Liang's book is written in liang's book, page/numpages' book is written in liang's book. The following is a copy of the book for your knowledge. The intention is to write a few words about your reading, which is a part of your work. But some gossip, because when i look over and talk about books and maybe a page, i always envy those that talk about, and they can always use fancy words to come up with an incisive article, and there's always a lot of new ideas i've never heard of, and there's always a lot of deep reasons i can't think about. Such as the burning events of the royu feng at this time, where the ideology of the national class can be exploited, the phenomenon of lee woo chun, zeng ko and liu is due to the social division of labour that has led to a convergence of human evolution, and so on, which i am foolishly only to the extent that i am the deliberate charlatanism behind royu feng, and the media's support wave, which sees only lee, tseng and liu, who are long-standing members of society, amplified by the modern media, is a matter of concern that experts have forgotten that most of the horns of the chinese drama are male-styled and that some of them are more traditional cultural elements than women. “i don't get it”, which many writers seem to say is a reward, because he will recognize that the reader's culture is inadequate, and he will feel that he really has a deep mind, that he doesn't have a borgian accent, and i will be confident that i can't understand it as the ultimate goal of my writing, but when i finish reading leung's book, a feeling that has been so long and unrenown has suddenly developed and made clear to me that the simplest thing is often of value to me, and why do i have to follow things that look good? The book of liangwondo, " knowledge " , is a collection he talks about for some time. The title of the book is " knowledge " , one of the united states ' definitive documents. And every social hotspot in the book that he says about himself, but unlike some of the conversations, there is little in the depths of his insights that we know well. He said, for example, “it is clear that the logic of collective mobilization of civil society is not enough to talk about the response of volunteers, and that if it is to the other heights of western and central culture, then it is to be drawn to the genetic essence of the huaihai culture.” seeing here, you probably understand the complaints at the beginning of my article. “knowledge” is today somehow a luxury. It is clear that adherence to the most basic academic ethics is knowledge, and that all kinds of academic fabrications are not only forbidden; it is clear that compliance with their own industry norms is knowledge, but all sorts of insiders are exposed; it is clear that discipline for all is knowledge, and the “substantial rules” of “relations” are numerous. The articles are the same: they need to be deep, they need to be simple, they need to be simple, they need to be simple, they need to be clever, and they are afraid to deviate from their knowledge, just as the ancient poems contain hard-to-understand poems, and they are complemented by the hard-to-understand poems of lee. It's not possible to write something that's good, even if it's simple. Because unless you can have a pen like luxur, unless you're as smart as the money book, maybe as smart as the korean cold or liang, or maybe you're a celebrity in the press around the corner, and you're afraid of talking a lot about what you think is too much. So many newspapers, so many blogs, so many wonderful words, who cares about the so-called talk you're writing. It's nobody who cares, who inspires my courage to keep writing, because no one will come out and sarcastic about your simplicity and the fact that you can't make a wall of shit, so just write it down. Nationalists often have well-defined judgments and feelings about patriots and traitors, often neglecting their original intentions and mentalities, and relying only on results and behaviour. What's wrong with this is that it takes a rather simple dualistic view of good and evil, ignoring the complexity of reality. For example, there were a lot of amateurs in shanghai during the war years who were forced to kill in times of bad income, and if they fail, they become martyrs for nothing. There is also a “professional revolutionaries” who are not so patriotic, but rather for their lives, and whom the revolution is not a passion for blood, but a profession, but a respectable one. On the other hand, some of the traitors say they're more likely than they want to profit. In both cases, patriotism and treason are non-existent, some are interests and some live, but the way they profit happens to involve the state. It is therefore too crude to rely only on behaviour to distinguish between patriotism. For example, one of the traitors was under the command of the japanese army to distribute food to the citizens while supplying some prostitutes to comfort the japanese army. On the one hand, he got food for the people to avoid starvation, and on the other hand, he was so worried about the rights of the japanese army, indirectly, that their aggression was rationalized. On the one hand, he brought a woman to the japanese army, and on the other hand, he protected himself from the japanese army using any pretext to bully women. One long, one good, one bad, how can you cover one side and just look at the other? The reality is complex, and often conflicts of interest occur, and sodomy and patriotism are not absolute 100 per cent good and evil. And it's not going to be much better to create a couple of near saints, faithful and successful idols to love, one-sidedly to blame the traitor. It's really important to see the real, complex, black and white dilemma behind it, and to see how the true patriotism works in it, so that the next generation really knows how to make a real contribution to the country. This is a valuable history, and this is a meaningful education. Liangwondo's " knowledge " is a book of time-table discussions, with one small piece of the story being published in newspapers and perhaps online. I don't know if it's because mr. Leung was born in hong kong, but it's always different when he talks about what i think is written by mainland journalists. While 90 per cent or more of the articles in the book are talking about hot spots in mainland china, the perspective of mr. Liang's observations and the language used make me feel different. He would stand in a way that no one else would notice, speak, reflect, appeal in a language that no one else would dare to say. What the book of knowledge brought me is that i stand in a more different and deeper perspective to deal with an event, a character, a society. Excavating, thinking about what is missing behind the social hotspots, but vitally important. Mr. Leung said in his own words: "i do realize that the original sin of talking about people in hong kong is not really a `slavery mentality', but rather a relatively superior space. My environment is more relaxed than that of many of my peers, i have more information than many dollars, i have less risk and i have less fear." so as far as i'm concerned about being a youth on the continent (or us), the book "knowledge" is really refreshing to see what we haven't noticed, what we journalists on the continent haven't talked about, the warning and reflection behind social hotspot events. The most impressive thing in the book is mr. Liang's talk about the events that i'm familiar with, because he made me notice the deeper, more substantive things behind the events that i know. And that's all i've never thought about. He's talking about the situation, and it really makes me feel like i've seen too little before. Even the vast majority of society is too shallow. Liang wendo also mentioned in his own order that one of his dreams was to hope that we could have independent thinking in society. And that is the very important point that i realized after reading knowledge。it is hoped that in the future we will be able to improve our ability to think independently and have an idea of our own
