Are you always troubled by "no logic"? There's a lot of thought in the mind, and the pen is like a "fluid bill" in the east; even though there's a lot of material, there's no organized article, and it's all gone down the test
In fact, writing is like building blocks, setting up the "bones" (logical framework) and then filling in "blood" (material details) in order to quickly write the high-column that is clearly structured and preferred by the examiner. Today, we share the skills of a three-virtual skeletal skeletal skill, whether it be a paper, a narrative or a narrative, that can be used directly to avoid confusion, and that can easily be used by newcomers
I. Prepared “core arguments”: orientation with a “said sentence principle”
Many people write in a confused way, rooted in a “undefined core” — where it comes from, it turns into a “mix”. To solve this problem, just remember the “one sentence principle”:
- before writing, summarise the core view of the article in one sentence, in the form of “i want to tell the examiner that by means of x, the y problem/achievement of the y goal can be solved”。
- example: “i would like to tell the examiner that, supported by the `total score plus argument', a logical writing can be produced”; “i would like to tell the examiner that adherence to reading enhances writing skills, starting with the accumulation of materials, learning structures, imitation”。
- practical details: this sentence is written on the top of the draft paper or document, and the entire process is carried out around it, and everything that has nothing to do with this sentence is deleted directly and the subject matter is avoided。
The log desk is covered with white paper, and the pen is written with a “said argument”, a photo-focused text that highlights the focus on target locking。
Ii. A further “logical framework”: two universal templates, directly applied
When the core argument is established, the frame “closes together” the content so that the reader can look down on you. The sharing of two all-embracing templates, covering 80 per cent of the writing scenes, is done as a book pack: pre-set core (book to be carried), re-categorized (framework to be built), final supplement (details filled) and one step in place。
Template 1: questions - reasons - solutions (applies to discussion papers, notes)
1. First (question): the use of scenery description to cause pain (e. G., “many classmates write with too long a mattress and end with too much grass and no focus for the examiner”)
Intermediate (cause): analysis of the core causes behind the problem (e. G. “the core causes are the lack of a logical framework, what to write, lack of hierarchy”)
3. End (solutions): give concrete land-defeating methods (e. G. “sharing three `bones' techniques' to help you quickly clear your writing lines”)。
Template 2: total-point-total-point-point argument support (for narratives, discussion papers, speeches)
1. General (preliminary): throw the core argument in a single sentence (e. G. “the clear logic is the soul of the writing, and the mastery of these three `bones' methods is quick to score”)
Sub-point (median): 3 sub-points + case/detail supported by each sub-point named after “keyword + practice” (e. G., “directive 1 & threading” — one core word at the beginning of each paragraph to enable the examiner to quickly focus; 2 + bridging `logical connection' — e. G. `first, second, last' — because, so, so,' to make the paragraph transition to natural; 3 : verified by `case' (a) convincing — each approach is accompanied by a specific example to avoid being generic”
- scene case: when writing “my life on campus”, the argument can be “class learning”, “community activities”, “teacher-student interaction”, which is guided at the beginning of each paragraph by a core word (e. G. “class learning, i learn to work together in community activities”, in which the structure of the article is immediately clear
3. General (end): summarizing core points + issuing calls for action (e. G., “in possession of these three” a skeletal `technologies', and the next time you write a writing, you make a point, then frame it, and you can easily write a well-structured high-council”)。
Practical details:
- controlling the division of arguments in the order of three, too many to appear messy
- each argument must be followed by a case or detail (e. G. “direction with a `key word'): when writing about the importance of holding on, the argument can be based on the need to build experience and the need to break bottlenecks. `assisting on achieving the goals', with one example close to the students after each argument, such as `assisting on writing a diary every day at the table, raising the text from 45 to 55 minutes after three months, just to keep her expression flowing'
- transition between paragraphs by logical connecting words (e. G. “first is to be done ” “second, we can” “last, there is a key step ...” to avoid a disconnect between paragraphs。
Transparent yakli constructs a “total-minus-total” structure model, with warm light to outline and metaphorically a clear skeleton of textual logic。
Finally, fill in “details”: 3 techniques to make the logic stronger
Once the framework is in place, the details are filled, and the articles are “blood and flesh”, not only logical, but also convincing and collection rates:
The case needs to be “specific to detail”: instead of “some effort”, it says, “the school masters of the class insist on reading for 30 minutes a day, accumulate 500 essays over a six-month period and write without any more sadness”
Language should be “spoken + short sentences”: avoiding long sentences and complex words such as “we should focus on the construction of logical frameworks in our writing process so as to make articles more coherent”, which could be replaced by “writing with a more structured logical framework”
Focus is to be “highlighted”: in the draft, the core view, argumentation, key method is to be underlined or coarsed to allow the reader to quickly capture the focus (the test can be “marked” in the mind, avoiding omissions)。
The handwritten card is systematically attached to the frame, the pen is touchy, the sun is falling, and details are presented to keep the articles alive。
Iv. 3 queue full of examples, directly imitated
Example 1: discussion papers (title: staying the cornerstone of success)
- the core argument (in a word of principle): i would like to tell the examiner that adherence is the key to success and can be achieved through objective dismantling, day-to-day accumulation, face-to-face setbacks。
- framework: total-point-total-point-point argument support
General (preliminary) “drill through stone and line-sawing out”, insisting on crossing difficult bridges and, above all, the road to success。
2. Points (intermediate):
- interpretative argument 1: the need to “target down” — to break big targets into small tasks and avoid losing them halfway. For example, in order to improve performance in english, a small target of “twenty words per day and one set of papers per week” could be set to achieve a gradual increase in the overall score
- subargument 2: the insistence on “day-to-day accumulation” — a common repetition can lead to qualitative change. English language class delegates insist on listening 15 minutes a day, and six months later, from class to grade 10
- separat 3: the insistence on “face-to-face setbacks” — difficulties are encountered to see hope. I tried to give up because of poor math, and then insisted on asking teachers a question every day, which rose from 60 to 85 in three months。
3. General (end): persistence is not an impulse, but a daily one. Success in the path of life can be achieved only if we are on the ground and sustained。
Example 2: bibliography (title: an unforgettable practice)
- core argument (in a word of principle): i want to tell the examiner that i learned to work together and to understand the meaning of responsibility and adherence。
- framework: total-point-total-point-point argument support
1. General (preliminary): the planting of trees on the campus last spring not only allowed me to plant a small seedling, but also to reap the power of growth in practice。
2. Points (intermediate):
Sub-point 1: cooperation to make the mission more efficient — i work with a group of three classmates, with digging holes, with seedlings, with water, which would have taken one hour to work, 40 minutes to complete. If they are fought separately, not only are they inefficient, but they may also sown trees
- subpoint 2: responsibility to make action stronger — i am responsible for watering small tree seedlings, observing their growth every day during classes and providing umbrellas for even the rain — which has taught me to insist
- separat 3: adhering to make the harvest more valuable — three months later, the seedlings grew new leaves and watched their own lives grow and thrive, and i understood the “pay and pay”。
3. General (end): the simple nature of the tree planting exercise has enabled me to learn to cooperate and to insist on responsibility. It's like a seed that grows the power of growth in my heart, and it benefits me for life。
Example 3: description (title: how to make efficient use of after-school time)
- core argument (in a word of principle): i want to tell the examiner that after-school time can be of maximum value through rational planning, prioritization and avoidance of delay。
- framework: problem-cause-solution
1. First (question): many classmates complain that the time spent after school is insufficient, either to waste time by doing nothing, or to be busy while being confiscated, leading to inefficient learning and undeveloped interests
Intermediate (cause): the central cause is the lack of a scientific approach to time management — with no clear objectives, no distinction between mission priorities, easy diversion from mobile phones, etc.
3. End (resolution):
- method 1: rational planning — a five-minute list of extracurricular tasks for the following day (e. G. “19:00-19:30 crossword, 19:40-20:20 calligraphy”) to make time allocation clearer
- method 2: prioritization - to perform important tasks, such as homework, re-study, and then to entertain and relax, using the classification of “important and urgent, material, non-essential and unimportant”
- method 3: avoid delay — set a “trigger bell” with a five-minute break per 25-minute focus, away from cell phone interference, and improve unit time efficiency。
Core summary: 3 steps to write a logical and clear text
Findings: lock the core with the “one sentence principle” and do not deviate from the subject
Bones: the structure is defined using either the `problem-cause-solution' or the `total-point-total' template
3. Fill in details: use specific cases, short sentences, focus, to make the content clear and convincing。
In fact, the logical framework for writing is like the steel skeleton of a building, which first stabilizes the skeleton and then fills with material and language, so that it can quickly produce well-structured and well-stable articles. Now try to use today's bones technique to write an essay you need to finish recently — what other logical difficulties have you encountered in writing? The comment section. Next issue of targeted dismantling
Author's signature: written autopsy room
