Hard core talk configuration, no ink. Hi, everybody。
I've had an in-depth experience of actual pilot driving. Starting with basic data, the power system provides two versions: the 200 horsepower version has a maximum power of 147 kilowatts, with a peak of 320 calf; the 250 horsepower version has a maximum power of 184 kw, with a peak of 365 calf. Both versions match the zefu 8at transmission box and use a vertical rearranger。
In the actual driving test, i focused on 250 horsepower. In the start-up phase, the engine can explode the biggest twist at 1300 turns, and the turbines intervene at a relatively early time and hardly feel turbo lag. As urban roads move, light-strikes can yield a good acceleration response, speedbox switching logic is smart and smooth. When i stepped deep on the oil door to conduct a rapid acceleration test, the gearbox was able to drop fast, jump directly from eight to three, climbs at an instant to over 4,500, and pushes a fairly visible back。
In high-speed segment tests, the back-band power reserve of the engine was also sufficient. Speeding up at 100 km per hour, sustained push is still felt, and over-traffics are quite acceptable. The official 100 km acceleration time was 7. 3 seconds, and my measured results at the closed site were generally consistent with that figure, with a slight slippage in the back wheel at the start, but the electronic stabilization system was timely。
In terms of fuel consumption performance, the wltc combined fuel consumption was 8. 01 litres per 100 km. As a result of a combination of road conditions, the urban congestion rate was about 10 to 11 litres, which could be reduced to less than 7 litres during high-speed cruises, and overall fuel consumption was consistent with the normal level of 2. 0t engines at this level. It should be recalled that this engine requires petrol 95。
With respect to chassis adjustments, the combination of double fork and multiple poles provides a good basis for manipulation. In the bend test, the side of the car is well controlled, the shift is highly accurate and the directional feedback is moderate. However, the comfort of a school-relationered movement can be sacrificed when it passes the road。
Overall, jaguar xel's power system performed fairly well, with good performance and a balance between daily use and fuel economy. The 250 horsepower version is no doubt a better option for drivers seeking pleasure, while the 200 horsepower version is better suited to the daily demand for power. The maturity and reliability of the total power set have been validated by the market, and maintenance costs are reasonable at the same level。
