In mid-january, during a question-and-answer session at the first interim shareholders' meeting in 2019, dong myung-ju said, “don't ever talk to me about ox. It's worse than beautiful. Now ox digs in me every day, even workers, even my men go to him and change their names. It's in my mood, steals our technology, and fakes.”
After two years of litigation, gwig, despite winning the patent action, reported to ox。
On 10 june, gwig had published a report on official microblogging, stating that some of the type air-conditioning products produced by ox were significantly different from their promotional and nominal energy efficiency. In its submission, gwits stated that the real name had been reported to the general directorate of state markets oversight for the production and sale of substandard air conditioners by oks air conditioning co. Ltd。
A few hours later, the auxiliary air conditioner issued a statement on the so-called whistle-blower letter of the auxiliary air conditioner in official weibo, alleging that gwig had reported false reports。
Gwig subsequently published in its official microblog eight inspection reports issued by sichuan province electronics supervisory inspection, stating, “as a matter of fact, we are prepared to have sufficient evidence available to the regulatory authorities and, as appropriate, to the community”. And ox's official microblog shows that zheng jinjiang, chairman of the ox group, said he would welcome oversight and work together to create a reputation for the quality of the nation's brand。
This is not the first time that gwig has reported to other businesses. Prior to this, gwig and dong myung joo themselves had fought with their opponents in the areas of air conditioning and new energy sources。
Gwig and u. S. "touching": from reporting a one-night electric fraud to a suspected violation of fang hongbo's sip
The same air-conditioning giant, as well as the guangdong enterprise, gwik and u. S., are “challenges” who, in addition to fierce competition in the market, have engaged in a full range of other battles. It includes both “prescriptive actions” such as patent litigation, as well as reporting to the relevant state authorities, and public retorts, among other things, of interest to public opinion。
The most recent report occurred in february this year. On 16 january, dong myung ju announced at the shareholders ' meeting that gwig had earned $26 billion after tax in 2018. This failure to disclose significant information in advance led to a deep letter of concern from mr. Guekli and to a warning letter from the guangdong censorship board。
On 11 february, dong myung joo, the new gryung monopoly, liu xiaowei, reported on weibo that hongbo, the director of the united states board of directors, had also disclosed his company's performance to the media in advance, but that the guangdong department of forensics did not send a warning letter to him, which constituted selective enforcement. A week later, the institute and the guangdong department of forensics carried out the same measures against united states groups and fan hongbo。
Earlier, dong myung-ju had repeatedly criticized the “one-night electricity” ad for “fake”. According to incomplete statistics by ninjing newspaper journalists, at least in 2016, 2017 and 2019, tung myung-ju has shelled advertising in public。
In january 2016, gryngjin chen reported on twitter that the air conditioning project, which received the 2014 national prize for scientific and technological progress, was suspected of forgery. On behalf of the company, gwig also filed a complaint with the national incentive office。
Two days after chen weibo reported, a u. S. Air conditioner engineer, li bao, reported that guly's award-winning project was faked in 2011. Subsequently, the prosecution of the whistle-blowers was announced separately by gwig and the united states. On 8 march of that year, gwits publicly accused the united states of false propaganda, abuse and theft of commercial secrets。
And the chairman of the american group publicly called glig the “innumerable `painting'” at the shanghai marketing conference the next day, saying, “we can't help but report it and fight back, and we made a statement. We will not speak until we have had to.”
Tung myung-ju's relationship with wei's silver warehouse is “break-up”: reporting refers directly to individuals
In addition to the struggles between guly and the united states, dong myung-ju himself fought with people in the area of new energy vehicles. There have also been reports and prosecutions between the two shareholders, minju, who actually control the capital, and mr. Wei's banker, who effectively controls the silver long investment holdings group, which is a major shareholder。
Dong myung-ju purchased the new energy source at a full cost of $13 billion in 2016, but the acquisition was rejected by small shareholders in gwig electric. Subsequently, tung myeong joo and others co-financed about $3 billion in shares. Since then, dong myung-ju has been replenished and has become the second largest shareholder in the new energy source of silver。
Dong myung-ju had a “honeymoon season” with the silverhound group controlman wei, but at the end of 2017 the news was mixed. At the beginning of 2018, when mr. Wei, who had previously served as chairman of the silver light energy board, resigned, the conflict between dong and wei began to become public。
On 13 november 2018, the new silver energy source, which was already under the control of dong myung joo, was sent a message via the twitter public number, stating that the former chairman of the board, wei gykura, and former chairman of the board, sun guohua, were suspected of usurping the company's assets by unlawful means, and that the company had filed a complaint with the courts and reported to the public security authorities。
However, wei's warehouse also offered to sue dong myung ju. On 14 november, a document on the internet, entitled " letter to all shareholders of silver light energy limited " , with the official seal of the silver long group, stated that “the individual shareholders and the actual control of the company, ming joo, used the company to cause distress to large shareholders for their own personal gain, was vicious and used in bad ways”. It was also indicated that the group would report to the authorities the fact that she was suspected of having committed an offence。
If both sides are correct, the struggle between dong myung-ju and wei's silver silo around new energy sources will also take place in court。
Gwig and ox had a lot of problems: they had been poached, they had been charged with patent infringement for $40 million
This time, gwig reported sales of substandard air conditioners by ox, not the first time that gwig and ox had had an affair。
According to the chinese network of judicatures, on 17 july 2018, the supreme law issued a second-instance civil award in the case of the violation of the practical new patent rights by ningboox air conditioning co. Ltd. And chu hagrid electric co. Ltd。
The above decision shows that the appeal was dismissed and the original decision upheld in accordance with article 170, paragraph 1 (a), and article 171 of the code of civil procedure of the people's republic of china. The decision is final。
Three months earlier, on 24 april 2018, the guangzhou court of intellectual property handed down its first judgement in the case. The court held that the products complained of fell within the protection of the plaintiff's patent, and that the technical defence raised by ox inc. Was not valid, and ordered ox to destroy immediately the stocks of tort products and the specially designed moulds for the manufacture of tort products, as well as compensation for the economic losses and reasonable costs of defending rights totalling $40 million。
This action originated in 2017. According to the guangzhou intellectual property court network, in november of that year, the guangzhou court of intellectual property held a hearing in the case of a dispute brought by chu haegli electric co. Ltd. Against ningboox air conditioning co. Ltd. For violation of the practical new patent rights。
Guly sued it as a patentee for a practical new patent entitled “an indoor machine for an air conditioner”. The eight types of air-conditioning products produced, sold and promised to be sold by ox and the guangzhou kindong trading company ltd. (hereinafter referred to as crystal) are suspected of using the above-mentioned technologies and falling within the scope of the patent claims in question, and constitute patent infringement. The court was requested to order the two defendants to cease the violation immediately and ox inc. To compensate for the economic loss and reasonable expenses totalling $40 million。
Gly also states that in the past, various parts or components of air conditioners, such as front- and back-of-pipe tanks, drain tanks and drains, were designed separately, requiring separate multi-formulations, resulting in increased production costs and inefficient production. Also, because of the large equipment process and the complexity of the assembly relationship, it is prone to leaking, leaking and condensing problems caused by inadequate assembly, and air conditioners can operate with a different degree of heat and cooling of parts。
Gravity patented air conditioners, shell and back and back-link tanks are all integrated and can reduce the number of spare parts, reduce assembly processes and increase production efficiency. The leakage of air conditioners, leaks of wind condensation and acoustic problems have also been significantly reduced, thus gaining market preference。
The defendant ox inc. Argued that the patent rights in question had been partially invalidated by the patent review board of the state intellectual property office, and that because the patent rights were in a precarious state, the court should have dismissed the plaintiff's action or suspended the case; and that the technology used in the sued product produced by ox inc. Did not fall within the scope of the plaintiff's patent claims and did not constitute a violation. The defendant, jingdong, argued that, as a seller, it did not know and had no reasonable reason to know whether the product complained of constituted a patent infringement and that the product complained of had a legal origin。
According to the guangzhou daily, the case was heard in two public sittings at the guangzhou court of intellectual property on 10 october and 16 november 2017, and the air conditioners involved were removed from the premises in court in order to compare technical details between the judge and the technical investigator。
On 24 april 2018, the guangzhou court of intellectual property handed down a first instance judgement in the case. The court held that the products complained of fell within the protection of the plaintiff's patent, and that the technical defence raised by ox inc. Was not valid, and ordered ox to destroy immediately the stocks of tort products and the specially designed moulds for the manufacture of tort products, as well as compensation for the economic losses and reasonable costs of defending rights totalling $40 million。
According to guangzhou daily, on the same day, the guangzhou court of intellectual property also pronounced five other patent violations by gwig v. Ox. In three of these cases, because gwig could not prove that the act of creating the defendant tort air conditioner continued after the patent notice in question, the act of creating the defendant tort air conditioner before the patent notice in question and the sale of the said air conditioner after the licence announcement did not constitute a violation and the entire claim was rejected by the court。
In the remaining two cases, ox's production of air conditioners was found to constitute a violation and ox's burden of proof was impaired, and ox was sentenced to compensation for the full sum of $6 million claimed by gwig。
In fact, behind gwig's prosecution of the violation of air conditioning patents sold by ox was the frequent poaching by ox of gwig's backbone technicians。
It has been publicly reported that since 2010, ox has, by various means, removed more than 300 core personnel from the gwigs, research and development, quality control, etc., in an effort to build up their scientific workforce. Subsequently, gwig had been able to sue ox for multitype air conditioners。
As early as june 1, 2015, at the gwig shareholders ' conference, the re-elected chairman of the gwig electric board, dong myung ju, revealed: to date, gwig has been poached by rivals for over 600 people, exceeding the pace of human development, and has seriously undermined his innovative motivation, and he hopes that the government will take such events into account and that a system such as this will be regulated as soon as possible。
In mid-january this year, during a question-and-answer session at the first interim shareholders' meeting in 2019, the president and president of gwire electric dong myung joo said: “don't tell me about ox. Our sales, installed every day, are in excess of 780,000, and from the number of installed, we believe that gly is operating with great optimism. Second, why not let tiox, it's worse than beauty. 'cause i'm the one who digs, and i don't dig anymore. Now ox digs in me every day, even workers, even my men go to him and change their names. It's in my mood, steals our technology, and fakes.”
