I speak of aircraft, air forces, air combat, with little or no comparison of parameters, without saying whether or not 20 can hit anything like f22 or f35. Much more talk is said about low-altitude cordon, ground attack. Attention to the warplanes has been focused mainly on the bombing of the ground, and less on air warfare。
Because air power is about bombing the ground。
The doctrine of airspace control was introduced by general ducher of italy. At that time, the plane had just appeared, and many people still saw it as a toy and a sport. But dukh discovered the potential of the aircraft, which was considered to be the main cause of the future war, and offered the means of its use:
Thousands of aircraft bombed enemy cities, noting that it was civilians, factories, infrastructure. By bombing, the enemy was struck from its roots, killing the population and destroying the productive capacity. The lack of a war-fighting, productive population and weapons of combat can also defeat the will of the enemy to resist. The second was the bombing of the enemy, which was destroyed directly on the ground by aircraft。
At the heart of air power is the bombing of the ground. Air warfare is auxiliary, either to ensure that its own air force can bomb the enemy or to prevent it from being bombed by enemy aircraft。
This is the route that the united states air force has been following since the first world war. This is the case in tokyo, japan, and cologne, germany. The world war has taken its toll on cities and civilians. Like the gulf war, we can step back and just blow up the army. As we mentioned in the previous article, the war in kosovo, with the very good covertness of the serbian army and the minimal damage caused by nato bombings, has been maintained. It was only when nato was in a hurry that it began to bomb civilian targets that serbia surrendered。
The western german army during the second world war, and the iraqi army during the gulf war, had all experienced the formation of sophisticated armoured forces to the front, and had been blown up by united states aircraft until local forces had been maimed。
The concept of air power is to draw the air force out to fight independently and to dominate the war. So it says the u. S. Is taking an empty route. Russia and russia are mainland countries, and even at the best of times, the air force is the sidekick of the army. The russian federation followed the land rights route and the aircraft attacked the city with tanks。
The independent air force, which destroys enemy cities, industrial centres and economic centres by dropping bombs on thousands of planes, directly destroys enemy armies and directly decides on the victory of war, has itself fought a war of 77888, making the army a sidekick, which is called empty power。
In the russian-ukrainian war, three planes from russia today and two from ukraine tomorrow are just a little bit of a land war。
The air strikes the city, the army understands. But the best way to hit the enemy's air force is to destroy it on the ground. No empty fight, no flying. Like the middle east war, the israeli air force blew up arab warplanes at the airport in the morning。
A proactive attack to destroy the enemy's air force on the ground is the best mode of air warfare without air fighting。
Almost without loss, the enemy could easily be wiped out. It's easy to pick up a few of them that fly sometimes. Hundreds of fighter fighters from both sides fought in the air and looked spectacular, which was actually the worst situation. It's like a army trench。
Air rights, air warfare, the essence of the aircraft is being bombed。
The core of air control is bombers, which also include tactical bombers. The responsibility of the fighters is to protect the bombers from the task。
An air force with thousands of aircraft, including a large number of sophisticated bombers, is valuable. If an air force is mostly a fighter jet, the fact that the bombers are few and backward means that its primary duty is to defend itself against the presence of another air force。
It is the best way to destroy an opponent on the ground by aircraft, not one。
The enemy must therefore be prepared, and now the major equipment for the aircraft is radar. The aircraft, on the other hand, now rely on essentially two tactics: covert and low-altitude cordon. Invisible designs are designed to reduce radar detection distances, and low-altitude surprises are designed to avoid radar detection using earth curvature。
1. Invisible and low-altitude cordon to avoid radar detection。
2. Avoiding radar detection will make it to the top of the enemy。
3. It is only at the top of the enemy that the bomb can be dropped and the enemy destroyed on the ground。
4. Destroying the enemy on the ground is the best way to use the aircraft。
5. To use the aircraft's greatest advantage, it is to make a direct decision on the success of the war, which is called air power. That's what makes it worthwhile。
That is why i always refer to attacks on the ground, low-altitude raids, invisibility and less air warfare. Precautionary, ground-to-ground attacks are offensive, proactive and the best use of aircraft. Destroying enemy aircraft as far as possible on the ground is a small proportion of the air battle that can take off. Or to intercept an enemy aircraft from an attack and to fight in the air. In peacetime, the aircraft of the two countries fight along the border and off the coast。
When it comes to air rights, aircraft must be much more important。
It is common to compare su-su 57 with f35 and to draw even more advanced conclusions than f35 and f20. It's useless. The f35 has built thousands, the united states forces themselves expect 3,000, and allies buy another 3,000. There are hundreds of them now。
Su57? Three, five, no use. Too little, the impact on the war is completely negligible. There's nothing to do in ukraine, especially with other powerful air forces. Some people are waking up with false news about the shooting down of a soviet warplane with su 57 million kilometres away. No impact。
So i rarely compare the parameters with 20, f35 and sue 57, so i guess. Four and five can't fight, 20 and f35 are five. There's no difference. There's no difference. It depends on who's strong and who's weak and who's weak. Four-to-fives do not solve the problem by number and performance。
In the last decade, many people have been blinded to the line: 20 is enough for 200, and it is impossible to produce too much。
Will you shut up now
It's almost 200 now, isn't it time to stop? The fact that the united states built 6,000 f35s and china built 200 shafts means nothing to develop and equip. I can't beat them anyway. Why spend money? Do you understand
Not only is the aircraft of good quality but it is much more numerous. Sufficient quantity is useful and useful is called air power。
Today there are three russian planes, two ukrainians, one more russian than ukraine, and russia has air control ... Can we not stop? Too few planes, the influence of war is negligible, it's useless, it's useless
