In a video message about the marx capitalist book from the station, there was a young fellow who asked me about my comments and wanted to learn about mr. Thomas penn, so i thought that a few years ago i had a memoir of an article that he wrote with feelings, and now i'm going to take it out to show more people about this american ruther
It will be recalled that i met thomas pane in the introduction to the geometry book of shaanxi teacher university press. And the recommended book is called common sense... And it's the common sense that makes me wonder about his sharp writing, his rational analysis, his perceptive insight, his irritation. It is a pamphlet of less than a few thousand words, almost one in american hands during the american war of independence, that provides a solid ideological foundation for the victory of the war of independence. It is he who engraved the idea of "all human beings are born equal" in america and in the world and in my heart。
Common sense
Born in england, the man who later entered the united states and joined the wave of resistance to british rule in pursuit of american independence. He's got a common sense, a sharp vision, an incisive, sophisticated, and convincing. Common sense uses rhetoric and in-depth discussions, religious leadership, and generous incitement to infuse the mood, to impress the reader. No, to express the voice of the american people — to emerge from british rule and to seek an independent democratic state. It foresees the future, judges good and evil, guides the tide; democracy comes from the hearts of men. What kind of skill is it, what kind of a spirit, or what kind of magic it is? The thousands of words in this region not only analyse the situation, inspire morale, preserve hope, but above all write history. Pan sees the british knot, sees the moment of victory, relies on the bible's “revelation” and gives the american people a strong armed body. With confidence, conviction and trust, the united states will be independent. And pan's commons is the lighthouse on the long road of history。
People of the central african republic
The role of “common sense” is not easy, and some of the americans and the united kingdom want to remain dependent, the master and not the warring factions. And among them, the famous director of philly theology, william smith, the anti-war faction of the cato, used pseudonyms against pan and his commons. That had to be done by pan, for america, for democracy, for faith. Pan, in the name of “the inhabitants of the forest”, “the eyes for the eyes and the teeth for the teeth”. Four pieces of rags from forest dwellers. It has completely broken the kotuls’ dream of peace, stabilized the vagabonds, and inspired the people on the path to democracy in the united states. The inhabitants of the forest, in response to keto's bowing knees and false pretences, responded with a sharp “criticism”. This “popular” is so sophisticated, serious and passionate that suddenly — because a humorous phrase will make you laugh like a grumpy old professor who suddenly makes funny faces. One heart-smuggling, several self-smuggling ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! It is more powerful and more capable of conquering the hearts of men than the wisdom of the swift response and, in my own view, pan's writing. And, of course, they can't laugh, they can't hide, they can't fight back, they can't. When the ketus compared the relationship between britain and the united states to lovers' quarrels, the inhabitants of the forest misled pan's mistakes by telling the truth, and common sense — the author's own writings, of course, are made out of his chest and his chest, refuting and repulsing each other – imagine that if the reader read the word “single” in his hand, he would “sympathize” with “kutus, because the power of the text is enough to show the ketus to god.” the victory has been felt for a few rounds, and the ferocious “inhabitants of the forest” have shut the mouth of those who oppose the peace of the sunless empire. This brings to mind the scene of kong ming's going to the east wu tequila, and let me take a pannian sense of humor and ask myself: do you know if pan has read "the three nations" before he wrote commons in the eighteenth century。
Human rights
Finally, the political outlines of pan’s orthodoxy were read, the original text refuting “edmond burke’s attack on the french revolution and his insults, which is relatively serious and boring, but the occasional “pan-sweet” always makes it clear that he is the author of pan. And this unfortunate mr. Burke became the second "ktu" to be defeated by this talented forester. In the doctrine of human rights, the argument that all human beings are born equal has reached a new level here as a symbol of the world's democratic trend. In the human rights discourse, he focused on the idea that human rights were born into the universal declaration of human rights: equality of all human beings, equality of rights between generations, freedom as an inalienable right, etc. Proceeding from these principles, pan strongly condemned the feudal dictatorship of hierarchy and its monarchy and praised the republican system of government and representation. Supported the french revolution, while condemning the british parliament of nobility. This makes pan to be seen by the british system's defenders as “a nail in the eye, a prick in the flesh”. Human rights theory has also become prohibited in the uk. And pan was tried by english courts in his absence. This suggests that the doctrine of human rights for the feudal dynasty is a “storm storm”, a “blowing storm” that has planted “human rights” in the hearts of authoritarian kings, and has left them in a state of fear. It is an incisive book on democratic rights, a way forward on the right to freedom, a law to punish evil and to call for justice. The doctrine of human rights deals with human rights, freedom and equality, and fair justice. Let's see how pan explores patriotism's hoax; the national emotion trick. The promotion of a clear understanding of the meaning of freedom, the power of rights, gives people a more selective approach to peace, to society, to rule in a more standard and rigorous manner, with simple and insightful language, such as simple non-defeating relationships. It is natural to understand the most solemn issues at the same time, as if everything were doomed. His human rights doctrine was the most impressive chapter of the french revolution, the first half of which was macro-explanatory, while the second half went deep into the social dimension, providing a fine analysis and suggesting a path to reform in the united kingdom. As can be seen, pan’s story is so fine and nuanced that he does not leave any detail behind, and does not intend to give up any opportunity to advance the democratic process in europe. It is true that pan is pragmatic, but it still gives him the principle of giving way to his place
Economic and social council
If you read commons and are familiar with human rights theory, you will not be impressed by the original thinker's writing, and you will not disagree with the merits of this democracy fighter. The people of the united states, and even washington himself, admired him for his preference for a seat in the political status of both the united states and france, which he would have enjoyed the comfort of his achievements, his good career, his salary, his admiration and his praise. From the point of view of the world today, it can be said that he has achieved everything. It's time to settle down. But this stupid pan, this stupid pan, this stubborn pan, is committed to the enlightenment of society, as if it were his home, his wealth, his everything. And his choice of rival is precisely what has been admired, with the population reading more than the world's second-ranked book, geometry, with the first authority on the ground - the bible. It is true that pan believes in the good of humanity and promotes it. He tried to do it, but he also wanted to give others the power to do it. In the age of reason, he had called for it more than once. And this thomas pann, the pet of this age, has inspired the idea of religion, which is the root of american religion, and pan, who was their friend, has now come to root, so, thomas pan, your tragedy is doomed..
Thomas pann, remember your words in common sense to guide the bible to the religious bond of the american people to break with the sunless empire. And if it were a practical means for you, it would not be a noble thing, but it would not be a disgrace, for it is for a just cause. And now you see the big picture, you're in the middle of it, you're in the middle of it, you're in the middle of it, you're in the middle of it. You have a political vision, so you predict that a lot of it will happen, and you have the skills, so you're doing it pragmatically. And now, for similar purposes, you have abandoned the means and caution that you should have, and what you want to protect and what you want to hit is the same kind of person. Do you realize you're alive? Why expose the bible's contradictions and stab this beehive? Why do you have to say that reason is not superstitious authority? And why do you think natural theology is the only and best way out? You're suggesting that science is the only theologian whose vision is more than the number of civilians and the number of believers in that era. You're suggesting that god is the only one, but that it exists in nature, and it's like the scene of the second galileo and the dark era of europe as a whole. And you know how the longer a man's limits remain, the harder it is to change, and how stubborn ignorance and low self-esteem concealing themselves from flight intersect with his life. There are a few people in the world who have the courage to admit their mistakes, especially when the wrong time is almost a lifetime... And you're doomed, no, you're doomed. For your principles, you gave up your pragmatism. For this age of reason, for this age of science, look at what happens to you -- if you're alive, i'd really like to ask you in person what you were thinking. It's an idea that in my age's rational thinking...
Thomas pann
After all, you can't live three hundred years, and i don't have a time shuttle, but the pann selected in a bookshop has given me an opportunity to explore with you whether your brain was broken. Common sense, the rinja people's garlands, human rights, rationality, all the way up to me, i laughed and laughed at your humor as a bad boy; i thought, why did you put forward the argument that it was so silky that it didn't fit in with your time。
Now i think i know you, but i still think you're too stupid, too stubborn, and don't forget what you've done. You used religion, the bible, in commons, to lead american minds against the sunset empire. And now you realize that the time is right to strike again, attacking religion, attacking the bible — the enemy of the american people, the enemy of religion. You know how to be pragmatic, understand the importance of being ripe and step by step. And when it comes to practical principles, you're getting "no idea." "you are old and you do not understand the present, and you could have enjoyed noble life and heroic courtesy, all of which was given by most of the people of the faith you have attacked." unfortunately, you chose truth and sacrifice at the end of your life. This is the path you have chosen, and you have been vexed by the americans, and you have been strongly ostracized by the atheists by the feds among them. You were born in the early nineteenth century, and british journalists wanted you to come back, and the plan finally failed, whether or not because of the “obstruction” caused by the religious feelings of the american people, and you ended up in a tragic situation where the fate of the remains was unknown. Alas, you have contributed so much invisible power to the democratic process of human enlightenment throughout your life that, in the end, you don't even enjoy the fate of ordinary people. I really don't know what to say to you. But i want to say..。
You always said the age of reason would come, and now i can't see it. Socrates' "know yourself" phrase has never been out of date... And people have more than their own interests. As long as work is remunerated, the sense of historical responsibility of a person living is far too old for people to hide. It's as if good people are enough to be good, but not enough.
Because their lives do not consume their work at an equal price, and do they spend a penny on the rational parts, the scientific parts, the technological advances? There may be a corresponding contribution, or exchange, but most people do not, but just suck. At a time when the scientific tree's “stilling” is accompanied by world wars and economic crises, the world's people call themselves the masters of justice, as if they were the victims of this end, not the authors... No more words can be written, because mr. Pan, i am not going to follow you, i am modern, i am smart, i am selfish, i am insensitive. Destiny is the best choice for each other. But i want to say..。
I have to admit, the more i look at your words and touch your mind, the more self-righteous i am, the more impotent i can see the future of reason, the more incomprehensible and idealistic my soul is bound, the more silent my voice is in mind, but the more practical i learn to help myself and others, the less the age of complete reason... I don't agree with those who fight for women, who say it is a man, and who say it is a success to prove that they have made enough money. And i will not lose sight of those who are in great standing and who are raised by their families. There are those who do not have what they cannot get, and who try not to get it, they say, it's called oriente. I don't care about that. It's beautiful, it's money, it's status, it's means. This is the standard by which “society in this era” defines a good man, but for me it is not acceptable to me, but rather shameful to me. I was neither tempted by these nor moved by myself. I have my own evaluation criteria; especially for a good man. A man of great talent, a man of high moral character, a man of no fame, and a man of courage. Mr. Pan, you want to lead the world to a more progressive, rational democracy, precisely against the times. You have given up the vanity that politicians have dreamed of all their lives. You have lost the hearts of those who used to worship and praise you. You use reason as a weapon to protect others, and reason turns out to be the weapon of your own glorious life. You can look at it pragmatically, but before the principles you can become a knight. You're the one who stood at the forefront of the times and called on everyone to overcome ignorance, and that's the time, that's the people, you know it, i know it, with your insight, you know it..
So, thomas pann, in my eyes: you're a man
— to leave this night with admiration and sorrow
2015. 5. 27
