For enterprises, “consistency” is the application of national standards of the corporate intellectual property code. So, what's the wrong zone in which intellectual property is consistent? A detailed answer to this question will be provided by the chinese editor-in-chief, in the hope that the question will be resolved。
What's the wrong side of the subject
Misdirection of intellectual property rights
The main objective of the error zone and the continuous process is to regulate trademark patents
Wrong! The main task is to optimize the work related to intellectual property in all sectors of the enterprise, not just trademarks and patents. The regulation of trademark patents is an important stream of work that optimizes the work of the various sectors and is an important, but not exhaustive, element of the process。
Misdirection ii. The value of the continuum to the enterprise is very limited
Wrong! Intellectual property rights have become one of the three main strategies of enterprises, not only to detect the dangers of each sector, to correct unreasonable and unlawful behaviour, but also to gain greater opportunity to learn about the subject, to improve on the shoulders of their peers, to learn more about their peers, to improve r & d efficiency and to increase marketing opportunities until, through big data, enterprises are guided in more scientific decision-making. At the same time, it can regulate the correct behaviour of employees, stimulate innovation and create a virtuous circle。
Mistake three. Consistency is fixed for all enterprises, and inputs are fixed. Who else can do it
Wrong. Different sizes of enterprises, different industries, different levels of employees, different levels of competition, former intellectual property rights deficits the target expectations vary from training, research, import cycle, number of improvements, level of mentorship, number of inputs, etc., and the associated coaching workload varies greatly. If a template is put in place, the input from each counselling institution is similar, but this only leads to the wrong direction for the enterprise。
Mistake four. The constant is expense. The less you spend, the better
Wrong! The point of convergence is that investment is in the right direction, in the right direction and within the right range, the more investment is made and the more it gets。
The key part of the govt 5 is to document
Wrong! The document is only proof of what is right, and the main thrust of the continuum is to identify problems, analyse problems and solve problems in various sectors from the perspective of intellectual property rights and, through systems, to entrench the right way of doing things and to identify and seize more profitable opportunities. In many cases, companies make mistakes without knowing what they are doing, employing a team of outside brain consultants who actually work with the company to detect problems and to specialize in analysis and problem-solving, which would be more than successful。
Mistake six. Is it a burden on departments
Wrong! While it takes a great deal of time and effort across sectors, it will bring added value, savings and revenue to everyone and create a situation in which everyone is willing to participate through the recognition of agreement through proper training。
Mistake seven. Once it's confirmed through the continuous calibration, all work is over
Wrong! The consistent benchmark is a process-based model of enterprise intellectual property management that needs to be managed continuously through a positive cycle of p-d-c-a (planning, implementation, inspection, improvement)。
This is what is written about the legal knowledge of the subject matter of intellectual property, and it is to be hoped that it will be of assistance to all. Chinese intellectual property gives you knowledge of copyrights, trademarks, patents, and chinese intellectual property gives you "lock"!
Relevant legal provisions
General principles of civil law
Article 95 [proposal rights] of citizens and legal persons are protected by law。
