When it comes to words, many think of zhu yuanjin。
There are numerous stories of his killing for “word taboos” such as the “conformity” of professor lin won-lang, zhejiang province, who wrote in the "seniority of the constitution", and the “symphony of the “thust”. In the département de l'enseignement, u. K. Was taught to read the "sun of horatio" and "do" and "tholebet" and to cut it off. The changzhou capital learned to teach chiang town to “be wise and wise” and “born” and “monks” to be cut off。
Moreover, after two years of ordering the removal of monkoku from the temple position, and twenty-seven years of hongwu, zhu yuanzhi ordered the deletion of monkoh, a total of 85 chapters of the book, which were considered absurd, were deleted, representing one third of the book. Even though zhu won-chun is so “sensitive”, he is no better than qing dynasty. It is true that the qing dynasty is a modern generation that flourishes in this prison, even to the point of “scattering the wind”。
In order to better consolidate their position, the rulers have become inexorably in control of public opinion. It can even be said that sometimes it is “aggressive”. It was all a paper medium, so monitoring of words was one of the main tasks of the court. It can be said that during the 300 years of the qing dynasty, there was a fear that one word would be put to life。
In particular, there are three periods: kang hee, kan rong, and zheng xuan. According to statistics, the number of “manufactured” penitentiaries during the year was 140. He has been in power for 60 years, 3 years, and 63 years. That is to say, on average, two to three cases per year for him. In fact, these figures alone are good, but the trauma inflicted by words on the human population and society as a whole is beyond repair for a long time。
Next, let's talk about some of the grievances。
I. Sun ga-chul's fake script
The client was scared to death. Sun jia-chul spoke out loudly and dared to make some dissent in the court. As a result, they have been used in their name to spread the mistakes of the democratic people's republic of korea since its inception. After that, the emperor investigated that it had been forged, but the client was terrified and died in the third year. Actually, the emperor didn't blame him。
As can be seen, this fear is more deadly than the knife。
It was said that it was a expression of social dissatisfaction with the court, except that it was in the name of a minister. In that case, the parties should not be so shocked, since the dispute between the officials of mandarin and the qing dynasty never stopped. Is he not a “victim” of political struggle? In a way that is consistent with its normal style of humanity, it can be struck by the prevailing circumstances, and there is no real motive。
Thus, it is certain that during its 15 years in power, kanlong has made “word prison” a “devil” in which the people of mandarin are afraid。
Ii. The huchong algae "the griming poetry"
The case was the result of a genuine party dispute. Hu chong algae are the principals of the ortaire, and the officials hate the gang. So, it became necessary, and his poem got hold of the emperor. “a clean heart”, a “clean mind” is a “word”, and the emperor is very angry when he is born。
Why put the word “slurp” before the word “clean”
In february, the case was closed in march of the same year, not only for the ethnic group, but also for the teachers. In this regard, the author would like to know what kind of interpretation would it be if the word “silent” were after “cleaning up”
This happened in 20 years, when power began to be “prior”。
Wang zinhui's "longdu" case
In fact, wang zin chou himself is responsible for this case. A good day, but instead of using the emperor as an example, it's a good thing. At the time, he had written the words “in every instance”, citing the names of confucius, kang-hee and kanlong, who had intended to teach people how to do so in order to avoid taboos and who had thought that he had committed “crimes against the heavens”。
But how can he give the best example? The emperor himself must be asked. There are comments from later generations, which are typical of authoritarianism. In fact, the ancient discourses are in the hearts of the people. Later, he realized, too, that it was only too late for the emperor to allow the minister to “wrong” and that taboos were sometimes more intolerable than doing wrong。
Now that the emperor has so much regard for the words, there is no shortage of words to be used by a “meaning person”。
He was denounced by his enemies for his poems. I have been buried for 15 years and have been decapitated. He was also accused by his enemies of two words of "the way is the way is the way is the way is the way is the place is the place is the place is the place is the place is the place is the place to die."。
Poetry can cause trouble, and a commentary can't escape it。
By writing “the same day”, cheng was considered by the emperor to be “the present time” and decided. Wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei, wei wei wei wei wei wei wei wei we secretary, who, who, however, the old man, better understood, saw the reference to the “five-hu, zengdi” as an implication and sentenced him to death。
In addition, there are numerous cases。
The zhuo dynasty case, the day of the world case and the longer age case have all been the result of a tragic crime. Even if it were true, the emperor considered it “silent and illegal and truly a people”。
In the twenty-first year of jiangsu's disaster, jusgae failed to act, so he put together a book called "strangling the hour" and called them greedy. Perhaps the emperor thought so: "scolding my officials means scolding me, and the word "cut" solves the problem。
The traditional academic community considers this to be an extreme means of maintaining domination by the class. In fact, the deeper reason is that they are not confident of themselves. So, if you say anything, you can provoke that sensitive nerve。
At first, it might be possible to find “traces” and then it was really its own “assumption”。
However, this phenomenon is rare when it comes to the constitutional dynasty, which is also ruled by a foreign race, and it is assumed that this “indifferentness” can be achieved only if there is a genuine disregard for a culture in the bones。
References:
I'll be back in a minute
