Social software in the interior, after the initial scale boom of the web platform, has in recent years begun to become a mess. Following intense efforts by internet information regulators in the interior to counter rumours spread by the “big v” group, characterized by a huge number of fans, using twitter, a year ago a rapidly expanding twitter user group began to “replicate” the images seen by the then microblogging regulators: political rumours, rumors of violent terror, fraudulent marketing, pornographic gambling information, etc., “interacting” between the community of friends and the public, and the destructive power of its cumulative dissemination effects cannot be underestimated。
“some people use this platform to disseminate harmful information to the public that is harmful or illegal, seriously disrupts the order of dissemination and endangers the public interest”. There are indications that the punishment for the various rumours and sources of rumours that are being spread in the microclinical sphere will be “one step in the way”, focusing on the preservation of national security and social stability and the protection of the public interest。
Kill a back-to-back gun
As early as 27 may this year, the national office of information on the internet, together with the ministries of industry and information technology and public security, convened a special working meeting to organize a month-long campaign throughout the country to control mobile means of instantaneous communication, such as twitter, and to focus on combating violations in the public information dissemination services of instant communications。
The public was impressed by the disappearance of some “active” twitter public signs, some of which became cautious after recovery. Observers familiar with the media and concerned with the social media dissemination process stated that almost every topic of focus and public discourse in the interior, such as the situation in crimea, ukraine, the taiwan anti-wirding operation, the mh370 air crash, the issue of general elections in hong kong and related demonstrations, the chao and zhou yongkang have been able to see the spread of the “false” virus, represented by micro-circle relays, indicating that “one month's” special treatment has not met expectations. With the revival of some of the micro-intelligence public symbols disguised as “renewal” and their invisibility through technical means, accompanied by the expansion of the maximum number of micro-intelligence groups to a total of 500 people, the multiplicity of micro-intelligence groups and multiple intersections have created a multiplicity of mixed images。
Based on the success of the original campaign to combat the rumours of microblogging, internet information regulators in the interior need to start from the source, to clean up information in the microclinics, and to avoid the “hand-to-hand” habits of socialization based on the circle of friends that encourage the spread of irresponsible rumours. This potentially rapid norm-setting for the “point-to-point” transmission population for the purpose of corrective action is like killing a “back rifle”, meaning and effectiveness in pursuit of long-term control。
Proliferation of the evolution of “internalization”
In the light of the last major overhaul of the rumours of weibo, and in conjunction with the supreme people's court's definition of the death penalty for the transmission of 500 rumours, the public has become increasingly clear and committed to the possibility of a criminal conviction of the “probation” of strangers, but there is still no clear awareness of proliferation based on a group of obscurants within the circle of friends, and in the circle of personal obligating friends, the rumours of which are still “hand-in-hand” are still being transmitted by a large number of people。
The “internal” messages, based on the “best friends'” community, have also evolved into a true spread of rumours that are no less effective and instantaneous than microblogging fans' broadcasts of fans, and that the general public, apart from the professional media, has little professional capacity to verify the authenticity of information and describe it as reliable。
While “unpredicted” rumours are not motivated by the absorption of microblogging fans in the community of friends, efforts to play the role of “first-hand pick-up of novel information” have led to the involvement of most of the users of microbred letters in the subjective motivation of their producers。
Zhu chunyang, a professor at the faculty of journalism of the university of reformed university in shanghai, had summed up the common features of the media's misperceptions about the relationship of friends: it seemed exciting; it was inflammatory; it was very firm and largely centred around issues of concern; it did not indicate time; and there was no accurate source。
According to the source, the evidence available to the regulatory body indicates that the publisher of the subjective source of the rumours has a very precise public psychological capacity and that the content of the rumours of specific confidence is expressed at a very high level, with the information characters being published “without trace” in terms of length, mouth and words。
Responsible editor: zhang dei
[whispering information cellular client downloading]
