In his capacity as lee jin, the paper provides a straightforward overview of the shallow meaning of the six earth cultural images in chinese thinking, directs the chinese high iron as the preferred option and outlines the reasons for it. The language is simple and straightforward, consistent with the chinese writing habits of “list view + short statement”, which are well below the 300 word limit。
Edit language
High school english is a habit of english thinking: chinese and english-language writing in english and its parsings are entirely in line with the medium-thinking english style of writing, with simple words and plain words, but there is a thinness of content and weak logical links; it can complement the concrete advantages of high iron (e. G. Speed, technological breakthroughs) with the appropriate addition of connecting words (e. G., and so) to make the expression richer。
A sense of logic
High school english is a habit of english thinking: chinese and english writing english writing and its comparison with chinese writing features are significant:
Fragmentation: there is no “general statement — argument — conclusions” logic closed, simply listing information in simple sentences, and arguments are lacking。
There is no depth to express: the meaning of the six elements is defined by nominal character only and the cultural/technical values behind them are not excavated; the only reasons for selecting the high iron are the words “facilitative and visible development”, which are not extrapolated by cause or effect。
Comparative english logic writing: compared to the rigid structure of the previous "perspective + arguments + logical linking words", this paper lacks causal chain construction and in-depth justification, prefers english to chinese translation, and corresponds to the writing character of the chinese thinking, "relational, light logical"。
Iii. A comparative assessment of chinese and english
English for english: writing english for chinese and english and their comparison
Based on a comparison of the four core dimensions of the structure, logic, reasoning, language, based on two copies of " sending earth's culture to space " :
In contrast, medium-sized thinking english for english-language logical thinking
Structural framework 1. Flattening of information: six elements of a simple characterization, followed by a direct characterization of high iron. No “general — segment — conclusions” closed, no improvement at the end and thinness. Declining layers: 6 general references to the selection of the high iron stratification to reinforce conclusion 2. Consistent with the english “view + argument + summary” writing paradigm, with the logical closed circle complete。
Logical connection 1. There is almost no logical link, and the sentence is loosely parallel, such as “it is fast and loose. It helps people travel economically.” this means, as an evolutionary extrapolation, without support
Argument depth 1. Substrate characterization, with only “fast, convenient, show justification”, no specific content 2. High iron value unmatched in other 5 items 1. Deep excavated “developmental mass”No objection of pointing source options the coNclusion that
Language expression 1. Direct chinese translation expression, single (mostly simple) sentences, high repetition of terms 2. Non-complicated phrases and advanced vocabulary, consistent with the chinese writing habits of “direct translation” 1. Diversity of sentences (fixes, words, inverts) and precision in the use of terms required by the subject. 2. Formal language and fit the space forum context in english
Summary
In high school english makes english thinking a habit: writing english writing in chinese and english and its comparison
The core features of the chinese-thinking english text are a heavy list of content, a light logic, plain language but lack of depth and connectivity. The english-language logical-thinking text is based on the logic chain, which, through the “total – total” structure, precise logically linked words, and stratification, achieves a clear and well-arranged presentation of views, more consistent with the rating criteria for english-language writing。
Edit language
The difference between english in high school and english in english: writing english in chinese and english and its comparison is essentially a difference in thinking: it is difficult to get high marks because of the problem of the “sluster, logical faults” of the medium text; whereas the english-language logical-thinking text, through the construction of a rigorous logical framework, meets both the terminology and length of the subject and the normative aspects of written expression. It is proposed that the text be improved by adding logical links and stratifications based on chinese writing。
A sense of logic
The logical flaw in chinese thought writing is that it lacks “causal reasoning” and “comparison reasoning”, which simply gives an opinion and does not explain “why the iron is the best”; english logic writing follows strictly the logical path of “advanced conclusions by comparing reasons for opinion analysis” and constructs causality with terms such as “comparable, lead to doing, be productive to”Ned completed the comparison and formed a complete logical closed circle, which is the core strength of the liu po colour english logical thinking。
