It's not meant to cover the door, it's not for buddha. Buddha only guides us on how to improve life, but real practice depends on itself, and practice cannot fail to provide proper guidance, which needs to start with the adaptation of ideas. Different perceptions create different mindsets and produce different behaviours, which in turn perpetuate the respective mindsets, which are mutually reinforcing。
If we do not think of buddha with the right heart, even if it does, it has nothing to do with practice, because the nature of the act has been determined at the beginning of the heart. So, at the heart of the practice is the development of decency, which requires special attention. What kind of thoughts we have, what kind of future we have。
The same is true of buddha: we need to know the importance of it and to know how to read it correctly and effectively. These conditions are necessary to be proportionate and effective. With quality, we're gonna need volume. The rationale behind the practice is to get rid of mistakes and to repeat them correctly, which take place hundreds of times and tens of thousands of times, consolidating the positive force. If quality is good, but without quantitative assurance, and the mind is too large to be the main force for confrontation, then what ultimately dominates our lives remains a paranoia rather than a desire。
Buddha's wisdom, which guides us in making the right choices for the future, is what buddha has given us. Shall we suffer or be happy? Return or release? If it continues along the lines of an inherent chain of practice, the result must be a return. If life is to be freed, it is necessary to build a sense of reconciliation. Whether or not a door to law is to be built, there is a basic awareness that life is uncertain, that it is bitter, that it is true that there is no merit in the sanbao, and that confidence is created. These ideas have a direct bearing on how much effect the law can have in our lives. The buddha of namo
