According to the city market supervisory authority, the shanxi market supervisory authority has recently published 10 typical cases of administrative penalties for intellectual property rights, involving various offences such as the sale of counterfeit registered trademark goods, patent applications without qualifications and unauthorized use of geographical identification product names, demonstrating the commitment and strength of the regulatory authorities to combat fraud and protect intellectual property rights。
I. Sale of counterfeit power adapters by a communications distribution department in the beizawa district of taiwon city case
In june 2025, the department of marketing was inspected for selling a power adapter that faked a “mark”, with an illicit turnover of $3425. The law enforcement authorities ordered them to stop the violations, confiscate the tort goods and impose a fine of $10,300。
Ii. The sale of a fake brand dress in winn county
In april 2025, large amounts of counterfeit o'kley and other branded clothing were stored in the party's warehouse, valued at $5,275,200. The case has been referred to the public security authorities in accordance with the law because of the amount of money involved and the suspicion that the crime was committed。
Iii. The sale of counterfeit tea and tobacco in the district of wuzhou city wine
The store was inspected for the sale of products such as fake wine, with a value of $2212. In view of the fact that the person in question has committed a trademark violation twice in five years or more, the supervisory authorities have imposed heavier penalties under the law, ordered the suspension of the violation, confiscated the goods and imposed a fine of $175,000。
Iv. A window company in schozhou ran a fake “hopo” chain case
In july 2025, the company was seized for operating a chain of false “hopo” trademarks, valued at $11,446. The law enforcement authorities ordered them to cease abuses, confiscate tort commodities and impose a fine of $20,000。
V. The sale of fake “spicy three” peppers at a tasting shop in homer city
The store purchased and sold chili parts of the fake “spicy three” trademark from the live webcast, with an illicit turnover of $20520. The supervisory authority ordered them to stop the abuse, confiscate the goods and impose a fine of $30,000。
Vi. Selected dilish equipment company in china case
Between 2018 and 2019, the parties purchased and installed appliances in residential buildings with a value of $102,000, impersonating the “delisi” registered trademark. The law enforcement authorities ordered them to dismantle the tort commodities within a time limit, to cease the abuse, to confiscate the commodities and to impose a fine of $400,000。
Vii. Sale of counterfeit “nike” shoes at a shoe store in yangquan city
The store was inspected for selling counterfeit “nike” and other branded sports shoes, with a value of $57333. In view of the cooperation of the persons involved in the investigation and the lightness of the case, the supervisory authorities are subject to lighter penalties under the law, ordering the cessation of violations, confiscation of goods and a fine of $60,000。
Viii. Sale of absorption bath products by a kitchen and distribution department in the tip of the lawn in taiwon city case
The distribution department sold the ablution products bearing the “arvipkw” logo, which had been declared invalid and similar to the “arrow” trademark, which constituted a violation. The law enforcement authorities ordered them to stop the violation, confiscate the products involved and punish the non-payment of $9810。
Non-qualified patent application by an intellectual property service company, shanxi case
Without obtaining a license to practise, the company carries out patent agency operations, charging a fee of $228. 8 million and over $210,000 for illegal activities. In view of its cooperation in the investigation and the refund of its expenses, the supervisory authority ordered the cessation of the violation and imposed a fine of $21,642. 27。
X. The misuse by a health industry company in shanxi of the “sunxie chen jealous” geographical marker case
The company makes unauthorized use of the name “sunxie chen jealous” for goods sold on the treasure-hunting platform, but the product does not meet geographical indications and is sold at $10036. 6. In view of the person's physical condition and financial difficulties, the supervisory authority is required by law to impose light penalties, order the cessation of violations and impose a fine of $10036. 6。
This is a typical example of the ongoing high-handedness of intellectual property violations in shanxi province and of the administrative penalties that guide market owners to act in good faith。
