In recent days, there have been a number of trades in the garment industry that have been exposed to secrecy, ranging from dress pricing, sales head-to-heads to clothing maintenance, and fabric maintenance, as well as numerous “rules” that consumers are convinced of, and that these purchases, and the small packages in them, have also attracted the attention and enthusiasm of internet users。
It is believed that many people have experienced a 100-dollar net t-shirt at the mall, which is dressed in the same way as dozens of dollars, but behind which there is a super-high premium, and the fabric cost of such t-shirts, which the insider simply says, is about a dozen and a half dollars, all the rest being brands and channels. Not only is it a shopping mall, but it's not a small amount of water, and it tends to cost less than half the price, and it's just a bill for traffic. The most important discounts, however, have been the care of the merchants, who have set the price at random, set a discount at a higher price, made consumers feel cheap, and even the “venom of the loss” that was so loud and sounded on the air, was not a real loss, except for normal profit payments。
In addition to pricing and marketing packages, various labels of the clothing itself are hidden. The clothes are changed several times, and it is not always the right way to wash themselves, mostly because of too little ammonia in the fabric or the poor quality of the fabric itself; some of the clothes are on the plaque, which says “not machine washing”, but rather because the business is afraid of the self-protection actions complained of. There are also seemingly high-profile labels, all of which are scavengers, so-called “hand stitches”, most of which are handmade in part, and not exclusively handmade in whole clothes; labeled “limits”, which can be added to the list whenever a good seller sells; and blackware, known as antibacterium and mites, which have only been tested with a headshot of ordinary fabric, with no particular publicity effect. Even some of the “free shirts”, which are chemically stereotyped, are not well-dressed, and many of the clothes on the market, marked as “deposit cabinets”, are exclusively imitated, and are not really a tailor-made product。
There are also minor problems with clothes, which are not simply thrown away, the wool shirts are shrunk, and most of them can be restored with steam stretches; the feathers are worn for long periods of time, and they are not broken, and then dry, so that they can restore their flaccidness. And many of the sunscreen suits that you bought to protect themselves from the sun are simply “false sunscreen” and are only fabricated and dark, with no actual sunscreen effect. It was even more embarrassing to buy clothes or return goods for exchange when staff said that there was no goods, no goods, and that there were often no real goods, but that they did not want to excuse consumers for returning goods for exchange。
These industries, which have been stripped out of their jobs, have led a number of consumers to speak out on numerous occasions, and there are so many unknown little packages in the process of buying clothes. At a time when consumption is becoming more rational, these pathways should be slowly abandoned by markets and businesses. How can consumers avoid the pits when they are tired of the garment industry? How does a businessman keep the bottom line of good faith? It's become a popular topic。
