According to information received on 9 february, china today has indicated that the recall of the car for the installation of metal linings was not a “fix” for cost-saving purposes and that the installation of metal linings did not violate the relevant regulations。
The above-mentioned information was published via twitter after a media conference between china and a public. The general public also indicated that the coating of the back bridge arm with a “fishtail” was a normal phenomenon, left behind by the production process, with no impact on the strength of the components or on the effects of corrosion resistance。
It is understood that last year's fast-paced “break-the-axis” plunged the public into a crisis of confidence. On 2 february this year, the public sent a recall letter to the owner of the vehicle, adding metal linings to the vehicle in danger in order to prevent a break-off。
According to the public, metal linings are a global solution for mass cars. It is made of the same steel as a coupling post-suspension and provides “double insurance” to the owner: the first is to maintain the stability and control of vehicle movements following the break-up of the arm and the second is to provide an alert to the owner of the vehicle to the nearest dealer。
At today's launch, the general public insisted on a consistent caliber on the old question of “why does the fasting break the axis”, stating that the 61 cases of break-axis received as of 9 february “were all the axes caused by a violent impact”
It was also reported in the chinese merchant newspaper that the price of the fast-paced used car fell in a straight line as a result of the “break-off axle door”, and mr. Wang said that he wanted to sell the car, that it was worth more than 13,000 kilometres and offered less than 30,000 miles, but that several buyers, after hearing it was a fast-moving car, said that they were too bold to drive。
