Wearing your seatbelt is already the basic common sense everyone knows. Recently, however, a number of drivers have been suffocated by the fact that they had their seatbelt strapped to their car and had been texted in violation of the regulations for a few days. Many of the old drivers have been driving for more than a decade, and they still do not understand why they are punished for wearing a seat belt。
In fact, the problem isn't just "in and out," but "in and out." now the electronics are getting clearer on the road, and ai's identification is able to see every detail with precision. Today the matter is told in plain language, without bending or emptying, with the bottom logic, the standard of punishment, the correct practice, and after reading it, the whole family will not step on the pit again。
First of all, the core rationale is to check the seat belts, not for fines, but for survival. The law requires “the required use of seat belts” and not “the insertion of a card button”. The seat belt was designed through numerous collision tests, and only slashing across the shoulder, tweaking the body, easing the moderates can secure the person's seat when the brakes or collisions take place, avoiding impact on the steering wheel, front windshield or even being thrown out of the vehicle。
If this is not the case, the seatbelt not only cannot protect the person, but may also cause secondary injuries in accidents, such as strangling the neck and crushing the internal organs, which are more dangerous than not. This is the underlying reason why, despite wearing a seat belt, it is still subject to conviction and punishment. Next, the three pits that are the easiest to hit and the old drivers are frequent, each of which is realistic。
First pit: seatbelt through the armpit or behind. This is the case with the highest number of punishments. Many people found their shoulders tied, their clothes pressed and they were not comfortable, so they deliberately rounded their seat belts from under their arms and tied them to their waist. The seat belts were also placed directly behind the seat in order to save time, with only a card button. From the outside, it appears that it is, in fact, completely out of line, and that the identification of the capture system is a violation。
In terms of safety, today's minibuses are all three-point seat belts, with shoulder belts fixed to the upper half, and belts fixed to the lower half, which combine to form protection. Once the shoulder belts are placed under the armpits, the brakes drive directly forward and the head and chest are easily hit with hard matter, with very serious consequences. The traffic police have clearly stated that this line of law is tantamount to the failure to use the required seat belts, direct punishments for high-speed and urban fast roads, and fines for repeated discoveries of ordinary roads。
Many of the drivers had been planted on it and had been shot several times at the highway, waiting for a ticket. It is important to remember that comfort does not matter, that security is important, and that it is not time-consuming, costly and risky。
The second pit: a loose seatbelt and a non-conformity. A lot of people get in the car, just plug in the buttons, turn off the beeps, and there are several fingers between the seatbelt and the body, and they run around. Such acts now also fall within the focus of the investigation, and many of the owners of the vehicles have been fined for no reason whatsoever。
Why not? Because the seat belt can only be tightened at a critical moment. If too loose, the body slides forward when collisions occur, the seat belts do not function in a fixed manner and are not very different. In particular, the high-speed, fast-speed, high-impact and loose safety belts simply do not protect people. Now, high-cleaning cameras can clearly identify whether the seat belt is on your body, whether it's a scratch or not, so don't be so desperate。
The right thing to do is simple: plug in the buttons, pull the straps up and down, and put the straps on your body, without distortion, folding or relaxing. This would be both compliant and truly protective and more reassuring。
The third pit: i thought the back row was not tied, or just tied. This is the problem that many families most easily ignore. It has always been felt that seating in the back row is safe, that it is irrelevant, and that short distances are not necessary. However, in the light of current law enforcement requirements, the rear seat belts have been thoroughly scrutinized, both at high speed and in urban areas, in front and in back, and as long as the road moves, everyone should be regulated。
The law made it clear that the occupants included all the rear row locations without exception. Formerly dominated by persuasion, it has now been upgraded to strict law enforcement, high-speed rear rows are either off or irregular, with direct personal punishments, many are punished without multiple persons, and there is no “driver-only” “car-to-car” penalty for anyone who fails to regulate it。
Many of the cars had been closed by their owners, but their families were not in the back row, and they were caught, passengers received tickets and families were unhappy. In particular, it is not a small matter, but a matter of life, to take the elderly and the children out of the house, and to develop a habit of first checking their seat belts。
In addition to the three most common pits, there are small details to be noted, such as the use of seatbelt captors, card clips, which deliberately let loose the seatbelt; the pressure on the seatbelt under the buttocks; the suffocation of the seatbelt by pregnant women; and the absence of seatbelts in the back row, which are both irregular and punishable。
It is true that the current logic of punishment, which is not false or exaggerated, is clear. In highways, urban fast roads, whether drivers or passengers, where the use of seat belts is not regulated, penalties are imposed; in common urban roads, for the first time, the punishment is usually based on warnings of correction and repeated failure to correct or cooperate. The driver's duty is to remind the passengers that they are still not and that the responsibility lies with the passengers themselves。
Many people feel that the traffic police are being conducted in a strict and unpopular manner. There are too many deaths and injuries per year in traffic accidents due to the absence of safety belts or the irregular wearing of safety belts. Many of the serious injuries that could have been avoided were due to the fact that a seatbelt was not worn. The traffic police are not responsible for income generation, but rather for the most direct way in which they develop a life-saving habit。
A true understanding of the bottom logic would make it clear that the seat belts are not for traffic police, not for capture, but for the safety of themselves and their families. Drive on, risk everywhere, brakes, tailings, avoiding pedestrians, and in any event, danger. The seatbelt, on the other hand, is the best and most effective protection in the vehicle。
As the owner of the car, it is important not only to regulate itself, but also to remind everyone on board. In particular, there were new drivers, elderly people and children in the family, and it was important to clarify the correct legal system, not to regret it until it had been punished, and not to understand the importance of the matter。
You're not afraid of slowness or stability, you're afraid of carelessness and luck. Don't think you're a good guy, you know, you don't pick people, you don't see how many years you drive. Safety belts are the norm. They are responsible for themselves, for their families and for everyone on the road。
Finally, if you want to wear a seat belt, it's the right one. It's the right one. It is more important than anything to avoid these three pits, to observe the rules of exchange, to travel safely and smoothly, without points, fines or fines。
