On 9 november, the beijing intellectual property court held a public hearing in the intellectual property circuit court of the centre for the protection of intellectual property of the city of beijing in connection with a patented patent entitled “fire plug”, patent no. Zl201080040132. 7 for patenting inventions. The case involved a tort dispute between a well-known foreign spark plug producer and a large domestic enterprise, involving a sum of more than rmb 5 million. Counselor chen jie of the law firm wei kaitai in beijing and patent agent guo sung-sung of the firm of intellectual property agents of linda liu in beijing attended the hearing as the plaintiff's litigator in the case. Nearly 100 people listened to the case online and on-line. Members of the beijing intellectual property court, vice-president and director of the department of political affairs, member of the beijing intellectual property bureau and deputy director-general, pan xin-sung, representative of the national people's congress, representative of wang young-sung, deng fong, chen zheng, zhao xiaobai, member of the council of municipalities, guo li-biao, and representatives of nearly 20 enterprises, such as baidu, chi hoi-tech, xiaomei, horizon, chishi chiu chiu-ki, and the same party, attended the hearings。
In the course of the proceedings in this case, the defendant filed an application for annulment against the plaintiff's patent in question, and the patent holder on whose behalf i represented responded positively, eventually making a decision to maintain the patent in its entirety, thereby laying a solid foundation for the smooth conduct of the tort proceedings。
In addition, in order to establish the evidence and improve the comparison of violations, counsel and mr. Guo singlang conducted an in-depth study of the case, carried out complex and detailed work on the notarized purchase, dismantling, measurement, etc. Of the products alleged to have been violated, and prepared detailed and easily understandable ppt presentations for the trial in order to provide a clear indication of the technical and tort ratio of the patent and the basis for damages. In the course of the trial on that day, we fully expressed the plaintiff's claims on the basis of solid evidence, logical analysis and thoroughness, as well as the styles of linda liu's intellectual property agency in beijing and wei's law firm in beijing。
