Research previously published by mckinsey shows that a significant proportion of consumers in the north american market regret the purchase of electric cars。
In the north american market, more than 46 per cent of consumers want to switch fuel cars back to the next car because of the inconvenience of charging facilities and the high cost of electricity。
But this is only in the north american market, where, strictly speaking, the pace of electrodynamicization is completely different from that of the north american market。
One is that the penetration rate of electricized products in north america is around 10 per cent (data up to march 24), but domestic penetration has exceeded 45 per cent。
Another is that the domestic infrastructure is much richer than the north american market, and that the conditions for the replenishment of energy, whether for domestic charging stakes in fast charge or in small areas, are more convenient than the north american market。
Most critically, the price of electricity in the north american market has been converted into a dollar, a 100-km electricity-consuming 15-kwh tram, and the combined cost and fuel vehicle gap in the north american market has not been as large as expected, after all, the price of oil in the north american market is generally low。
If consumers in the north american market regret to buy electric cars because they are less economical than they thought they were, it is perfectly understandable。
While electric cars in the domestic market are more expensive and more accessible than overseas, there is still a large group of users who are regretting the selection of electric cars for reasons entirely different from those in the north american market。
Because prices are falling too fast, domestic consumers complain more about product inverts and price reductions too fast。
In the case of alpha s5, the new car, which was on the market in june, had a starting price of close to 170,000, and the current terminal price was less than 130,000, with a lower space of more than 20 per cent。
Unstable car pricing is extremely unsettling for users, and the use of a car is a mandatory option for most consumers at this time, but prices are too low for one day or another, and cars are one or even the only daily bulk of consumer goods that cannot be guaranteed price stability is very difficult for users。
At the same time, the technology of new energy vehicles has evolved in a quarterly manner, with energy density, renewal, battery packages, electric power, scientific sense, platform architecture, intelligent driving aids, etc。
Looking at the market environment in 2023 by mid-2024, a large proportion of the new energy vehicles sold last year are lagging behind。
We interviewed no less than 20 motorbike consumers, of whom more than 12 regretted choosing electric cars, but of course the reason why electric cars were chosen was not because they were less expensive than fuel cars, but because they were too fast to cut prices, and they were too fast to buy them, which they could not understand。
In front of the fuel truck, the advantage of the tram is clear。
For example, low-cost, fast-paced and quiet, while most urban charging facilities are a reason for them to be happy, the problem is equally obvious, the hand is of no value, and in a year's time technology lags behind。
If you buy it, you lose it. If you don't buy it, you lose it。
The current market for passenger cars is in a clear state of disarray, and in order to seize the market share of fuel vehicles in a short period of time, it must be cheaper and more technologically advanced in order to capture sales from the traditional fuel vehicle market。
At present, fuel-car companies are constantly lowering prices in order to preserve their traditional shares, such as the landing price of 1. 2t, which has already reached 80,000. The advantages of the value of the market are clear, and a firewall has been built in larger markets, with branding, product power, technology and cognitive advantages, to block the development of new energy sources。
The fast-evolving nature of the trams and the fast-paced nature of the prices are also forced, but the trams do have better day-to-day performance at the day-to-day level。
Current prices cannot be guaranteed, and technology is fast, a corollary to evolution and optimization。
