This is mirror water moon
If you want to score high points, you can't use a dead end to find a methodical solution to the problem. Many candidates fail to get a 60-point card, the core reason being the lack of a modular focus: a sense of speech, a judgment of deadness, time-consuming calculations, accumulation of common sense blindness and, ultimately, a loss of time and high marks. It operates four core modules (spoken/judgmental/digital/common sense), each with a logic of points, some with skills, some with accumulation, some with reliance, some with a method of reliance, this super-detailed method of measuring modules, from core points of view, problem resolution, pit avoidance points to brushing techniques, hand in hand to teach you how to break the module shortboards, so that the correctness rate rises by 80% +, and achieves high scores on the field
I. Interpretation and expression of words: farewell answers, skill-based scores, 85 % correct +
Words are understood as the basic module for measuring points, with the highest percentage of subjects (20-40 in the national examination), which appears to be linguistically sound, with mastery of the core method of “language analysis + option analysis” and quick choice of answers。
Core scoring techniques
1. Snippet reading: first looking at the question, then reading the material, picking the key word answers
- adjudication of the subject (general summary/intentional judgement/understanding, etc.) and reading of the material with questions to avoid blind reading
- material attachment (turn/causal/column), high frequency (hf), first sentence, direct orientation of the subject, intended to give priority to the “response line” (material questions)
- the method of matching material with options for the interpretation of details avoids the three main traps of “stolen concepts, absolute expressions, non-existent”。
2. Logical fill-out: speech analysis is predominant and terms accumulate to complement
- analysis of the context, search for hints (links, explanatory statements, emotional colours) and determination of the semantic, emotional, matching requirements of the spaces before looking at options
- the combination of synonyms, emotional colours, semantics, such as “deprivation” of responsibility, the justification of “pivot”, the meaning of “continuously contrary”, and the meaning of “largely different”
- accumulation of high-frequency speech (e. G., the south, the south, fish, complementarities) to capture meaning and use the scenes to avoid vindictiveness。
Language expression: capture "consistent logic", skeletal sequence and connection
- sorting of statements: first, look at the first sentence of the option (exclusion of the verb, opening of the second half of the associated word), then look for bundled information (responding to the verb, connection, consistency of subject), and finally verify
- interconnection: the line starts with the header, starts with the header, starts with the middle, ends with the header, and ends with the subject。
Points for brushing and hole avoidance
- 30-40 questions per day, focusing on "quick read + tactical applications" and avoiding verbatim reading, each within 50 seconds
- refusal to “speech questions”, even if chosen correctly, to test them with skills and to develop a solution
- collapse the wrong subject to indicate the cause of the error (technology does not/do not know/negative) and repeat the error of the high frequency。
Ii. Judicial election: study + scientific application, treatment hole 80%
It is the fastest-scaled module (30-40 questions in the national examination) with fixed and well-sequenced features, with “secret killing” being the key to a split, as long as the pattern of problem resolution is kept in mind。
Core scoring techniques
Graphical reasoning: keeping track, fast positioning, seconding answers
- checking in order of the "relationship patterns (symmetry, curves, openings), the quantitative patterns (point-line agglomerations), the location patterns (trawling, rotating, flipping), the patterns of the style patterns (twice, computing), the special patterns (functional elements, space re-engineering)" and avoiding blind test patterns
- focus on the hf test: symmetrically symmetrical axis direction/quantity/franchisements, detailing of the quantitative test (same, maximum face), drawing of the line (a characterization)
- space re-engineering: using relative, adjoining techniques (hourwise, arrow, public edge) without spatial imagination, to solve squares/quadrilateral folds。
Definition of judgement: capture of keywords, comparison of options, selection of merit
- the key words of the subject matter, object, manner, purpose, cause, result, etc., are marked with a pencil
- the option of comparing keywords on a case-by-case basis, with the absence of a keyword directly excluded, without the need to address the whole meaning and avoid overinterpretation
- the question of which definition should be asked first, and then the issue of targeted analysis, saving time。
3. Analogic reasoning: mastering the logic, avoiding the trap, 90% +
- the four main logics of the core: external relations (symmetry, parallelism, inclusion, cross-section), inner relationships (attributions, conditions, causes and consequences), grammar relations (principal name, guest, bias), semantic relations (nearness, opposite, metaphorical symbols)
- uncertain options are encountered, with a meta-validation method, consistent preferences
- avoiding pitfalls: parallel relationships are contradictory (non-a or b) and objections (other), inclusive relationships are divided (a is b) and constituent (a is b)。
4. Logical judgement: the memory formula + mastery of the problem and focus on the argument
- translation reasoning: the formula for translation of logically related words (if any, push forward; only talent, push forward) and the rule of reasoning (negative equivalents, colloquial reasoning) and simplistic reasoning
- strengthening/degrading the case: this is the main issue - strengthening/degrading the case: this is a focused theme, looking at arguments and arguments before looking at options, strengthening the preferred “bridges/necessary conditions/positive examples” and weakening the preferred “dismantling/negative arguments/reverse examples” with the strongest options directly addressing the arguments
- true and false reasoning: looking for a contradiction, looking around the contradiction, fast-tracking the answer。
Points for brushing and hole avoidance
- 30-40 questions per day, with a separate exercise in graphic reasoning, focusing on "sequence rapid positioning" and other "keyword extraction+technology applications"
- patterns do not have to be remembered, and by encapsulation they create a conditional reflection, and when you see a feature map, you think of the corresponding pattern
- definition of judgement to avoid “excessive interpretation”, to select the answer strictly by keyword, and analogy to avoid “perception”。
Iii. Quantitative relations: abandoning difficult problems, building the foundation of the main attack, easily taking 70 per cent of the score, without delay
Quantitative relationships are the most easily abandoned modules for measurement, but the value of the product is extremely high, and it is not necessary to deal with all the questions, but to focus on the basics and fast-track problem resolution techniques, and to get 70 per cent of the scores, far above the majority of candidates。
Core scoring techniques
1. Selecting the cross-problem, abandoning the dilemma, the main attack base
- focusing on basic topics such as engineering issues, itinerary issues, profit issues, tolerance issues, and multiplication, age and geometry issues, which are clear and simple, accounting for more than 70 per cent of the quantitative issues
- problems (e. G., clustering complex issues, probabilistic difficulties, complex itineraries) are simply abandoned, with no death on the examination floor and time saved for other modules。
2. Acquiring rapid problem resolution techniques without hard counting
- substitute exclusion: a question applicable to age, the difference, the single data of the option, with the option being taken to the top and the eligible direct selection
- value method: applicable to engineering, itinerary, profit, special value for unknown amounts (e. G. 1, 100), simplified calculation
- numerical feature method: use of myths, multiples, allocatives, rapid exclusion of error options, such as "multiple relationships" with the difference, and direct seconds。
3. Note core formula, directly applied
- validation of the underlying core formulae (e. G. Engineering issues: work volume = work efficiency x time; profit issues: profit = sales price – cost, profit margin = profit/cost) and the direct application of the subject to the formula without extrapolation。
Points for brushing and hole avoidance
- painting of 10-15 basic features per day, with emphasis on "thematic identification + formula application + techniques " , each within one minute
- quantities at the examination stage are at the end, first done, not directly covered and not wasted
- avoiding the “hard end”, learning to solve problems quickly with skills, measuring quantitative relationships without taking into account computational abilities, and examining problems。
Data analysis: measurement of the “biggers”, familiarization formula + speed calculation, correct rate 90% +
Data analysis is the most easy module for measurement (20 questions in the national examination), which appears to have a large number of data and a large number of calculations, but is based on fixed and skillful considerations, and can achieve “sec count” if the formula is well documented and calculated。
Core scoring techniques
1. Memorize the core formula and be well informed
- focus on the core formulas for the seven main considerations, such as growth = current-base period = base period x growth rate = current x growth rate/(1+ growth rate), base period weight = (part-base period/total base period) = (current period weight x (1+ overall growth rate))/ (1+ partial growth rate)
- the formula does not have to be written down, it creates a conditional reflection by encapsulation。
2. Rapid search, precise positioning
- read the subject first, and circle the key words (time, subject, point of view) and then find the corresponding data in the material and avoid blind reading
- materials are divided into text, tables, graphics, text that captures the subject matter, time, keyword, table/graph header, unit, legend, rapid location data。
3. Practice in fast-calculation techniques and rejection of actuarial
- cut-off: nucleus accelerator techniques, applicable to all calculator types, determination of the number of transpositions based on the options gap (two large and three small), and rapid calculation
- centuries: applied to the calculation of growth volumes by converting growth rates into fractions (e. G. 1/6≈16. 7%, 1/7≈14. 3%), growth = current period/(n+1), reduction = current period/(n-1), second answer
- score comparison method: applies to weight, average comparison, with no actuarial basis for rapid comparison by “molecule denominator vs. Large-symmetric multiplication/discount method”。
Avoiding common traps and ensuring correct rates
- attention to time traps (base period/current period, homogeneity/ring ratio), unit traps (billions, %/per 1,000), range traps (national/provincial, cumulative/month)
- when looking at an option, take care of the scale and avoid the correct calculation but the wrong grade。
Points for brushing and hole avoidance
- 2-3 data analysis sets (20 questions) per day, strict timing (one set within 25 minutes) and “figure speed + formula application + speed calculation techniques”
- collapse the wrong subject and indicate the cause of the error (failure of formulas/miscounting error/slowness/falling trap) and repeat the high frequency trap
- do not pursue “actuarial”, and the analysis of measurements is based on quick-calculation capabilities, not computational capabilities, and learn to estimate。
V. Generalization of modules for measuring: this is easy to measure 70+
1. Clarity in response order, optimizing time allocation
- recommended generic response order: common sense to judge words to understand the quantitative relationship between reasoning and analysis of data, making simple and easy-to-specify modules before making them difficult to avoid wasting time in the first half
- time allocation (120 minutes of the national examination): 10 minutes of common sense, 35 minutes of speech, 35 minutes of judgement, 25 minutes of information, 10 minutes of quantity, 5 minutes of reply cards, strictly time-bound answers, and constant jumps。
2. Spelling as a genuine core, rejecting simulations
- only 10 years of examination in the state examination/target province, where the subject matter is most relevant to the examination, and where the quality of the mock-ups is uneven and can be misleading
- specialized brushes and swipes, special swipes for the basic stage, reinforcements of the swipes for the period, and sprinting of the stylish for the period。
3. Misdirection is the key to the score
- each error is marked by the cause of the error, the point of reference, the technique of solving the problem, which is repeated once a week, which summarizes the common pattern and avoids repetition
- use of the error book to indicate the source of the subject (e. G. Question 15 of the 2024 national examination) to save time。
4. Use of fragmentation time, accumulation of common sense and high frequency examinations points
- accumulation of common sense: use of morning-rise, commuting hours to view high-frequency tests such as politics, law, technology, history and so forth, to focus on the popular daily newspaper, xinhua's current political hotspots and to draw 50 common sense questions a day
- high frequency (hf) test points: hf tests and techniques for speech, judgement, quantification, are written in notes, debrisation time is repeated and muscle memory is formed。
5. Simulation of the examination and development of the test habit
- one or two sets of fact sheets per week, which are strictly timed in accordance with the examination time, and which are used as flashcards to fully restore the examination process
- learn to “opportunify” and not “do all things” when it comes to problems in the examination field, skipping them and ensuring that all the questions that are made are given points。
Vi. Monitoring the priority and target accuracy of the modules
The line points are to be divided into the main points, prepared on a priority basis, and time is to be spent on blades, with a clear target correctness rate and targeted promotion:
1. Preparative priority: analysis of information > diagnosis > interpretation of words > quantitative relationship > common sense judgement, first of which will be difficult to attack fast, correct modules
2. Target correctness rate: 90 per cent analysis of information, 80 per cent reasoning, 80 per cent interpretation, 70 per cent quantification, 60 per cent common sense, 60 per cent assessment, based on this goal, easy to measure 70 per cent and sprint 80 per cent。
The test is never about “dying hard backs” and “doing speeds”, but rather about problem solving and time control. Words understand the sense of farewell, score by technique, judge the reasoning of routines, select the second answer, give up the problem, base the main attack, analyze well-written formulas, master speed calculations, and judge the accumulation of fragmentation and capture of high frequency. With this technique to break through the module panel one by one, and then develop its own response rhythm by brushing it up, it's easy to break 70+, even 80+, and lay a solid foundation for the examination to land
I'm mirror water moon. I'm focused on my job. Which module do you measure the weakest? What is the correct rate? Leave a message from the comment section, share points, attack the short board。
#systeming modules ready for examination # look
