The law daily, the press, the king's family leung, the trainee, the hutt flag
Since its establishment, the court of intellectual property of guiyang city, guizhou, has been actively exploring the issue of judicial protection of intellectual property rights in the digital economy, and has been working hard to do so。
Optimizing the rule of law environment in the digital economy
The study launched 18 priority initiatives for the development of the digital economy of services, which focused on strengthening the legal protection of data rights and personal information, promoting the development of the digital industry in accordance with the law, helping to improve the digital governance system and accelerating the development of new qualitative productivity. Since its establishment in july 2024, the tribunal has upheld the equal protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the right holders concerned, protected innovations in innovative ways, promoted the legal consideration of 513 cases involving disputes over ownership of computer software, violations and related technical contracts by city-wide courts and concluded with a sum of $103 million; dealt with 808 cases involving copyright and the promotion of the supply of high-quality digital cultural products; strengthened the protection of commercial secrets in the digital economy, dealt with conflicts of rights such as trademarks, symbols and domain names, and dealt with 371 cases; dealt with 37 cases involving unfair competition in accordance with the law; maintained an open and competitive digital market environment; and punished criminal offences in the digital economy by law, and 35 cases involving offences involving cyber games, electronic books, registered trademarks and the use of the internet to commit intellectual property offences such as violations of copyright, the sale of counterfeit registered trademarks and so forth. At the same time, the establishment of the “people's court for the great data section” in the new district of guiang has been promoted to enable the new district to develop with high quality。
Continuous development of synergistic protection patterns
In cooperation with the provincial intellectual property authority, a judicial protection base for data intellectual property has been set up to strengthen the judicial protection of data intellectual property. In the case of a data company v. A network company concerning a contract for the development of computer software, it was established that an enterprise had a risk-preventive and safety-protection obligation to gather, gather, contact, hold personal information or public data that affected public safety in the context of its involvement in computer-based construction, and that the case had led to a judicial decision to safeguard data security. At the same time, it has furthered the five mechanisms established with market regulators for regular communication, multi-faceted resolution, transfer of clues, mutual enjoyment and legal awareness, and has deepened its links with the centre for the protection of intellectual property of the city of guiyang. In the case of a criminal offence involving the sale of fraudulently registered trademarks, after a criminal judgement has been handed down, the enterprises concerned are placed on the list of serious breach of trust by the market supervisory authorities, with a view to achieving coordinated protection. Actively act as a working point such as the south ming court's “major data intellectual property judicial protection contact point”, creating a directory of large data enterprises, bringing 65 large data enterprises over the size of the register, as a front-end solution to intellectual property conflicts in the digital economy。
Improving intellectual property justice mechanisms
Strengthening research on critical areas, core technologies, emerging industries, cases of judicial protection of intellectual property rights, major dilemmas and cutting-edge issues, and promoting improved rules of judicial protection of intellectual property rights in the digital economy. (c) furthering the “triple justice” reform of civil, administrative and criminal trials to ensure consistency in their outcome. Strengthening digital empowerment and furthering the reform of the single filing of full-process online cases and electronic files, building on the development of digital courts to optimize trials, fast-tracking and fast-tracking models, in an effort to reduce the resolution cycle. The multidisciplinary technical fact-finding mechanism for the participation of technical advisers, technical experts and professional people's jurors in the proceedings, based on the system of technical investigators, has been continuously developed. Eighty-nine technical investigators and technical advisory experts have been publicly selected to enhance the neutrality, objectivity and scientific nature of the factual findings concerning the new state of digital technology and to enhance the credibility of the judiciary. Optimizing the layout of the jurisdiction of intellectual property cases in city-wide courts, increasing, as appropriate, some of the main urban courts as grass-roots people's courts with jurisdiction in intellectual property civil and administrative cases, responding positively to the growing demand for judicial protection of intellectual property rights by market subjects, continuously upgrading the quality of the services of litigation in intellectual property disputes, providing high-quality and efficient judicial protection of intellectual property rights, and providing strong judicial services and guarantees for the display of the new style of guizhou in china's modernization process。
