The well-known british financial times (hereinafter referred to as ft) published a male article two days ago, saying that it took a long time, using a high-end method, to analyse 140 million data, and to come up with an amazing secret that the share price of hong kong's stock-holders capable of generating thin film (0566. Hk) has risen dramatically every 10 minutes before the market is closed, and that there may be mysterious people behind it。
Last ten minutes, dramatic theory. The title is creepy and the conclusion is sexy. Unfortunately, the ft will never tell the reader another truly creepy secret: the conclusion is entirely hypocritical, because you can't get 140 million data for ever. It's a pity that the biggest data concept in the world has become a tool for ft to fool readers
Opens the ft article, which is full of various professional terms: 140 million data nodes, sql database query language, statistical programming language r language... For a person who is not a data party, even though he does not understand exactly what the ft is going to say, it's hard to see all these high-profile terms。
Unfortunately, after having been trained by professional data workers and media professionals familiar with the ft, it is true that the ft has been completely shattered. (or, in the words of the mediaman, the ft is no longer in control.) in the face of chinese enterprises, the ft is said to have been routinely discredited by some inexplicable concepts. It was, however, a somewhat symmetrical concept of finance, which was the most fashionable figure。
The big data is good, and 101 out of 100 people can say the last two sentences, considering the big data to be everything. But in fact, one can read. Each word of this type is understandable, but together it is a deep theory that is completely incomprehensible, and it is convenient for the ft to carry personal goods。
For example, the ft was very magically able to fold two years of trade data into one day, saying, “if a trader buys a hanese membrane power stock valued at hk$ 1,000 at 9 a. M. On 2 january 2013 and sells it at 3:30 p. M. On the same day, the hk$ 1,000 will shrink to hk$ 635 by 9 february 2015. But if he held less than half an hour a day, the hk$1,000 would become hk$8430.”
F. T.'s got a lot of talent. It's like helping cinderella find crystal shoes. With a big 140 million data that no one can trace, a last 10 minutes of "drill" theory was created. If you look over and over and over and over and over again and you don't figure out how to fold all this data into a day, you might think you're not having enough brain capacity. It's like the play in "smuggle," saying you're limping. The ft conclusion seems to be nailed: the tailboard pulls up! There's a mysterious force behind it. However, media experts remind me not to be blindfolded by the ft. Have you seen the increase in the price of hanan's shares over the same period
As soon as i look into it, it's hk$0. 35 on january 20, 2013 and hk$4. 21 on february 9, 2015, which is 12 times higher! Ft: you said that 1,000 hk$ in the morning and closing at 4 p. M. Became hk$8430. Where's the remaining four-fold increase
It reminiscent of the famous saying that data is mud, and it's round, it's flat, it's fart, it's fart。
It is a little comfort to note that there are bright people in the market. An expert in securities from hong kong, liu yianxiang, wrote that it took several days to attempt to analyse the content, “although data for five minutes per 25 months starting in 2013, at most starting in november of last year, there was also more than four months without seeing what they (ft) had said”
That's weird. Why did the ft take so long to make a false conclusion? A search was made of online reports, and the ft has produced more than a dozen negative stories over the past two months, with empty bodies behind it. Wow! That's the secret that the ft will never say
It seems that in the future it will be necessary to shine your eyes and not think that the well-known global ft is the angel of white clothes that represents justice. In fact, it could also be a black-hearted man manipulated by conspirators。
Responsible editor: zhang dei
