The revised ccp disciplinary regulation (hereinafter referred to as the ordinance) is divided into three parts, eleven chapters and 142. In accordance with the central requirements, the study of the regulations must be conducted in a comprehensive manner, in its original form and in its repeated form, in depth and in a practical manner. So today i will read out to you the original text of the regulations and their amendments。
I. General provisions of the ccp disciplinary regulations
In the general part of the 2018 regulations, a total of five chapters, 43, were added, 25 amended and 2 consolidated, compared to the 2015 regulations。
(i) concepts need to be grasped
First, there is the distinction between party discipline and discipline, and government discipline. The disciplinary action is prescribed by the party organization and is directed at all members of the party and is divided into warnings, serious warnings, dismissal from the party, re-examination by the party and dismissal from the party of five categories. Disciplinary action is the overall term for administrative and disciplinary action, and is taken by an organ or unit with managerial authority or authority, and is directed at the staff of the organ or unit. Government sanctions are made by the supervisory commission and are directed at all public officials exercising public authority. In terms of the type of sanction, the government's sanction, as in the case of the disciplinary action, is divided into six categories: warning, notification, overstatement, demotion, dismissal。
Here, attention is drawn to the impact and duration of the disciplinary action. The warning was a year and a serious warning was a year and a half, during which time disciplined party members could not be promoted either within or outside the party. The removal of a party post and a two-year stay in the party are not allowed to take up a position within the party for two years, nor are they recommended for appointment or appointment outside the party. Expulsion is prohibited for a period of five years from re-entering the party and from proposing or proposing to another party. There are also those who are not allowed to rejoin the party, which must be seen in accordance with the regulations。
Secondly, the treatment of party organizations that violate party discipline. The disciplinary action is a disciplinary one directed at all party members while the disciplinary action is directed at party organizations. This revision of the regulations has improved the treatment of party organizations that violate party discipline by amending the provisions of the former regulations to read that, in the case of a party organization that is in serious breach of party discipline and cannot itself be corrected, the committee of the higher party may, after verification, be reorganized or dissolved, depending on the gravity of the case. At the same time, a point has been added to this provision that parties that violate party discipline should be ordered to inspect or inform criticism. This is a procedural requirement. That is to say, before a decision is taken to restructure or dissolve a party organization, there is a pre-emptive requirement to order inspection or to inform criticism。
Thirdly, the distinction between disciplinary acts and those responsible. Members of the party's leadership are held accountable for disciplinary acts. This responsibility includes direct and leadership responsibilities, which in turn include primary and key leadership responsibilities. How? In our view, the primary responsibility lies in the failure or incorrect performance of the duties of the direct supervisor and in the direct responsibility for the loss or consequences. In other words, the secretary or deputy secretary is essentially responsible for leading. Second, responsibility for the failure or incorrect performance of the counterpart's work or participation in the decisions, as well as for the secondary responsibility for the loss or consequences, is an important one. If i were to be a deputy, i would not be in charge, but i would basically have to assume important leadership responsibilities in terms of participation and decision-making. Thirdly, a party member who fails to perform his/her duties properly or fails to perform his/her duties is directly responsible for the loss or consequences of which he/she is responsible. In other words, it is possible for the leadership to assume not only leadership but also direct responsibility, depending on whether the loss or consequences are decisive。
Fourth, there are three special cases of disciplinary offences committed by members of the preparatory party or party. First, there are two types of violations of party discipline by members of the renegade party: in less serious cases, the party organization should educate them or extend the preparatory period; and in more serious cases, their membership in the renegade party should be revoked. Secondly, in the case of members unaccounted for after a disciplinary offence, and in the event of a serious disciplinary offence, the party organization shall be liable to a penalty for dismissal from the party, which shall be decided by the party organization, and in the case of persons unaccounted for for for for more than six months, the party organization shall be de-listed in accordance with the rules of the party. Note that de-listing is not dismissal, but is a way of dealing with disqualified party members. Thirdly, what happens when a disciplinary member dies before the party organization decides to take a disciplinary decision, or when a serious disciplinary act is discovered after his death? If, depending on the circumstances, a penalty for dismissal is imposed, the party shall be dismissed; if the penalty is to be observed by the party (including that of the party), a written finding of violation of party discipline shall be made and dealt with accordingly。
Fifth, rules governing the application of disciplinary measures. The ordinance provides for five aggravating or aggravating circumstances, namely: coercion, incitement to commit a disciplinary offence; refusal to surrender or refund the proceeds of a disciplinary offence; disciplinary action after disciplinary action has been taken against a party for wilful misconduct; disciplinary action after disciplinary action has been taken against a party who has been found to have committed a disciplinary offence before the disciplinary action has been taken against the person; and the provision of the ordinance provides for disciplinary action. Among them, the non-payment or refund of damages was added to the amendment. If there are others who refuse to pay for their crimes, in the spirit of “sacrifice of one of me, happy family”, the punishment is heavy or heavier. What is a heavier penalty? The penalty for disciplinary offences under this regulation is greater within the range of the penalty. What do you mean, aggravated? The penalty for disciplinary offences under this regulation shall be increased by one step in addition to the penalty。
In addition, the regulations provide for six cases of light or reduced disposal. The first is the question of taking the initiative to submit myself to party discipline. Now, in some places, disciplinary inspectorates have issued circulars urging infractions to speak out about corruption and corruption in the area of poverty alleviation. It is possible to mitigate or reduce the penalty by giving an offer within a certain period of time. It is noted that there are two situations in which voluntary submissions are made, one before the initial approval of the organization, and the other when the organization is presented with questions that are not available to the organization during its initial nuclear and filing reviews. The second is to be able to cooperate in the process of organizational verification and the filing of a case to verify that the review was carried out and that the facts of the infraction were properly documented. The 2015 regulations provide that, in the initial verification and filing of a case, members of the party suspected of disciplinary offences can cooperate in the investigation and may be subject to a lighter penalty if they confess to the fact that the organization is in possession of their main disciplinary offence. This, unlike active representation, involves the detection of problems and passive cooperation in the conduct of investigations, which can also be light or lightened. Also, as a result of this revision, the initial verification was changed to verification and the case-in-chief was re-examined. The change from initial to verification reflects an extension of the deadline. In other words, verification includes but is not limited to the initial nuclear phase. In addition, from the central disciplinary commission to the central disciplinary commission and the national monitoring board, their responsibilities have shifted to disciplinary review and monitoring investigations. Therefore, the commission can no longer use the expression " investigation of a case " instead of filing a case. This is in line with the inspection act. Third, the prosecution of the co-accused or other persons should be subject to disciplinary action or prosecution by the party, which is proven; fourth, the recovery of damages, the elimination of adverse effects or the effective prevention of harm; fifth, the voluntary surrender of the proceeds of disciplinary offences; and sixth, other acts of merit. These can be light or reduced。
Sixthly, the process of handling leads, correspondence, preliminary verification, case filing and review. If there is a disciplinary problem with party leaders, how does the disciplinary committee look? First, the letter services of the disciplinary authorities receive the following information. These leads come from, on the one hand, telephone calls, networks, letters, visits, etc., and, on the other hand, from the patrols, such as the questions that the crowd has addressed to them. Following the referral of the disciplinary services ' correspondence, the classification summary was transferred to the former case supervision authority and is now generally referred to as the supervisory inspection office. In addition, the supervisory and inspection offices are responsible for other points of concern that have been transferred by the superior and subordinate disciplinary bodies in accordance with their managerial authority. The office of oversight then makes a separate opinion, which is approved by the main head of the disciplinary body and is handed over to the host department. This service is the original disciplinary inspection office and now the review investigation office。
The office of audit and investigations conducted an analytical study of four types of disposal. The first, the letter of interview, was to make the matter clear to party leaders in this way, on general issues. This may be done by the secretary of the commission, the deputy secretary or the secretary of the party. After that, the principals of the party's organization will sign and file for inspection. The letter is sent within 15 days of receipt of the letter of enquiry, and the signature of the main head of the party's organization is sought and kept for inspection. Second, a preliminary check that, if the disciplinary authority already has evidence of your infraction, it does not require a direct preliminary check of the interview. Thirdly, the fact that a disciplinary case is pending is not being investigated for various reasons. The fourth is to close the reporting trail that clearly reflects a false or malicious accusation。
Specifically. There were three outcomes following the letters. The first is the clarification of cases reflecting false or unsubstantiated information, i. E. Capture, hearsay, malicious accusations, etc. Second, in cases where it is true but the problem is less recalcitrant, the conversation reminds, criticizes education, orders censorship and discourages conversation. Vigilance is an educational measure and is not a disciplinary measure, but it is impossible to achieve a six-month promotion in that year if it is discouraged. Thirdly, in cases where the question is specific but the issue is denied or a clear problem is stated, a further communication or preliminary verification is conducted. Next, there will be five results following the initial verification; first, a case will be opened for review if the facts are clear, the evidence is well established or the evidence is incomplete but the conditions for filing a case have been met; second, a false or malicious complaint will be closed; third, reflecting the facts but the problem is minor, a reminder will be made; fourth, retention is pending; and fifth, if it is a violation of organizational discipline, it will be left to the organizational department. If a case is to be reviewed, three conditions are to be met: one is a disciplinary fact and evidence; the other is to be held accountable; and the other is to be pursued in accordance with statutory authority and procedures. If these three conditions are met, the host department may prepare and submit a report on the filing of a case review, which will be initiated after approval by the secretary of brokers and party secretary. The first is to declare a decision to open a case and to inform the family if there are serious breaches of discipline. Then, if there are more serious problems, they must be made public. These are the commission's handling trails, correspondence, preliminary verification, and case filing review processes。
Professor at the communist party central school of state administration
This is an excerpt from the monolithic article of the communism website. - learn from the communist party of china discipline ordinance 2018 (c)
