According to yunnan regulatory information, recently the yunnan market supervision authority published a typical case of intellectual property administrative enforcement in 2025. The published cases, which covered areas such as patent infringement, trademark infringement and the fraudulent use of geographical indications, demonstrated the enforcement results of market regulators in combating intellectual property abuse。
Administrative decision on the patent tort dispute over the appearance of the “package box” design
In may 2025, the dlr market supervisory authority issued an administrative decision on a patent-infringement dispute on the basis of a patent holder's request. It has been found that the products of the “package box” produced and sold by the requested person without authorization fall within the scope of patent protection in question and constitute patent infringement. The board ordered the requested person, in accordance with the law, to cease the violation immediately。
Ii. Investigation of the investigation of instruments of the registration of a destruction case
In march 2025, an inspection by the market supervision authority of biang county in pyalaya found that a printing centre had not been authorized to design and print “totem” for others without verifying the authorization documents. The act was in violation of the relevant legislation, and the market regulator imposed administrative penalties on the persons concerned in accordance with the law。
Zwz case
In may 2025, on the basis of a report, the market supervision authority of yukre city found that a trade company, a trade company, had sold the axes of a false “zwz” registered trademark. The act constitutes a violation of the right to register trademarks, and the regulatory authority of the market imposes administrative penalties on the parties in accordance with the law。
Iv. Confidential violations of the right to registration of drugs case
In january 2025, an inspection by the yang zonghai landscape division of the kunming city market supervisory authority found that a food company had printed a pattern similar to the registered trademark on its production of sashimi sauce and that the product category was similar to that of trademark rights holders. This act constitutes a trademark violation and the market regulator imposes administrative penalties on the parties in accordance with the law。
V. Confidential violations of the right to registration of “gold” case
In april 2025, the market supervision office of yongdee county, in the city of qin, seized an overpack at a feed shop with a “red” series of feeds that were highly similar to the “gold” registered trademark. Although the parties held a series of patent certificates for the design of appearance, their sales constituted trademark infringement and the market regulator imposed administrative penalties in accordance with the law。
Vi. Investigation of the approach of the registration of the registration of obligations case
In november 2024, the market regulatory authority of the city of zhenghong city, western bizona county, was found to have violated the right to register the trademarks of the “cow mount” by buying and selling them over the internet without filing a relevant registration. This act constitutes a trademark violation and the market regulator imposes administrative penalties on the parties in accordance with the law。
Vii. Confidential context of the transfer of the stocks
In august 2025, the dijing county market supervisory authority seized goods suspected of fraudulently certifying trademarks with the “shangri lazone” geographical sign. The person concerned was found to have printed the geographical sign on the packaging of the goods without the permission of the trademark holder. The act constitutes the fraudulent identification of a trademark by geographical indications, and the regulatory authority of the market imposes administrative penalties on the parties in accordance with the law。
