There is now growing interest in teaching and research on political economics. For decades, china’s economic community has been dominated by so-called western mainstream economics, and political economics, especially marxist political economics, has been severely marginalized, a situation that has long been a source of anxiety and anger for many scholars who insist on marxism. In the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis, the so-called mainstream economics of the west was in a state of great embarrassment and embarrassment, at a time when china’s marxist political economy began to rise up and develop its capacity to play a role。
The study of the political economy of marxism cannot, of course, be divorced from the focus on the capitalism. There are many areas and many areas where we lack a deeper understanding of the capitalism, and we still need to constantly study and dig into the theoretical treasures in the capitalism. However, in the face of china’s specialist socialist construction, we need to build a theoretical system of political economics appropriate to china’s actual reality, while drawing on the capitalist approach to research and narratives. This is also an extremely important task of our research on the political economy of innovation。
If we look at the whole book of the capital doctrine, we find that every chapter, chapter and section of it is being discussed around capital. Then it is clear that if we are to construct the political economists of chinese socialism, the structural framework of the capitalism cannot be completely replicated, nor can it be entirely centred around capital. With regard to chinese socialism, chinese scholars are very much in need of a comprehensive innovation in the study of political economics based on marx's capitalism。
Socialism had emerged from capitalism, and the economic construction of chinese socialism could not have completely removed or erased all elements of the process of capitalist economic development. Capital and markets, for example, are also elements that we cannot avoid or discard, especially in the area of economic construction, on the path of chinese socialism. It is therefore not possible that new political economics studies suitable for china's specialist path of socialism should not address such topics. However, while the capital and markets required by china's special socialism are closely linked to capitalist capital and markets, the differences between the two still exist and are sometimes quite evident。
In addition to focusing on elements such as capital and markets, we need to pay important attention to other elements involved in the socialist economy. Because many of these elements are as important as capital versus markets. In some ways, the importance of those elements may go beyond the importance of capital and markets。
For example, when we know the main contradictions in china's current society, we see this expression: the main contradiction in our society is the contradiction between the growing needs of people for a better life and the unbalanced development. So, should our new political-economic theory focus not on studying and examining china’s current main social paradox? At least, we should figure out how we can resolve and overcome this major paradox through the economic construction and development of chinese society. The main objective of the economic development of capitalism is to obtain more profits, that is, more residual value, which is due to the nature of capital. China's economic and economic development objectives should be very different from capitalist economic development. This is a fundamental difference and difference. China’s own political-economic theory cannot fail to draw a very clear line from western capital-seeking objectives。
The capital doctrine is addressed around the process of capital production, which is the process of capital pursuing residual values. The main objective of china's economic and productive development is not to make profits, but to improve the quality and level of the people's growing material and cultural life and to meet this vital need of the people. Such economic development goals have hardly been mentioned in western economic theory. This is actually a new subject for china's study of political economy。
If we are to be able to build an economy that meets the needs of the people for a better life, we must first have a sense of what we need to know or anticipate in advance what is needed for a better life, now and for some time to come. This requires a comprehensive, comprehensive, in-depth and detailed study of consumption categories at the national, regional, sectoral and sectoral levels. This is our preparation for economic work, and it is absolutely impossible. This research task alone is quite onerous and cannot be accomplished seriously. After we understand the needs and demands of the people in the present and in the coming period, economic planning is a task that must be done. The five-year plan that we now have is already at the forefront of today's world. But it is clearly not enough to meet the growing needs of the population for a better life. This type of planning needs to be more complete, comprehensive, detailed and thoughtful in the future. Of course, the design of economic planning cannot be separated from our important foundation of the current state and level of our economic capacity. If our existing productive capacity is not yet at the level to be met with regard to the needs of our people, then we can only plan more concretely for what we are now able to achieve and what we are able to achieve successfully, without leaving empty space. Of course, we have to do our utmost to ensure that the needs of those people are met, but we have not yet reached the level of economic production that is sufficient to plan for a longer-term development plan for further economic development and development in the future。
Planning is important and necessary in this process. But this is not a copycat and a copy of the planned economy of the past. This should be the formulation of more advanced and effective planning that can be undertaken under new information technologies. In other words, such economic planning or even planning is absolutely indispensable if we really want to reach a solution to the main contradictions in our society。
In such plans or programmes, the role of the market is not totally excluded. In the area of product production, = exchange and circulation, we are well placed to fully mobilize and play the role of the market. Markets can mobilize the motivation and initiative of many individuals to play an important role in the grand blueprint for our economic construction and development. Sometimes, such individual motivation and initiative tend to produce unintended results. Planning or planning cannot be expected or seen in advance. The role of markets therefore remains indispensable。
In the theoretical system of new political economics, much attention still needs to be paid to the issues to be addressed in the four main stages of production, exchange, distribution and consumption. In terms of distribution, for example, how to achieve common wealth and how to address equitable distribution is a major issue. Our study of the political economy cannot leave the issue entirely to the market. Markets do not solve problems of common wealth spontaneously. So we all need particular care and care in policy formulation and implementation. Since the formulation and implementation of distributive policies are addressed, the allocation of other resources through market-based means is also addressed. Distributional problems are not resolved well, i. E., the lack of a position in shared wealth, and other production, exchange and consumption segments are adversely affected to varying degrees。
At the macro level, our production, re-production and expansion require equally effective planning, and any blindness can pose problems and difficulties for our economies and production. Our business and management experience now needs to be refined and further matured. Business and management experience needs to be built up and practice is essential in the process. For example, there may be problems or difficulties in dealing with the marketing of certain types of products, so that we may not be caught in a state of emergency. While it is impossible for us to predict in advance the full extent of product sales, a well-prepared plan is not the same as it is without it at all。
China's economic construction and production depend on the hard work of a large number of people. Our political-economic theory must also be reflected in the logic and basis of our insistence on the working class as a leader. Without the motivation and initiative of the working class, the socialist construction of the chinese identity lacks the most basic impetus. That requires special attention and attention。
