That afternoon, i was wondering about the new calendar. Four industry websites, with 60 originals updated weekly, have two teams. The most comforting thing is not that you can't write, but that you know that some of the things that you write about can't be recorded, but still have to be consumed with hard skin in order to fill the goddamn "renewal frequency" target. It's like feeding an invisible black hole, and it doesn't ring. At the time, the admission rate was an encyclopedia, and more of the spirit was spent on how to make the article look like something, not what it really dealt with。
Then we tried a lot. Part-time writers are of poor quality and communication is more expensive than writing. A matrix of content and a dozen pieces of a central article, a “false original”, all look red. The work, the data curve in the back of the website, was very bumpy - it was upside down. The flow is like a dead water, and there are occasional visitors out, and the stay is unfortunately short. I began to wonder whether the so-called "king" of the king, which means "the loner of the king," was largely invisible。
Change is not sudden. It's about the toxic beginning of my understanding of the term "capacity." we're too concerned about “production”, making words, and forgetting “capable” — content of its own energy, it reaches users, is recognized by search engines and safeguards. An article with the words “capable” is worth 10 scrapes of keywords. The solution is good, but ideally, we have neither the means nor the means to inject this “energy” into every article. Until one time, in order to catch up to a hot spot, i was busy collecting material and trying to document it at a fast pace. One partner said you'd try a. I. S. E. O.'s assistant, and it's too late to get your mind straight. I was very submissive, and i thought that what ai wrote must be very mechanical. But it's urgent。
Practice has found that it helped me first, not by writing, but by finding and “whole”. It's like i'm going to write "the hard part of the old neighborhood with elevators," and i'm going to have to go through dozens of web pages and end up in it. It quickens me to sort out some of the central points of concern, as in the case of the low-level household compensation programme, the follow-up duty, the approval process, and some related long questions. This saves me a small amount of scavenging work. I began by adjusting the focus of my thinking from “how to finish” to “what to write to be searched and seen”. The tools are in this place, like a fast-responder, pulling me out of the information mud。
What really changed was the post-publication initiative. Retrieve the usual articles, and we're done with two more social media accounts and then pray. Then i used an anatomy module in the ai smart seo assistant, which, based on the content of the articles, recommended some connected, externally connected, old articles. I began to do this in a piecemeal way, using the new elements as a hub, to go to the old ones that were buried in the basement, but valuable. After about two months, i suddenly found that some of the old articles had never been recorded and had even begun with sporadic but continuing long tail flow. It's like the first time there's a weak echo。
I thought that the tool dealt with the question of “writing”, and later it was found to be of greater value to the question of “thinking” and “linking”. Instead, it forced me to focus on the search intentions, to think about the clues between the contents, instead of creating a document alone. The team spirit has also shifted from mechanical handling and rewriting to more advanced issues planning and post-disclosure link maintenance. Although the overall volume of articles does not appear to have increased explosively, the “mass” of each article seems to have improved。
Looking back now, the capacity bottlenecks may be a hypocritical proposition. In the sea of seo, more stones could be thrown, and if they were to be cast, they would not provoke the waves. It's not about how much you consume, it's about how much you consume, whether it's embedded in that big, search-and-demand network. The tool is not magic. It's just helping me find who's embedded. Sometimes i wonder if we're too committed to the original approach, and ignore the fact that the user is really looking for the “the answer”, which can be scattered over what we already have, just waiting for it to be reorganized and lighted. This road seems to have just seen a bit of disagreement。
