The diplomas don't represent knowledge,1 his intellectual contributions are amazing, and edison hasn't graduated from the same little school as he did, and he hasn't done enough for mankind, and ford junior high school hasn't done it, and he's got people moving faster, and he's got people with low qualifications, and he's got people who don't know the truth, and he can't do it, but he's not educated, but he's knowledge. The second diploma only represents the height of the examination for a period of time. When a scholar walks out of school and continues to improve his knowledge, or forgets the original things... It's a great difference between war and war, especially when it's too long since he's gone out of school without further study, it's even more difficult to say six-sided views. The purpose of the diploma is to excite you with joy after someone else blackmails your wallet. Diplomas do not represent the correct level of knowledge. But in today's chinese society and even in the international community. Diplomas represent the level of knowledge. That is the only way to live in this era. Or you'll learn. Others feel hypocritical. Or, in a small circle, it's considered to be a "level of knowledge." that's why more and more people feel that they don't have a life in their arms, and the other way around is that people with knowledge don't need a diploma. But for the time being, the lack of a diploma is not recognized. I don't know. 2 diplomas do not fully represent the level of knowledge. A diploma is just a thing that proves the level of knowledge, but it's also authentic. But those who do not have a diploma can also go to those who have a diploma but have no knowledge. The level of knowledge is intrinsic. He's rich. He's still using his people. The official view is that i have a national computer certificate level 2 c, and language programming is better than none. But this isn't absolute. You can't say so. Because there are a lot of people who don't have a certificate and they know how to do it. This must be the main point of view. The importance of diplomas in the social sense. The first is to show why diplomas are important to society in which they are used. This, while we deplore the fact that a recruitment unit sees a diploma without competence, we need to admit that they do so for good. A diploma is an effective insurance ability, and a certificate that takes time to test is an instant proof of a person's strength without training or internship. And, of course, some of the people who have the potential but have no diploma are lost. But you have to understand that chinese people are too much efficient to ignore. So all i'm saying is that this is the way you're going to have to build your own arguments. Then the question of “diploma forgery” might be asked by the other party. This is a dangerous lid that needs circumvention. When there is no way to avoid being referred to here, it should be countered to its “fake”. Because the question you're talking about is whether a diploma represents a level of knowledge, not whether a false diploma represents a level of knowledge. And false diplomas don't represent a certain level of knowledge, and it's obvious that dads don't try to maintain false diplomas and you're going to be in a difficult situation. It's the logic of a white horse to say that a false diploma isn't a diploma, but it's the same thing as a father's. Don't admit it's a pain in the ass. I can add more concretely if i think of them first and again. Before addressing this point of view, let us start by identifying a few concepts for a diploma. A diploma is a certificate or certificate that is accredited by a particular institution after a certain level of education at a given time. It is a benchmark for the level of knowledge. A diploma is not only a piece of paper that emerges and exists as a product of the needs of society and as a corollary to the development of education, but is also an important yardstick for maintaining social trust. 2 items of knowledge. It refers to the extent to which a person has knowledge of the natural or humanities and the ability to understand and judge knowledge. When it comes to diplomas, people tend to be connected to employment. At a major job fair, we saw the revelation that “the priority given to the recruitment of a ph. D. And a master's degree for the recruitment of a public security officer in a province is the priority for the recruitment of a nurse with a master's degree and a university degree for the recruitment of workers with a university diploma ...”. So the effect of the diploma as a stone-throwing wall has been that chinese companies can compete for your personal level after the interview. This is the effect of the level of knowledge brought about by diplomas. And in the third floor, if a man with no diploma, even if he's so skilled, can't get a chance to get an interview like that
