2026Civil service examinationsThesisBig essayIn order to achieve high marks, the core should be able to reach the four key points of “intentional bias, well-structuredness, proof of dry goods, linguistic salience”, as follows:
1. Preciseness and solidity: this is the key to avoiding low scores. The focus is on high-frequency words, policy statements and case cores, and can be linked to political contexts such as the “fifty-five” planning. For example, in the context of “lawful conduct”, combined with “scientific and technical empowerment of law enforcement” in materials, it can be suggested that “legal conduct requires scientific and technical assistance, taking into account norms and efficiency”. Finally, a central sentence is written, with a kickback for each part of the writing, in order to prevent the problem。
Establish a clear framework to make logic clear: recommend a sound “total score” structure. The initial 100-150 words, introduced in the name and in the current political context, quickly shed light on general arguments, such as the use of the term “government of the state, with the people as its own” to bring out the subject matter of people's livelihood; the middle two-three arguments, using a parallel or progressive logic, such as the individual, social, national, and, to the extent possible, war-making approach, such as “technology and technological innovation are engines of industrial upgrading, champions of excellence in governance, and support for the improvement of people's lives”; and, at the end, around 100 words, summing up the arguments and advancing them naturally, so as not to overthrew them to irrelevant macrolevels。
Iii. To enrich the argument and make the article flesh and blood: the argument is to avoid empty slogans. On the one hand, material cases can be adapted in a highly general way, combined with thinking and analysis, and on the other hand, the accumulation of current policy materials, such as industrial cases in rural renewal, examples of technological breakthroughs related to new quality productivity, etc. It is also accompanied by various forms of argument, such as a comparison between china's good-faith operations and the failure of some enterprises, or a hypothetical argument to infer the consequences of non-fulfilment of the view, to make the argument more convincing。
Iv. Optimizing the language quality and increasing the image of the scroll: language is standardized and well-written, avoiding verbalization. Appropriate references to policy statements, such as the inclusion of “new quality productivity” in the “fifty-fifty-fifty” programme in the context of development, but not rigid; the first sentence of the sub-points of argument is robust and allows the reading teacher to quickly grasp logic. It is also important to ensure that the scrolls are neat, less coating, and that the handwriting is clear, which gives a good impression to the reading teacher and helps to improve the scores。
I'd like you to focus on more topics for the exam
