Supreme people's courtIn order to further implement the constitutional principle of open trial, to regulate the people's courts ' participation in the monitoring of media opinion, to properly regulate relations between the courts and the media, and to guarantee the public's right to information, participation, expression and oversightJustice, formulates this provision. Article 1. The people's court shall be subject to public opinion in the media on its own initiative. People's courts should facilitate access to the media to hear cases, interview and report on the work of the courts and request relevant material, depending on the circumstances. Article 2. The people's courts shall publish relevant information to the media in a timely manner in the form of press conferences, press conferences, press releases, court communiquÉs, internet sites, etc., on cases of concern to the society and on major initiatives in the work of the courts, as well as other information that should be made available to the community in accordance with the relevant provisions. Article 3 - media journalists and the public may be present in public trials. Where there is insufficient space in the courtroom, priority should be given to ensuring the needs of the media and the close relatives of the person concerned. The tribunal may set up media seats in the gallery as required. Journalists should observe court discipline during hearings and should not be allowed to record, record and photograph without authorization. Article 4 judges and other staff of the people's court shall not be permitted to receive media interviews in cases under consideration. In cases that have been closed, the people's court, through the information and communication department, may decide to have the person concerned interviewed. The people's court may decide not to accept the interview and give reasons for not being suitable for the interview. Article 5. The people's court may provide copies of decisions, transcripts of court hearings, audio and video recordings of court hearings, normative documents, guidance, etc., if the media are required to apply to the people's court for relevant information in connection with the proceedings or other work of the court. Other publicly releasable background information and information notes may also be made available to the media if necessary. The coordination of the people's courts under the supervision of the media and public opinion is governed by the information and communication authorities of the people's courts at all levels. The information and communication authorities should provide the media with news material to ensure that the press reports truthfully and objectively on the work of the people's courts. The information and communication authorities are responsible for the timely clarification of the facts and for responding to the loss of real time in the media coverage of the work of the people's court. Article 7. The people's court shall establish a permanent communication mechanism with the media and its competent authorities, organize periodic or irregular meetings or seminars, exchange views and communicate information. The people's court and the media can study the development of self-regulatory guidelines for joint compliance. The people's court, as reflected in the media, is subject to opinion and opinion monitoring, and the courts concerned should study and improve their work in a timely manner. Article 8. The people's court shall promptly investigate and verify any problems in the administration of justice and other work of the people's court, as reflected in the media reports, as well as any violations of discipline committed by members of the judiciary and other staff. If found to be true, effective measures should be taken to deal with it in accordance with the law and the results should be fed back in a timely manner. Article 9 the people's court may inform and make recommendations to the press authorities, journalists'self-regulatory organizations or press units, if it finds that the media, when covering the work of the court, have: violations of the provisions of the law are punishable by law. (i) the disclosure of state and commercial secrets, which is detrimental to national security and to the public interest; (ii) serious misrepresentation or malicious tendentious reporting of cases under consideration, undermining the authority of the judiciary and affecting fair trial; (iii) attacks on the privacy and security of the participants in the proceedings, including through insults and defamation, or on the right to personal integrity of the person concerned; (iv) receiving requests from a party that distorts the facts, engages in malicious speculation, interferes in the conduct of the people's courts ' trials and activities, with serious adverse effects; and (v) other serious prejudice to judicial authority and affects the fairness of justice. Article 10 this provision shall apply from the date of its publication. 1. Clear basic principles and scope of application. In accordance with the principles of legality, timeliness and regulation, the entry into force of decisions at first, second and second instance shall be published on the internet. Cases involving state secrets, trade secrets, personal privacy, crimes committed by minors; cases tried in absentia; cases of unauthorized death penalty, etc. Ii. Establishment of organizational structures and terms of reference. :: establishment of a leadership group for the publication of decisions on the internet, which is responsible for organizing the implementation of decisions on the internet throughout the court. (c) clear identification of the responsible units and persons responsible for supervision, surveillance and content clearance. Iii. Regulating access processes. An application for the publication of decisions on the internet is pending. The presiding judge shall inform the parties of the publication of the decision-making documents on the internet by notice of the hearing; if the parties expressly request that the decision not be published, the panel shall, if it deems it justified, submit it to the competent president for approval; and if, within 15 working days from the date of the entry into force of the decision, the presiding judge, after deliberation by the panel, determines that the internet is to be accessed, submit it to the competent president or the competent president for approval. Iv. Introduction of appraisals and incentives. The results of the assessment of the online availability of adjudicative documents are entered in the personal law enforcement performance file and are included in the departmental end-of-year examination; the selection of excellent adjudicatory documents is taken from those published on the internet, and any errors in adjudicative documents are assessed by the steering group, which makes a decision to that effect. In order to better implement the principle of public access to justice, to further broaden the means and channels through which the people's courts are subject to social oversight, to increase the accountability of the judiciary, to improve the quality of adjudicative documents and to promote justice, this opinion is drawn up in the spirit of the henan provincial high people's court's opinion on the implementation of the online publication of adjudicative documents (the trial). Article 1. The following decisions shall be made available online: 1, 1, 1, 2, rehearing of judgements; 2, upholding criminal decisions; 3, inadmissibility decisions; 4, decisions challenging jurisdiction; 5, decisions rejecting indictments, complaints; 6, decisions remanding in court; 7, decisions giving effect to challenges; 8, decisions and decisions giving effect to review. Except in cases of minors, cases involving state secrets, commercial secrets, and personal privacy. Article 2. The decision-making documents produced by our court and delivered to the parties after 1 july 2009 are subject to publication online and should be published online. Article 3. For decisions to be published online, the contractor shall remove relevant confidential information from the electronic version relating to parties and witnesses. Article 4. In the case of a person who is a natural person, the name, sex and age of the person concerned shall generally be retained and the rest of the information shall be deleted; however, the name of the victim of a violent crime shall be replaced by the names “zhang xx”, “king xx” etc. If the person concerned is a legal person or other organization, the name, domicile, name, sex and age of the legal representative or official, the rest of the information shall be deleted. Article 5 the names of witnesses are replaced by “zhang xx” and “king xx” and the rest of the information is deleted. Article 6. Electronic versions of the instrument to be made available on the internet are uniformly named by the name of the case, which is described as “party+ case by type of instrument”. 3. Article 7 of the procedure for the approval and publication of decisions online. Article 8 the contractor should carefully calibrate to ensure the authenticity, accuracy and normative and integrity of the electronic text of the instrument to be made available online. Article 9 the contractor shall submit to the president, for approval, the original and electronic versions of the documents to be decided online, within three days of the date on which they are served. Article 10 the president shall conduct a comprehensive review of whether the instrument to be posted is within the reach of the internet, whether the relevant confidential information of the parties and witnesses has been removed, and whether publication is delayed. Article 11 where the president deems it necessary to postpone publication on the internet in cases of sensitivity, group cases or other socially influential decisions, he or she shall submit them to the vice-president for approval in a timely manner. Article 12. Where a party or both parties expressly request that their decision not be published on the internet, it shall be approved by the presiding officer and approved by the competent vice-president, it may be withheld from the internet for good reasons. The process of publishing decisions online article 13 decision-making after trial shall be submitted by the operator to his or her department in a timely manner, with a centralized internal register and posted on the website of the court. Article 14 the internal work of the department shall be transmitted to the website of the court in a timely manner, in both original and electronic form, of the decision of the department to make decisions on the internet. Electronic versions are to be submitted through a special u-disk。fifteenth
