However, it is inevitable that there will be a light reading of the knowledge debris fast food. The expansion of big information, the acceleration of the pace of life and the widespread use of social media have led to a fragmentation of reader interests. Reading presents knowledge title, segment, instant feedback, content leaps. There is a pattern of dissemination and acquisition of knowledge information that is interpreted in a re-or more general way. As a result, while there are many points of knowledge available to people, they are becoming increasingly shallow, fragmented and uncertain。
Fragmentation of knowledge will fragment the knowledge of people and, worse, the vast, fragmented and easy-to-conclusive message, will allow people to eat nothing but chewed-up things without chewing, and wrongly assume that we have acquired knowledge, using “know” as “know” and “read” as “thinking”. Technically, from ancient times to this day, knowledge has been fragmented, but the size of the debris varies. While former debris was large and limited in flow, current debris is particularly fragmented, complex and large. In previous societies, the amount of knowledge was relatively small, people's mental and intellectual structures were relatively stable and knowledge changes and communication were slow。
In modern societies, the violent collision of cultures and ideas, the involvement of the commercial culture of a market economy, the rapid flow and volatility of information, and the emergence of a climate of anxiety and disquiet。
Attempts are being made to break the limits of one's own class in the comparison and climb of information, and while there is no way out, there is still a struggle, with an agitated, unsettled, unsettled focus. For example, “ten years of cold windows, knowledge to change destiny” has become a joke, traditional social upturn channels have been blocked, and most people are seeking new ways and shortcuts to the extent that knowledge of the secret of success is prevalent; and, because of the many attempts and the low impact of the effort, the short words and police sentences of the sit-in chicken soup have become available. For example, the involvement of business culture, the proliferation of covert soft advertising, the random interpretation and cutting of some traditional scientific knowledge, and the mixing of new knowledge with one another have led to suspicion and confusion。
Before that, one thing needs to be understood may be obtained through limited but relatively reliable access to newspapers, books, films, etc. And now, all of a sudden, there's a million ways in which the information can be smashed. Come here, and fish dragons are mixed, positive and reverse, leaving people in the middle of nowhere. In the absence of a knowledge-identification capacity, there is either complete suspicion or partial belief, but then new information emerges and the original partial belief is overturned. The pieces of information are variable and dazzling。
From newspapers and books to the internet in the early days, the amount of knowledge produced as the threshold was lowered, then without a threshold, information was generated from time to time, and the rapid pace of dissemination of that knowledge was largely incomplete, with no analytical inferences, but with simple statements and partial conclusions. In the mass of information, the amount of knowledge may be diminishing, the proportion of real knowledge becoming less and less complete. The systemic and authoritative nature of knowledge and the traditional nature of cognitive approaches have been challenged in an unprecedented manner。
