How can change be responded to? By using the short parable of “without two questions”, house has given us a thought of dependency, change and freedom。
“if you fall down, you rise, you rise, you rise, you sit, you end, you end.”
The micro-membracing continues to ask: “why did you just turn your head down, you just find yourself in the hair, you just sit and you stand and you stop?”
The scenery says, "search and ask."
The shadow answered, "these movements happen naturally, without going into details. Although i have demonstrated these acts, i do not know why.”
The shadow then compared himself with the snake and the armour. It seems tangible, but not physical. It said, "the fire and the sun, and the sun, and the sun and the night, and the generations."
There's light when i appear, there's no light when i disappear. My presence depends on external conditions。
The shadows thought, "well, that's why i have to be evil." and there's nothing left to do."
Don't you rely on other things, the subject on which you depend? Is there a fundamental need for complete independence and zero tolerance
That is why its actions always follow the subject. “i come with him, and i go with him, and i go with him.”
Here, the word "jeong-yang" is a synonym, meaning "showing, hovering" and "sun" without the sun, which is simply a reference to a passive and dynamic state of shadow)
Finally, the shadow summation: "what's the matter with the yang?" now that ben's just doing what he wants, why bother asking why? It's like we don't ask why the wind blows, why the clouds float, and there are things that work the way they do。
It is a parable of survival that is consistent with the words of "wind by the wind, the wind by the sound": knowing their dependency, accepting changes and complying with rules, should come and go, not being committed to change or lost in the process。
# national wisdom #
