Carnation tip: change the tone of the sentence
The missing components are considered to be missing, and the missing components are filled。
Second, it's not a proper match。
It is unclear what it is。
It's not appropriate to use the word. It's appropriate to replace it。
Seen as repeat or not, repeat words are to be removed。
Six readings of the sentence is contradictory and removing the shield。
Seven looks at the misclassification, different things。
Eight see multiple fixations, and think wrongly。
The opposite is often true。
Can't ten be okay, the one behind。
The numbers in the 11th sentence are subject to fine-tuning and the number of multiples is often erratic。
The twelve related words are to be matched with precise re-examination of the main language。
I. Main types of illness
(i) inadequate matchmaking
There are some structural patterns in modern chinese sentences. The combination of the main, the name, the guest, the fixed, and the six components shall be consistent with this structural pattern. Improper matching means that some elements of the sentence are not consistent with this structural pattern, or that it is not reasonable and reasonable to combine them, or that it is inconsistent with language habits and forced matching。
1. Mismatching of the main title. For example:
After the graduation party, the beautiful dances of jana, the beautiful sounds of music, are often in my ears。
The main phrase of the sentence, “dance stance”, was inappropriately matched by the verb “destroyed”, with the deletion of the words “pretty dance”, or with the replacement of the words “the beauty of the little arnab dance, which is often present in my eyes; the sound of the beautiful song, which is often surrounded by my ears”。
2. Improper matching. For example:
We visited the best practices of extracurricular activities at the brothers school。
The phrase is “visit”, the guest word is “experience”, experience cannot be visited, the guest mix is inappropriate and “visit” can be replaced by “learning”。
3. Inadequate matchmaking. For example:
Autumn beijing is beautiful season。
The main phrase of the sentence was “beijing” and the guest was “season”, which should be replaced by “local”. (or “autumn” and “beijing” would be transferred
4. Inadequate mix of qualifiers and central languages. For example:
I love this book because there are good illustrations。
The qualifier “excellent” in this sentence is inappropriately matched with the central phrase “images”, so that the word “excellent” could be replaced by the word “excellent”。
5. Inappropriate mix of terms. For example:
I trusted him and trusted his friends。
The words “because” and “and” cannot be used in combination should be replaced by “and therefore” or “because” by “not only”。
(ii) inadequate order
Improper sequencing refers to speech disorders caused by incorrect sequences of certain words in the sentence。
1. Multiple terms are in an inappropriate order。
When a sentence has multiple words at the same time, the order of the words should be set according to the order of the words。
According to the order of distance from the centre of the word to the nearest, several of the words are:
1 significance attributes or phrases of time or place (belonging to them); 2 table number phrases; 3 verbs or verbs; 4 adjectives or adjective phrases; 5 terms or noun phrases; (the term with the word “” should be placed before the word without the word “”。
For example:
She is an excellent language teacher with more than 20 years of teaching experience in our school。
The correct sequence of the sentence should read: “she is a good (verbal) language (noun) teacher (noun) of our school (number) with more than 20 years of teaching experience”
2. Multiple statements are in an inappropriate order。
When the sentence is accompanied by multiple words, the order of the words shall be arranged according to the law of the order of the words。
According to the order of distance from the centre of the word to the nearest, the number of verbs in order is:
1 for purposes or reasons; 2 for terms or phrases; 3 for terms or phrases; 4 for adjectives (table scope or frequency); 5 for adjectives or verbs (express expression); 6 for objects。
For example:
The parents apologized and sincerely apologized to him at school yesterday。
The correct sequence of the sentence should read: “the parent apologized (for the purpose) for yesterday's (time) sincereness (adjective) in school (place) and for his (object)
3. Improper order of pronunciation and central language. For example:
According to scientists, each bee makes a pound of honey, requiring approximately 500,000 pollen。
The phrase “500,000 pollen” is the term used to qualify it, and “powder” is the central phrase, which is clearly incorrect and should read “about 500,000 pollen will need to be collected”。
4. Improper order of stereotypes and narratives. For example:
On 25 july, local time, italian prime minister conte spoke to turkish president erdoğan, who exchanged a wide range of views on bilateral relations and international issues of common concern。
The word “widespread” in this sentence should be reworded to “exchange” rather than “view” and should be adjusted to read “widespread exchange of views”。
5. The verb is inverted. For example:
As a result of the inspections, a number of issues in extracurricular activities were discussed, identified and resolved。
The verbs “discussion” and “discovery” in the two verbs in this sentence should be reversed and “discovery” should be replaced by “discovery” and “discovery”。
6. Inappropriate sequencing of associated words。
It should be noted at that time that the order of the associated words should be determined: when the current last sentence is identical, the main phrase should precede the associated word; the current last sentence should be different and the main phrase should follow the associated word. For example:
If he is not realistic, his career will be lost。
In this sentence, the chapeau is “he”, and in the latter it is “profession”, which differs from the main term, so that “he” should be moved after “if”。
(iii) depletion or redundancy
1. Component disability
It means that a sentence lacks its proper content and affects the expression of meaning. There are five types of missing principals, missing words, missing guests, missing additional elements, missing associated words. The examination is often conducted in both main and guest languages。
(1) main language is missing. The most common cause of this is the misuse of the medium. In addition, there is a hidden change in the dominant language, which can lead to a deficiency. For example:
In the film, a contemporary intellectual image was painted。
The structure of the phrase “in” in this sentence makes the entire sentence devoid of the main phrase. It is obvious that “the image of the intellectual” can only be “film”, not “in this film”. It could be changed to “the film”。
(2) deficiencies. The lack of a word centre has resulted in a wordlessness. For example:
The chinese people are building a modern socialist power。
In this sentence, the phrase “to build a modern socialist power” is a medium structure, which can be used only in the form of statements and not in the form of words. How about “to build a strong nation”? After the word “powerful”, add the words “to strive for” and the words are words。
(3) missing guests. Often, the pre-penal language is too long and the centre language is missing. For example:
The group now has 11 professional companies, 2 research institutes and 3 production plants with a fixed assets of $85 million。
What is the phrase “of 11 professional companies, 2 research institutes and 3 production plants” in this sentence? After the words “three production plants”, insert the words “the large enterprises of the united nations”。
(4) lack of a qualifying component. The additions to the sentence are missing, missing and missing. For example:
Zhang zhang and li li won the championships。
The word “separate” should be inserted before the word “takes”。
(5) discrepancies in relation. For example:
Only adherence to academic ethics can eliminate academic corruption and cleanse academia。
After the word “elimination”, insert the word “only”。
2. Depletion of composition
There are generally two types of redundant elements: first, repetition; and second, sentences that have more than they should have, resulting in a lack of consistency。
(1) the dominant language is superfluous. For example:
The reason i missed the exam was because i didn't take it seriously。
The words “cause” and “because” are repeated. It could be changed to read, “i failed this time because i didn't take it seriously as per the super-dressing requirements” or, “i failed this time because i didn't take it seriously as the teacher requested.”。
(2) the term is superfluous. For example:
The academic work of this old professor can be excellent at home。
What is meant by "can" means is that one can, can, can, and can be, heavy. It could be replaced by the words “the best in the country” or “the best in the country”。
(3) the guest language is superfluous. For example:
It is only by reaching out to society and reaching out to the masses that the country's security and people's anxiety can be informed。
The word “see” in the sentence means “observation” and it is sufficient to say here that “observation” is not necessary。
(4) the additional ingredient is superfluous. The additional elements of the sentence are redundant, redundant and redundant. For example:
When electrical appliances are used, if there is a leak, the power should be cut immediately。
In this sentence, the words “if” and “if” are both intended to indicate a presumption and need not be used, and it is sufficient to delete any one。
Such as:
Since then, this house, which was calm, has been the scene of strange and disturbing events。
The word “occupying” in the sentence would mean “out”, and adding “out” would be superfluous, creating a problem of redundancy, and the word “out” should be deleted。
(iv) structural breakdown
I'm just saying
It's also called structural disorder. Combining phrases or sentences with two or more different phrases or sentences with different structures has resulted in a bonding and confusion. This is the phrase that is intended to be used, as well as the phrase that is intended to be used, and the result is to put the two sentences together and say that the phenomenon of the semi-transverse is the so-called chord。
(1) the two versions are mixed. For example:
Closed-circuit television, direct international and domestic telephone calls, sound, room bars, etc. Are available in guest rooms。
The sentence collides the two sentences together to create a muzzle. One is that “rooms, bars, etc. Are available in the guest room” and the other is that “closed circuit television ... Should be available in the guest room” and that both sentences should be kept in only one。
Such as:
All the stories are taken from the real story and the true case, except for the inclusion of a few art tools as a link to the story。
It can be said that “all stories are taken from the truth of the human being, from the true case”, or that “all stories are written according to the truth of the human being, from the true case”, but that they cannot be used in such a way as to create chaos and confusion。
(2) correlation. For example:
When the school announced that it had given us the task of caring for the widow and grandmother li, it was indescribable for all of us to feel proud and happy。
This “excellent and happy feeling” is the end of the preceding sentence, and the beginning of the latter sentence is the beginning of a series of interminglings that can be said to have “all of us had a sense of honour and pleasure, which is indescribable”. This situation is due to the previous sentence, which has not been completed, and which has been rushed。
2. Disconnection. The last part of the sentence is used as the beginning of the other. For example:
Dealing with the relationship between good people and nature depends on the power of the government, while not acting as an alternative to civil power in the mobilization of public opinion, monitoring and inspection。
“civil power” is a guest in the preceding part, and the entire sentence is complete, but the addition of the “role in public opinion” section makes it the main part of the sentence, and the whole sentence is in disarray. In order to highlight “civil forces”, it could be broken from behind and then added “civil forces” before “the role of public opinion”, making the entire sentence two sentences。
3. Way to go. Half a sentence is said, and suddenly a different stove is set up. For example:
