In response to the online controversy, there was a boom
This paper is based on the results of a search on the following microblogging topics:
On 26 may 2026, as a result of a hot search in response to a cyber controversy in the tweets, the subject of “uncomfortable” became the focus of the discussion, which triggered a boom in “uncomfortable literature”。
I. Basic background and origin of events
Yu zheng, a leading film writer and producer in the mainland, is represented by the jubilee strategy, " the heart of the palace " . On the afternoon of 26 may, he issued a long paper entitled “no matter how well he did, someone always picks a bone in an egg”, calling for attention to be drawn back to himself and for self-worth to be affirmed. The article was interpreted as a response to a recent online protest, and was quickly hot-searched by the media and netizens under the label #so uncomfortable #. Its core views include:
- self-reconciliation: emphasis on the rise and fall of life and refusal to punish oneself with the wrongs of others。
- focusing on the cause: by proposing that “yowl sand can't hide the light of pearls”, fans are encouraged to “work well and learn well”。
Netizen reactions and “uncomfortable literature”
The incident triggered a web-based jam, resulting in a “disturbing” phenomenon:
Circumspective imitation: netizens will be calling their speech "chicken and soup literature" and concocting their "saloon pearlism" with the contrast between fine self-censorship. As the account is ironic: “brother, your picture is so bad that pearl himself can't admit it”。
Interlocking reactions: the emergence of derivatives such as “end-of-cycle discomfort” “uncomfortable hit workers” reflects popular sentiment. Some netizens have questioned their “demonstrations” and argue that it seems paradoxical that the public opinion struggles all the time to talk about “self-focused” suddenly。
3. Linkage interpretation: it is assumed that the message was made for the white deer (who recently lost millions) or for wu choon (who did not film for two years) but did not respond explicitly。
Iii. Recent state and public image
Health management: at the beginning of 2026, after three months of physical fitness, 48 pounds of weight were reduced, with frequent periods of dratis, emphasizing that “body control is in control of life”。
Creative dynamics: in april, it was revealed that new scripts were being sharpened, stating that “subsidiary creation is the only solution” in the scenes of the industry; and that the new film, “kim illustrated”, had been promoted and had been approved as “a forced picture despite the actor's state”。
Controversy: their statements are often referred to as “paternity” or charades (as in the case of zhao ruth in 2025), but they are praised by their supporters as “daunting the truth”。
Iv. Historical grievances and industry implications
In march 2026, the actor ho ho spoke of the break-up of the decade, calling it a “lifetime regret” and retraced the break-up between the two because of the role selection and economic pressure of laughey river, which was labelled by his online friends as “aesthetics of dignity”。
The controversy over the works: the incident of the defeat in the copying case (us$ 5 million in 2015) continues to affect the reputation of some of the public opinion that it “disturbs the web”。
V. Representation of works and industry status
As a brand maker of the “pretty”, its work has led to discussions with conflicting narratives and women's images, such as the jubilee strategy, “the clouds of ink”. Despite continuing controversy, the industry has recognized its “market-friendly path” and has continued to explore new topics in recent years。
