The second box looks at the problem from a opposing and unified perspective, self-adoption, review of the 1. Paradox 1. 2. Paradoxical fundamental attributes (means of sameness and struggle). 3. Paradoxical same-sex and combative relationship. 4. Reciprocal and uniform principles and methodological requirements. 5. Paradoxical universality doctrine and methodological requirements. 6. Paradoxical lex specialis and methodological requirements. 7. Paradoxical theory and methodological requirements of the generality and specificity of contradictions. 8. To uphold the meaning of the dialectic of the ambivalence of universality and specificity. The goal of learning, the discipline, the goal of learning, the political identity, the scientific spirit, 1. 2. In the light of the current political hotspots, understand the dialectics of the main contradictions and the main lines of the contradictions (hard spots). The analysis of problems in life is carried out in a two-point and focused (focus) approach to awareness-raising and specific analysis of specific issues (focus). 1. Consistency between the two points and the emphasis. 1. Paradoxical contradiction (1): the main contradiction refers to the contradiction between the development of complex things and the development of things. The secondary contradiction is one of being unable to develop. (2) interpretative relations: main and minor contradictions, under certain conditions. 2. The main aspect of the contradiction is (1) meaning: the main aspect of the contradiction refers to the party that is in the position and role of the contradiction in two respects. The secondary aspect of the contradiction refers to the party that is in the position and is not functioning in the two aspects of the contradiction. Knowledge combing dominant decision-making, subordinate decision-making, interdependence, interaction, transformation, domination, domination, argumentation (2): the nature of the thing is largely determined. The main and secondary aspects of the contradiction are interdependent and mutually exclusive, and transform each other under certain conditions. 3. Methodological approaches need to be consistent and uniform. The two points of the dialectic are focused, not; the focus is on the two points, not on the two. Therefore, we would like to adhere to a combination of two points and focus, and to reject a one-point and one-size-fits-all approach to schooling. (1) the main contradiction is decisive in the development of things. (2) there is a balance between the power and position of the conflicting parties in the contradictory unity. (3) the nature of the matter is determined by major contradictions. (4) in recognizing a contradiction, the secondary aspect of the contradiction cannot be ignored. ( ) two main aspects of the main contradiction two main points focus on the idea of balance one point of view x x xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii) the meaning 1. Ii refers to the specific analysis of the contradiction, guided by the principle of contradiction, and the identification of the solution to the conflict. The specific analysis of specific issues is one of marxism and marxism. 3. Importance (1) is correct in understanding. (2) the contradiction is correctly resolved. Universality, speciality, the right approach, important principles, the foundation of the living soul, the key [linking] knowledge explores one of the main aspects of the conflict and conflict, and cooperate in exploring that in australia, flies have "go back to normal" and become friends of humanity. Australia has a large range of pastures, a small population, a high level of urban hygiene and little access to garbage and dirty materials, thus depriving flies of breeding grounds. In long-term natural choices, flies evolve into insects that suck on nectar and plant juice and can pollinate pastures, fruit trees and crops. In other words, flies become useful insects. The changes in living conditions have also made the fly “revolutionary”. Observations and tests under the microscope indicate that they no longer contain viruses and bacteria. Moreover, they no longer make disgusting buzzes, and their wings are beautifully golden and their bodies are large and beautiful. For all these reasons, australian flies have become a treasure among insects and one of the most important commodities exported by australians. Many countries around the world purchase such flies, either for teaching, scientific research, bait, or delicious food. (1) what, in your opinion, is the main reason for the “correction” of flies in australia? (2) an analysis of how australia's “correction” of flies has been achieved using a confrontational and unified perspective. Answer: (1) changes in the living environment, long-term natural choices, etc. (2) according to the law of material evidence alone, the nature of the matter is largely determined by the main aspects of the main contradiction, which has changed and the nature of the matter has changed accordingly. There are contradictions in australia's flies that maintain and change the status quo ante, and the power and status of both parties have changed with the influence and effect of the external environment, and the change has gradually increased to the main aspect of the contradiction, thus changing the nature of australian flies from pests to beneficial insects. The core interpretation of the correct distinction between the main contradiction and the main contradiction between the main one, the main one, the main one, the main one, the complex one, the main one, the dominant one, the dominant one, the secondary one, the secondary one, the subordinate one, the incompetent one, the secondary one, the dominant one, the dominant one, the main one, the main one, the “many conflicts”, the “many” contained in the complex one, the comparative one. The result of the comparison is that there is only one main contradiction and that there can be many main aspects of the contradiction: the main aspect of the contradiction is that of comparison between the two sides, and the main aspect of the contradiction is that of one side, while the second side is that of a single party. Both require adherence to the unity of the two points and the emphasis, rejecting the theory of one point and balance; the primary aspect of the contradiction is subordinate to the primary one, which contains both aspects, but the nature of the matter is largely determined by the primary aspect of the main contradiction, the easily incorrect point of error in relation to the main contradiction (1) cannot be considered to be the main contradiction. The distinction between priority conflicts can only be judged from the point of view of status and role, not by the order of resolution. Under certain conditions and circumstances, the first resolution of minor contradictions would facilitate the resolution of major contradictions. (2) it cannot be assumed that the main contradiction has been resolved and that the secondary contradiction will naturally be resolved. In the development of complex things, it is important to focus on the main contradictions, but it is also important not to lose sight of the minor contradictions, to be balanced, to properly address them and to prevent their impact and transformation. (3) nothing can be considered to have a primary contradiction within itself. Things are simple and complex, and there is only one contradiction within simple things, so they have only main and secondary aspects of the contradictions, and there is no primary contradiction. In april 2018, during an in-depth seminar on the development of the yangtze economic zone, xi emphasized that the key to promoting the yangtze economic zone in the new context was to take proper stock of the overall push and priority breakthroughs, ecological conservation and economic development, overall planning and long-term success, breaking down old kinetic energy and fostering new kinetic, self-development and synergistic development. This argument reflects the dialectics of () a combination of “two points” and “focuss” which are relative to the similarities between homogeneity and struggle; (b) an absolute four main and secondary contradiction, the main aspect of the paradox and the secondary aspect of the paradox are the interpretation of the unity of argument: b 14 is in line with the meaning of the subject matter, and the key words of “the whole” in the underlying material indicate that the dialectics are one that upholds the unity between the two points and the emphasis, and that the rationale is one that is the dialectic between the main and the main aspects of the conflict; (c) error, which contradicts the relationship between the same nature and the struggle is not one that is linked and separate; and (c) exclusion, where this view is not reflected in the material. Before he went out, he instructed his sons to write down the words of those who came to visit. After he left, four prayers came: the boatmen prayed for the wind, the farmers prayed for the wind, the farmers prayed for the rain, and the pedestrians prayed for the rain. It's hard for the sons of the landowners who don't know what to do. Knowledge explores the specific analysis of specific issues: (1) what is the philosophy of four different prayers in the material? (2) landlord, when he comes back, writes four words to his sons: the wind goes to the orchard, the boat is shaving to the river, the day is clear and the night is raining. The four different prayerers were happy and happy。an analysis of how the landlord solves the problem from the point of view of ambivalence is: (1) the paradox is special, and different things are different. (2) from a practical point of view, a specific analysis of the peculiarities of the contradictions, distinguishing between things of a different nature, resolving them in a different way and making a specific analysis of specific problems. The core interpretation - how to make a specific analysis of a particular problem - the premise that everything is realistic, realistic and consistent with subjective and objective specific history - is the materialist basis and prerequisite for a specific analysis of a specific issue. (2) key - to look at the characteristics, nature and specific conditions under which the thing exists. Specific analysis of contradictions between different things; specific analysis of the characteristics of different stages of the same thing; specific analysis of different aspects of the same paradox. (3) important condition - the contradiction to grasp things in sport. Everything is evolving, and the paradox of the same is different at different stages of development. Only by taking control of things in a movement can it be possible to reconcile subjectively with an objective and specific history and to analyse specific issues. (4) in analysing each particular contradiction, we must take note of its specificity “when it comes to be done”, all of which is time, place and conditions. A departure from time, place and conditions does not grasp the specificity of the contradiction. Typical example 2 (2016 zhejiang, 27) a municipal government has adopted a “one-size-fits-all” approach to promote the solution of the problem of “zombie enterprises”, introducing timely insolvency proceedings for enterprises eligible for bankruptcy, promoting merger reorganization for enterprises reborn after merger reorganization, and legally reclaiming land for enterprises unable to produce more, thereby contributing to the rapid growth of the city's economy. The philosophy underlying the solution to the problem of “zombie enterprises” includes () a focus on the main aspects of the contradiction while focusing on the main aspects of the contradiction. 2 specific analysis of the speciality of the contradiction is guided by the principle of universality of the contradiction. The material does not reflect the main aspect of the contradiction, excluding 1; it takes a “one-size-fits-all” approach. Different policies have been developed by different firms, and specific analysis of specific issues has been made,23 which is consistent with the idea; systematic optimization should be based on a whole-of-the-art perspective,4 which is incorrect. Knowledge systems, high schools, politics, politics, politics, high schools, politics, politics, politics
