This year, sichuan kocaku was asked for voluntary admissions, the most striking of which was not a professional name, but rather a fee note from the admission schedule。
The subject group 110 of the chengdu institute of sciences, art education, with the title "teacher's education, 17,000, doesn't seem to be out of the question. The next one, the note is a cut-off, the innovation course, and $79,800 is required to pay for the training, and if the conditions are met, the candidates can continue their studies and apply for a post-advisory examination。
Even more interesting is the fact that, at first glance, the foreign language institute, a professional group of 105 english, and a tuition fee of 18,000, have appeared in the notes as a number of intellectual skills, with an additional premium of $21,800 per year, a total of $87,200 per year, four years and a year, and that many parents have a string in their hearts, which, in the first place, seems to be a volunteer, looks like a set, drags you in first, puts a fine item on the table。
The subtlest part of this is not whether the school is written or not, but whether you can read it at first glance. It's interesting to see that many candidates and parents, when they draw up their admission programmes, look at their professional names, then their tuition fees, and then go down。
In addition to the old problems, there is now an additional test of reality: “do you see the structure of the fee”, some of the professional names sound decent, teacher training, english, advanced education, directional training, a few words, and then the filter comes up, what's underneath the filter, parents have to pay, students have to study, schools have to write the rules clearly, and as for you to read them carefully, it depends on your patience。
In fact, these changes are not unusual, and the more detailed the admission plan is, the fact that education consumption is long gone beyond the word “school fees” - the costs of education, directional fees, laboratory classes, stacking up, like today's fees in many industries, showing you the main price, then making up for it slowly. The key is whether you can see that there is an adequate choice。
So the question is not “can't report”, but “do you know what you're buying before you read it” and there are internet users who look at it directly, school fees are like tickets, education fees are like hidden copies, when you get a letter of admission, when you see the school fees, the parents are probably silent, the students are afraid of going to college, and the result is a price statement。
The more bluntly stated that the more beautiful the admission plan is, the more you look at the notes, the less you look at the title, the less you listen to the publicity, the less you look at the cost, or the more you end up losing it, the less you sound, but it is true, after all, the higher examination is not a food purchase, the more you lose it once, the more you may want to spend four years or more, and no one wants to put their youth at the wrong cost。
It is not ironic that many families rush into a school, and it is probably not the admission points that really determine the pressure, but the additional fees, which are ostensibly professional advancements, that are actually testing the family budget, which is ostensibly a culture path, and actually the level of knowledge, which is the worst fear, not the price, but the fact that you think you already understand, but only the first half。
Of course, from a school perspective, they do not necessarily say they are “hidden”, after all the notes are written, the rules are in place and the process is there, but the problem is that the information is written, not as if the information was seen, the more the words were kept secret, the easier it was to be ignored, the more the position was put behind, the more it was to be jumped, which was repeated in many places, and over time, when the word “notes” was quickly re-reflected, and as soon as you saw it, it became clear that it was not simple。
To put it simply, it is more than just a general change in admission information. It is more like reminding everyone that today's high examination is voluntary, that it is long overdue, that it is not just a fraction, but also a reading, judgement, and sensitivity to the rules, that whoever sees the admission programme from the beginning, that one less pits and that one who stays in the “list by professional name” stage is more likely to be educated in reality。
Thus, when the acceptance notice was delivered, the real test was just beginning, and the child was thinking about the future, the parents were thinking about the general ledger, the school was writing about the rules, the market was about the cost, and it ended up in every family, it was an old saying that there was no cheapness in the world that was written in the title, and there was no real benefit that could be found without looking at the notes。
The most valuable of these years is probably not the “welcome test” sentence, but rather, would you like to look at the note before pressing the confirmation button, because many options are never lost in the score, but rather in the blink of the eye。
