500 ansi luminous, which is also useful at home. The product not only has an automatic ladder correction, but also corrects the side view, automatically aligns the projectile and has an automatic shield, which can be automatically scaled off when there are switches, plug-in panels, etc., and the system is not advertised. The greatest feature of the projector is that it optimizes the audio, and sometimes we watch the film in “hearing”, and the sound is often more important than the picture. It can be seen that the product has also been sold at $3099, but its specifications are better than those of the nuts, which are more human in their design。
In conclusion, basically, i think that a projector that is suitable for home use is in the range of $3,000, and it would be a bit more difficult if it was cheap, and $200 less likely. And they're all big bricks, and there's no super-thin or super-small product, because there's a certain conflict with the projector body, whether it's paint-seeking, resolution or brightness, at least a body that can keep the light bulb high and warm. On the basis of these techniques, even the choice of other projectors shows which products are suitable for their own use, and the three paragraphs here are only more typical。
