Debate material — whether diplomas represent a level of knowledge
Question: can a diploma represent a level of knowledge
♪ we're the opposite ♪
"by guessing the other side's point of view"
In our arguments, we have made it clear that the level of knowledge consists of both theory and practice, and is complex, diverse and wide-ranging, and that diplomas are a written document whose gold content is influenced by a variety of factors, different in character and scope, so that diplomas can only be a measure of what has been learned, not all of it, much less the level of knowledge。
Of course, we have never denied the importance of diplomas, which are known to be a part of the social search for jobs, but we can also see that job advertisements do not refer only to diplomas, but also to the requirements of all aspects of a person's intellectual abilities and experience, which means that society will never be misled in the selection of talent。
Therefore, we should treat diplomas objectively and not spare no effort to pursue them. Knowledge should be taught, not recited, for use, not for exams, but rather for the form of knowledge itself, not diplomas。
Although diplomas may be of some benefit to you, the stage of life is so big that knowledge, even without a diploma, can create talent. It's like qi qi qi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi
We are young people of the new century who believe that we all have vision and insight, that we will never be blindly young for diplomas, but that we will be able to improve our knowledge from a holistic, long-term perspective and become a full-fledged talent. Now, in the face of enormous employment pressures, if a diploma is kept and not moved forward, it will eventually be eliminated by the times; if it is obsessed with the mistakes of “diplomas that represent the level of knowledge”, it will become as sad as progress
Perhaps once, we were lost in our quest for education and blindly embarked on another course of diplomas, but now we hope that you will understand that diplomas do not represent a level of knowledge, and learn, learn, learn and go, and find that we are the richest。
A summary of the general points of the summary statement attached:
Error of the other party - definition: no real understanding of the concept of diploma and knowledge level, attempts to change concepts, confusion
— logical: proof of its point of view with a few examples of partiality, a leaf barrier
-standard: we think that diplomas are one of the non-decisive elements of the test, so they're not representatives
With basic knowledge of the subject:
Diplomas and knowledge levels are concepts of aggregation, not individual
Diploma is a written certificate issued by the relevant state department after the examination
Levels of knowledge refer to both theoretical and practical levels of a given discipline
The representative refers to the decisive factor, with or without other factors
Accompaniment card:
The social aspect of recruitment, even if it requires a diploma, usually follows a probationary period, indicating that there are many criteria for assessing the level of knowledge
If there are three doctors, how do you choose
Question on “representatives”: a good apple is a good apple, and sweet is the standard? If you have coloured and transparent liquids in two transparent cups, just look at them with your eyes
Diplomas are like “sweet” and “transparent” in both of these questions, and are only one of the criteria and cannot be a representative factor
A few additions on "is a diploma enough to represent a level of knowledge?"
First of all, i would like to thank all my friends for their attention to my article, which i sent to my blog in an attempt to commemorate my freshman year of debate, if i could help others. It is no doubt a great honour for me that these articles will now enjoy your approval. From now on, i will try to write about my materials, experiences and feelings and continue to post them on my blog, hoping that you will also continue to support and follow them。
Second, i have read your comments on the article " can a diploma represent a level of knowledge " , but it has been a while since the competition was organized. In addition to the statements that i have written, most of them are from memory, and the time is running out, it is now felt necessary to supplement the text to give those who need it a clearer understanding of our views. To add two points, if you think of anything later, you will be told as soon as possible:
The first is the question of whether a diploma is sufficient to represent the level of knowledge, and it is only for the status of the diploma to be discussed, and it is for us, as a counter-party, to argue that the diploma is not representative. The issue is usually pursued by the side, and the counter-party simply needs to click and leave it out of the question。
We believe that both sides should have a standard of judgement and be called representatives, which is also the key point of the confrontation between the parties. And the point of our attack is to represent the word, and in the cross-examination, we're asking questions about “representatives” and the questions that we think are the most clever of the contests we've been playing in the last semester, and they fall into our trap, regardless of whether or not they answer。
Finally, if you have any questions, i will do everything i can to help you, and you will be very welcome to comment on my articles. Interested friends can talk to me about various topics, hoping that blogs can become a platform for our communication。
