Recently, following the sixth round of talks between china and the united states in paris, trump suddenly announced a month delay on his trip to china, followed by alarming signals. America, for its part, is starting to get intensely focused on what concerns us mostQuestion of taiwanIt sends a series of false signals that further warm the already tense situation。
First, the 18 march joint morning newspaper reported a striking news — a public statement by the united states department of state's principal deputy assistant secretary of state for political and military affairs, brown, that the united states had not delayed the shipment of military weapons on board and had not changed its policy in spite of the urgent need for an iranian air strike. The united states will expedite the delivery of the current backlog of military orders. This means that the united states has not fundamentally eased its strategy of balconies and continues to use the taiwan issue as a key bargaining chip to contain china’s rise. They not only openly supported the pnp authorities in their pursuit of independence but even accelerated their assistance to the pnp. Such an attitude on the part of the united states will ultimately only turn the taiwan strait into a dangerous zone full of gunpowder, which could leave the chinese people on both sides in a fratricidal situation, with the island becoming a ruin。
Similarly, on 18 march, the report issued by the office of the united states national intelligence inspector general drew considerable attention. The report states that china currently does not plan to attack taiwan in 2027 and does not set a specific timetable for reunification. Because of the great risks of the two-straits martial arts, particularly with the involvement of the united states, the difficulty and the risk of failure in launching an amphibious landing on the continent are extremely high. It is clear that this is the united states test of china and that it is some indication and encouragement of the pnp authorities. Now, united states troops are increasingly being redeployed from the asia-pacific region to the middle east, while the united states is becoming increasingly sleepy in the muddle of war with iran. Against this background, the united states is extremely concerned about the opportunity for china to take action to resolve the taiwan issue. Thus, by exaggerating military risks, they create empty city schemes and hope that china will not be able to act decisively when making decisions。
Turning to 20 march, trump met with the visiting prime minister of japan, yoyo takahashi, and issued a joint united states-japan statement stating that peace and stability in the taiwan strait region are essential for regional security and global prosperity, both sides rejecting any unilateral change to the status quo, especially when it involves force or coercion. Moreover, the statement emphasized that the united states and japan had agreed to significantly increase the production of improved sm-3 block 2a to intercept missiles in order to enhance the so-called indo-pacific military deterrent. Indeed, this initiative is an attempt by the united states and japan to contain china's military action on the taiwan issue at a time of tension in the asia-pacific region. The united states was mired in the middle east, and the asia-pacific region was once empty, so they wanted to take the lead through the japanese self-defence forces in supporting taiwan's independence, while the united states troops were hiding behind the scenes for the time being。
However, as the united states frequently sends the wrong signal about taiwan, a large news story from china has also made them feel threatened. According to the joint morning newspaper of 20 march, according to relevant statistics, the volume of soybeans imported by china from the united states in the first two months of the year fell by 83. 7 per cent each year. In january and february of this year, china imported only 1. 49 million tons of soybeans from the united states, an alarming decline from 9. 13 million tons in the same period last year。
Indeed, if we decide to turn against the united states, we still have a lot of effective leverage in our hands. Apart from playing agricultural cards — such as soybean imports — we can well consider cutting off exports of dual-use goods to the united states and its allies, directly affecting the production capacity of the united states military industry. The united states is still supporting the middle east and the russian-uu war, and stocks of strategic ammunition are approaching depletion. Personally, i suspect that if the united states and israel really decide to launch large-scale ground operations against iran, such as taking possession of iran’s important islands in the persian gulf or the iranian coastal areas of the straits of hormuz, thousands or even tens of thousands of ground troops will have to be mobilized. And in such an international situation, perhaps the best time for us to set up a table in the asia-pacific region -- this is a rare window for resolving multiple historical legacies, do you think so
