And as you may have noticed, mobile phone manufacturers are adjusting their propaganda strategy: instead of focusing on the depth and thinking behind the sound, they are beginning to play personalized images。
The most representative of these are the “televisions” launched on the iphone 16 series, the new master model on the find x8 ultra, the “personal color cards” on the pura 80 series, and the parameters on the mi15 ultra 15 ... They give users a more “thousand-one” expression in the original video style。
In addition to adding more variables to mobile phone images, these parameters have become a kind of negotiation and sharing of content in circles, using each other’s shared personalized parameters, which are perceived as being used to significantly raise the level of photographing, or to teach others how to use them, thereby making them attractive to the outside world and, in turn, reinforcing the social properties of mobile phones。
And the unwitting ones seem to be starting to make money in circles. Raytech wandered around with a bunch of little red books and accidentally found some people who bought these mobile phones to take pictures of the coloring parameters and shared their "perfect pictures." used to say camera parameters, late filter parameters, and sound, which cost professionals, but does the wind blow to a mobile phone image mean much more? Iq tax
And the story begins with a little bit of a tumbling post。
50 bucks to get the iphone picture clearer
So here's the thing: i saw a guy on the internet spitting on iphone 16 pro when i was doing a little red book, saying the original camera took a picture of "super incoherent." we don't know if it's really "super incoherent" because this guy didn't send a picture of him using iphone 16 pro at all, but a simple one。
Many internet users, like they found the key word, came to take photos of the iphone, and the exact same “clearly”, as if the iphone would not be a powerful response. In addition, most commentators refer to one thing, the style of the palette that they want, or film simulations, or parameters such as a sense of film, a sense of excellence, and the colour orientation of the palette。
(photo from mine technology)
What makes me more concerned is that the best-responding, highest-approached internet friend, who said that he had bought “special parameters” for $50, and that the pictures were clear. In response to the comments below, which i did not expect, all the voices of questioning and spitting were the ones that felt worthless for his $50. But he just said, "i'm happy," "i'm lazy," and he wanted to prove that the $50 was worth it。
Looking at his live drawings, he did have good colours, with dark details kept, clarity not evaluated, since images shared on the platform were largely compressed and of little reference value. The reason for the high level of clarity in his view was probably the use of brighter colour parameters, which, at the technical level, did not improve the clarity of the photographs, which were linked to camera sensory abilities, lens quality and software algorithms, and which only functioned as a modulation。
(photo from mine technology)
The reason why netizens feel worthless for his 50 bucks is also simple: a little red book searching for "iphone tuning" and sharing a number of free-of-charge coloring programs, with parameters set in an open and transparent manner, style chosen by all, is almost a “industrial chain” that can no longer be mature enough, and users can achieve the same filter effect by simply taking the parameter "copying". The video component has been extended to a large number of free lut programmes, which are basically free of charge。
Raytech searched and found that there were some sellers selling this iphone-colored parameter, and that there were similar products on a second-hand platform at a price ranging from a few cents to nine dollars, which included more than 30 filter parameters for human appearances, natural wind, city street shoots and special scenes, together with an adjustment table for the parameters, “baby-sitter” classes, but the unit price of the product was much lower than the $50 mentioned by the internet member, although the browse did not seem to open up much. Unfortunately, mine technology is not connected to the guy who buys the parameters, and it's not known what's behind it。
(photo from mine technology)
It must be denied that mobile phone “telescopes” and preset features have given users a great deal of playability to far beyond fixed video programming, greatly stimulating their own hands-on abilities. But these are essentially simple parameters, and there is no “business secret” and it's a little unwise to make money, because most internet users are sober。
It's better to pay for your phone to take pictures? Personal cameras are in business
It does not appear to be a particularly sensible payment act and can be seen as a phenomenon of individual cameras。
In fact, before self-defined modulations like iphone come out, you'll have to pay for some personalized photography and filters. Users who are used to iphone are likely to have nomos, butter cameras, dazz cameras, huji, fimo etc. On their mobile phones, and even professional image brands。
These apps can be understood as third-party “filter libraries”, which is an extension of the iphone photo function, with its iphone camera system open to developers and the three-party apps directly using iphone's image system to capture higher-quality pictures。
The tripartite camera app usually provides presets such as multiple film simulations, as well as a set of games similar to its palettes, and there is a great deal of teaching and parameters in the little red book。
By the way, the triple camera app isn't all for free, for example, the nomo camera costs about $140 a year, and some filters in the dazz camera also need to be unlocked at a fee, so little red books and electrical platforms can find the relevant membership account numbers, filtering packages。
And then you'll learn to use it. In order to do it faster, some third-party camera app needs a more systematic tutorial and buy it online. And the android camp is not missing, except for the three-way camera app, mentioned above, which is a google camera with a long-sung ring. The camera app is a better-modified configuration, some of which need to be bought。
For camera games, i believe that everyone has paid more or less a price. After all, in the past, mobile phone images were mainly considered to be “pornable” and “good shot” and drilled for software and hardware synergies and scene recognition, with little consideration given to users’ own needs for stylish photography (image brand names can also be counted as a personalized exploration), leaving users who do not like the original camera with no choice but to find a triple camera, app, or even to spend money。
Mobile phone images have changed, individualized games have been filled in, film simulators have a lot of self-defined games, and late-stage regulation has been unprecedented, and manufacturers have helped us to think about the game, reducing the dependency of the three apps and saving the cost。
(photo from thunder technology)
Besides, the personal color of a mobile phone image is that of a few parameters, not a tuner for the sound, and the color scheme's “saturation” on the internet, which is not necessary to buy “special parameters” at all, is better than to buy some photographic books to increase theoretical knowledge of photography。
But if you really feel that the color parameters that you paid for are more professional, i can only respect and bless。
The palette is popular, paid for color, but not necessary
In the case of the iphone, where mobile phone users do not like the original camera, which is “too real”, is thin, has no personality, and apple himself probably has no intention of adjusting its own image to meet the demands of domestic mobile phone users。
As a result, the presence of a third party, app, filled the personalization gap of the original camera and even bought a variety of filters at any cost, even in the era of seemingly professional colour packs. Andre's camp is the same, even if it's about to get thrown into the iq tax。
From a user's point of view, it is certain that the newer game will be pursued. So, even with the old machine, which is already “exhausted”, we hope that mobile phone manufacturers will be able to decentralize the new image function as much as possible, including these individualized colors。
Fortunately, mobile phone manufacturers do, and while it is inevitable that some users are willing to spend money to support higher levels of emotional value, at least the threshold of personalized images can be lowered sufficiently low, rather than the filters that need to be bought. The pura 80-series individual colours can also be integrated into a series of codes, and direct import codes can get colour solutions without a single parameter adjustment。
As for this highly defined age of mobile phone images, whether we pay for professional colours or not, the answer is completely unnecessary. If we want to buy it, mine technology borrows a 50-dollar internet friend who buys “special parameters”, which is, “i pay my satisfaction”。
