Liang wendo's common sense book
After a well-known book, there must be a lot of thoughts about life or things, and it is time to keep a serious record and write a book. In order to stop the headache of writing books and notes, the following is a copy of the liang dynasty book for you (selecting six books) for your information, in the hope of helping friends in need。
Liang wendo's common sense notes1
Liangwondo's commons is a book of current affairs reviews, each of which is a review of current affairs published in newspapers or on the internet. I wonder if it was because mr. Leung was born in hong kong that his current affairs reviews made me feel different from those written by mainland journalists. Although 90 per cent or more of the articles in the book are commenting on hotspot events in mainland china, the perspective of mr. Liang's observations and the language used make me feel different. He would be in a position to comment, to reflect, to appeal in a language that no one else had ever noticed. What the book commons brought me was to take a more different and deeper look at an event, a character, a society. Excavating, thinking about what is missing behind social hotspots, but vitally important. Mr. Leung stated in his own order: “i would go to a hong kong commentator whose greatest sin was not really a ‘slave mentality’, but rather a relatively superior space. My environment is more relaxed than many of my peers, my sources of information are more diverse, my risks are smaller and my fears less.” so for me (or for us) as a youth of the continent, the book commons is a novelty to find out what we have not seen, what our continental journalists have not explored, the warning and reflection behind social hotspot events。
The most impressive part of the book is mr. Liang wendo's comments on the events that i have known, because he has drawn my attention to something deeper and more essential behind the events that i have known. And that's all i've never thought about. His current state of affairs has really made me feel that i used to look too superficial. Even the vast majority of society is too superficial. Liang wendo also mentioned in his own order that one of his aspirations is to have the ability of society to think independently. And that is the very important point that i realized after reading commons. It is hoped that in the future, it will be possible to improve its ability to think independently, to have an idea of its own, to be taken away from public opinion and to think rationally about what happens in society。
What touched me most in the book was mr. Liang's analysis of the country's vendettas. The phenomenon cited in mr. Liang's book does exist in society and is still common. There have always been rumours on the internet about how foreigners denigrate china's vilification of chinese; or about the clandestine admission of some big stars to foreign nationality, or about earthquakes and non-contributions. Mr. Liang described such acts as “self-abuse”. I am deeply touched by this comment because it is really... Too common on the internet, but i have always looked at the “news” with a lively mind and never thought about what's behind them. Mr. Liang's explanation of the reasons for such “self-abuse” is a lack of self-confidence in our country. It's like couples expect vows and promises over and over again to make sure they don't betray. It seems that we will not stop until we really get an apology from japan for china, and we hear first-hand from the stars the clarification of their nationality and the disclosure of the amount of their contributions. Lack of self-confidence and doubt will lead us to prejudice and demand against others. While china’s combined power has increased so long after the end of the fighting, the country’s people still lack self-confidence and self-esteem. And, for example, in the long history of china and japan, mr. Liang raises the question: who are we to counter? We chinese have always customarily understood japan's crimes of that year narrowly as hatred between the two peoples of china, but the essence of japan's aggression is a crime against humanity that afflicts east asia as a whole. That is why japan can have the courage to blatantly deny the fact that it has invaded china, to tamper with history textbooks and even to claim that aggression against asia is in fact the liberation of asia. I have never thought about this aspect of the chinese-japanese paradox。
The book also contains many hot spots from earlier years. Like the wenchuan earthquake, the olympic games, china's threat of government specials, urban law enforcement, etc. There's a lot of blood to read. These reviews have made me realize that since the reform and opening up, china has grown rapidly and its development potential cannot be underestimated. But behind the rapid development and prosperity are too many problems to ignore. Such as inadequate systems, declining moral qualities of the population, backwardness in cultural education, etc. But there are many things that please me, because i find that many of mr. Leung's reviews are in years. More than a decade has passed, and many of the issues written in the book have now improved as i can see. This shows that both the government and society are aware of the problems behind the rapid development of the country and are trying to correct some of the errors and improve some of the systems. Despite the many shortcomings in our society, i am confident in the future development of our country because i see change and i see effort。
Mr. Leung's own sequence resonates with me: “any conscientious commentator should expect his articles to fail, and it would be sad if they were always relevant.” reading commons, i learned about reason, deep, independent thinking. It was to be hoped that, in the future, when they saw the news on the internet, they would no longer be held by public opinion and would no longer be visible。
Liang wendo's general knowledge note 2
I always envy those commentators when they look at review books or web pages, and they always use fancy words to construct a philosophically profound article, and there's always a lot of new principles i've never heard of, and there's always a lot of deep reasons i can't think of. This is the case of li yu chun, zheng ke, and liu, whose ideology can be exploited in the country, because of the social division of labour, which has led to the convergence of human evolution, all of which i am foolishly unable to see but only the deliberate charlatan behind it, the media’s contribution, the fact that lee, zeng, and liu are simply a long-standing group of people in society, amplified by the modern media, as if experts had forgotten that most of the horns of china’s plays are male and some perform more traditional cultural elements than women。
“i don't understand”, an assessment that many authors seem to like a compliment, one in which he knows that the reader's culture is not good enough, the other in which he thinks that he does have a deep mind, that he doesn't have any obscurantism, and that i secretly resolve to make “i don't understand” the highest goal i've ever pursued in my writing, but when i finish reading liang's common sense, a feeling that has been so long and infamous has suddenly appeared to me in the form and clearness of the simplest things that are often of the greatest value to me
This book of liangwondo commons is a collection of his current affairs reviews, one of the american founding documents, commons by thomas pan. Every social hotspot in the book speaks for himself, but unlike some of the comments, there is little incongruity and insinuity in his view, which is “common sense” as we know it. He said, for example, that “the logic of collective civil mobilization, even though the volunteers are being evaluated for their relief operations, is not satisfied with the fact that it is the height of cultural differences between the middle and the west, and then the genetic essence of the wigand love culture”. Seeing it here, you'll probably understand the complaints at the beginning of my article。
Common sense is today a luxury quest. While it is common sense to adhere to the most basic academic ethics, it is not uncommon for all kinds of learning to pretend; it is common knowledge for all professions to adhere to their own professional norms, but it is not sufficient for all to be exposed; it is common knowledge for everyone to comply with the law, and there are countless “relations” of “substantial rules”. The same is true of articles that need to be deep, that need to be superficial, that seek to be profound, and that fear that they may be alienated from common sense, just as there is an easy-to-understand poem in ancient poetry, and a hard-to-understand poem in lee。
It's hard to say even simple things are worth writing about. For, unless you can have a `punishable pen like luxur, unless you are as wise as the book, or as smart as the current korean cold or liangwondo, or you are a celebrity in the media, many of the comments are nothing but a reward for yourself. Now there are so many newspapers, so many blogs, so many wonderful words, who cares about the so-called reviews you write. It is no one who cares, who inspires me to write, because no one will come out and laugh at your simplicity and at you, "the wall of shit cannot be broken," so go on。
Liang wendo's general knowledge note 3
There is an old chinese saying: “the authorities are obsessed, the observers are clear.” however, when the world is united and each of us in the game, does that mean that no one can have clear eyes
Fortunately, when i finished reading commons, i was sure to say, not. At the very least, there is a man who, even in the world's big picture, can see the essence of everything, and he is liang mando。
It is, by definition, a review of the phenomenon of the times, which can easily be reminiscent of short-lived newspapers, as if after this period they were backward and worthless。
Is that true? Take as an example one of the words of " the concept of city management dying in abstract form " , which, as we all speak of brutal law enforcement across the country, lays the roots of this phenomenon in a few hundred words of sharpness. To put it simply, it is a clash between idealism and realism, which blinds us when we are dedicated to building modern cities, and when our government is making great efforts to deal with so-called “illegal traffickers”, so that they ignore the mindset of citizens in reality: if there's a place where goods are cheaper, why don't i go buy them? In fact, our leaders see people as the cold models on the urban plans that forget human needs and the needs of life。
Let us think again, is this idealism really only in this respect? In fact, which is not the product of a ridiculous idealism? Why does china’s annual ... GDP growth make the world envious and still unable to remove the hats of developing countries? We are increasingly losing sight of the importance of reality in our fast-paced development, lying in the cradle of idealism, with a higher heart and a lower life than paper。
Now, do you still think it doesn't have a lasting meaning? Times reviews, like literature, are full of reflections about the times. The difference is that it is more realistic, closer to the phenomenon of life, and more nuanced language that reveals and refutes the problems of the present world. Perhaps the events in it are time-bound, but the underlying ideas are never obsolete。
When we live in a restless society, you need a book like " common sense " , which shines out your obnoxious eyes, your undiscovered thoughts, and keeps you awake in the bureau。
Liang mando's common sense notes 4
Although it was only a booklet, its content was substantial enough to carry an immeasurable historical significance. The book, which was described as a textbook of the united states independence revolution and which had been repeatedly defeated and demoralized during the war of independence, immediately changed the circumstances of the war at that time, to the point that it had won the battle of trenton in 1776. Even washington acknowledged that the book had caused a great change in many minds, including himself. Many historians have also found that the democratic principles highlighted in the declaration of independence have long been highlighted and articulated in the common sense booklet。
In the preamble, pan spoke passionately and generously: by razing a country to waste by fire and sword, he openly challenged the common and inherent rights of humanity and intended to destroy the defenders of human rights, a concern shared by everyone with feelings and reason. At the beginning of the book, the author did not call upon the people to rise up against british colonial rule, but rather to set out the principles of government formation by stating the common sense of its origin and composition, and then to refer to the shortcomings of the british system of government, arguing that british monarchy and hereditaryism did not embody the idea of equality and did not guarantee the freedom and security of the people。
That is why he believes that the so-called argument is meaningless and that only by taking up arms to solve the problem will a new `political era ' and a new way of thinking be opened. “only independence, i. E. The establishment of a continental form of government, can guarantee peace on the continent and ensure that she is protected from civil war”. And he has shown, through debt data and equipment calculations, a description of the future system, as well as images and metaphors, that the attainment of independence in the americas is not as difficult as it would have been, and that we have the strength and motivation to win. This rhetoric by this radical is a major inspiration for morale and has been instrumental in the success of the american war on independence。
Liang wendo's learned to read 5
Common sense, as we define it, is knowledge that is well known, need not be interpreted or justified, and, for the authors of the commentary, the process of writing comments is a constant process of reaffirming common sense. The book commons is a collection of comments made by mr. Liang wendo in both places, each of which is as direct and powerful as the swordsman. Such unique insights and intellectual wisdom are rare。
On some issues, some of our experts prefer to be deep-seated in order to be able to grasp the essence in its entirety, and do not stop without explaining a myriad of incomprehensible arguments, and do not solve any practical problems. In fact, what the public demands is not so much, it's just plain sense that everyone understands, so we would like to emphasize “common sense”。
Common sense, from before to now, never again. Nevertheless, it was felt that not enough had been done, because there was too much to say and much to stress, and since there were very few people in each era who were responsible for reaffirming common sense and too many audiences, some common sense needed to be repeated again and again。
Mr. Liang wendao stated in his own sequence that if the `purpose ' of the current review is to change reality, then the most ironic is its persistence. There are countless examples of this, problems with mines, food security, etc., and commentators from all walks of life have reached a state of silence, but things continue to happen. It is not a matter of common sense reaffirming that it is not in place, nor of commentators, but of humanity. If people still live so stubbornly for their own benefit, it will not help even if common sense is reaffirmed many times。
Liang mando's common sense notes 6
Mr. Liang's work has only recently been read, from common sense to me reading, to taste, which is deeply convinced by his writings and logic。
Mr. Leung must have stored in his belly an infinity of knowledge, or could he have written an article in which he believed in the past, and learned from china and the west, remember reading the first article of tasty, reading the idea of the article, which went from simple eating to the greek tradition of democratic politics, leaping into the order of animal meals, turning the pen, and then jumps back to the moment, without any contradiction. If it were written by itself, it would probably turn into a dry discussion, with no example to support the argument, and probably with no interest from the reader. It is to be hoped that more attention will be paid in the course of future reading to this example, which, at least, would be a little more informative。
Another aspect is that mr. Liang is impartial in his arguments and is in a neutral position to express his views, which is completely different from the reading of ma jiahu's work. When reading ma jia fai's work, he felt that he had shown a sort of pride in hong kong people and ridiculed the mainlanders, even though his compatriots were good and bad, he felt uncomfortable reading it from that angle. But mr. Liang's work does not have this sense of hong kong-style arrogance, which is probably the real elite. I remember one of them who said that hong kongers had been under british colonial rule for so long that they had not learned to be a low-key english gentleman and that, in conjunction with `press reports' of the previous period, such comments were still valid at the moment. It is also a skill that needs to be learned. It is important not to be in a high position, but to be comfortable。
The book was read in a way that was old, too fast for a complete copy. I'll read it like this later. I'll have to punch you。
Slow down, slow down, fine taste。
I also want to read mr. Leung's work and love his style。
