Thesis on the new interpretation of the public law theory of administrative conduct — editor of the law thesis small executive summaries: the myth of japan's public doctrine of administrative conduct and the fiction of non-traditional administrative law is a fundamental and rich domain. Public force means the effect of a valid presumption upon the making of an administrative act other than nullity from the outset. The inevitability of administrative defects, the objective necessity of administrative disputes and the non-consensual nature of dispute resolution constitute the social basis for the existence of public authority for administrative acts the orderly needs of members of society are the rationale for the existence of public power. The public power of administrative conduct, which has the force of legal force of universal character, has different requirements for different objects. Keywords: administrative conduct/publicity/justification. In the event of a dispute between the parties to the legal relationship as to the expression of the intention, it must be submitted to the competent body for determination by decision. Prior to that, the party in question had no obligation to recognize and comply with that expression. If a party tries to express itself by force, the other party may use the right of self-defence that it has to prevent unlawful infringement in order to effectively defend its legitimate interests. But can this rule of law picture also appear in the field of administrative law relations? In other words, can an administrative relative refuse to recognize and obey an administrative act before it changes its authority? In addition, is it possible for the qin administration relative to be able to express his inner displeasure by acting directly against the administrative acts of the administrative subjects before the relief proceedings are formally instituted
