On 17 june, the 2023 ridge south intellectual property litigation conference was organized by the guangzhou city bar association and the guangdong province association for the advancement of knowledge economic development。
The vice-president of the centre for intellectual property research of guangdong province, the former vice-president of the department of intellectual property rights, yuan yu, the president of the institute of intellectual property studies of guangdong province, the chairman of the guangzhou institute of intellectual property studies and research council of guangzhou, the director of the centre for intellectual property protection of guangzhou, the deputy director of the judicial department of white cloud region of guangzhou city, the president of the centre for the promotion of intellectual economic development of guangdong province, liu xiaojun, the vice-president of the guangzhou city bar association, as well as several heads of the intellectual property industry, experts, academics, litigation and business representatives, nearly 300 participants attended the congress。
Opening ceremony
Liu xiaojun stated that this year marks the thirtieth anniversary of the deepening of the reform of the bar in guangzhou and the thirty-fifth anniversary of the establishment of the guangzhou city bar association. He noted that the congress had been in operation for seven consecutive years with the aim of analysing current trends in intellectual property litigation, raising the level of legalization of intellectual property protection and providing an important support for the acceleration of the construction of a world-class gulf of port-au-prince。
Yuan yuen has stated that the powerful must be strong in their economy, strong in technology, strong in intellectual property, and strong in intellectual property. It is significant that intellectual property rights are strong and that the holding of intellectual property litigation conferences is a powerful initiative。
According to guan yonghong, the case study is an important exercise in litigation and is an intuitive, concrete, lively and direct material. The advancement of the rule of law as a whole through case-by-case analysis and research is of irreplaceable value and significance for the continued upgrading of the capacity of intellectual property lawyers and the quality of legal trials。
According to gu qi, the litigation congress was an overview of the state of intellectual property litigation in the previous year's ridge south and a good review of typical cases in the previous year's spring south ipr litigation, as well as an effective platform for examining intellectual property litigation practices together. He indicated that the host of the conference would take practical action to promote an overall increase in the level of intellectual property litigation in the south of the ridge。
At the conference, the award ceremony was held for the “sexual case of southern intellectual property litigation 2022” and the “sexual case of southern intellectual property litigation 2022” and the “sexual team of southern intellectual property litigation 2022” received awards in 30 cases, 10 cases of foreign involvement and 13 teams of excellence。
The results of the “excellent cases” competition were published by liu xiao jun and the medals were awarded by chenghua, director of the patent law professional commission of the guangzhou city bar association, liu yanxie, director of the fair trade law professional commission, and tanzig, director of the copyright law professional commission. The medal “excellent foreign case” was presented by dong yidong, director of the trademark legal professional committee of the guangzhou city bar association. The award of the “team of excellence” was presented by guo chiji, president and vice-president of the association for the advancement of knowledge and economic development of guangdong province. The selection and award of awards for litigation has further served as a guide, model and lead for typical cases of intellectual property and has been instrumental in raising professional standards in the field of intellectual property litigation in our province. After seven years of development, the competition has become an influential brand in the field of intellectual property in the ridge south。
Zoubo, secretary-general of the guangdong society for the advancement of knowledge economic development, issued commemorative tablets to guangdong and the law firm of guangdong, which co-operated with the general assembly, the law firm of zhuangzhou, the law firm of guangdong, the law firm of hen riang, and the original information technology company, ion yiang (gangdong)。
Keynote address
A total of 10 leading experts from various aspects of intellectual property litigation were invited to give keynote addresses。
Zhang zhang, co-founder and co-founder of zhang zhang zhang, vice-president of the intellectual property division of the supreme people's court of guangdong province, judge zhou zhang, judge of the guangzhou internet court, judge zhou zian, judge of the haijo district people's court of guangzhou, judge chen ziao zhang of the people's court of guangzhou, judge of the intellectual property court of guangzhou, judge zhang zhang zhang, deputy director of the professional committee for copyright law of guangdong and law of the guangdong city bar association of guangzhou, judge wang zhang zheng zhengyang, president of the eastern institute of negotiations of guangdong province, and general manager of the shanghai free patent evaluation co. Ltd., respectively, made presentations on the basis of the analysis and calculation of the “imperial model for legal protection of intellectual property claims” “the practical strengthening of the technical contribution of intellectual property protection” to the “intellectorial protection of the “invenue” case。
Reports on intellectual property litigation
The 2023 spring south intellectual property litigation conference was held in the same venue and 12 award-winning lawyers shared cases in the four fields of trademarks, anti-improper competition, copyright and patents。
On the sharing of trademarks and points of appreciation, zhang hong hing hing, a lawyer at guangdong trianghua, shared “an administrative dispute between the national intellectual property agency, the third person, min-jin industries ltd. And bopis co. Ltd. Of foshan city concerning the annulment of the `bopis first class' trademark”, and xu zhihua, a lawyer at guangdong chusheng law office, shared “an administrative dispute concerning the invalidation of the `ninman and tu' trademarks in guangzhou city and the `ninman' of guangzhou city, a trade company”. The director of the trademark legal profession committee of the guangzhou city bar association, dong yidong, made a detailed evaluation of three trademark cases。
In the context of the sharing of anti-improper competition cases and points of appreciation, lawyers from guangzhou law office in beijing (long an) shared “an unfair competition dispute between teng seng seng shenzhen ltd., shenzhen city, a computer system ltd. V. Cheng city, a technology company in charge of a city, chengdu, a technology company in the field of information and technology in guangzhou”, guangdong hen-jin law office's executive partner, qui bin, “an unfair competition dispute involving a make-up trade firm (shanghai) ltd. V. A make-up company in guangzhou”, and hossheng law office in beijing, “an unfair competition dispute between montblan singi limited ltd., germany v. Guangzhou city, a writing firm, a gift pen factory, a trademark violation and an improper competition case”. Liu yanxi, director of the legal profession committee on fair trade of the guangzhou city bar association, evaluated these three anti-improper competition cases。
On the sharing of copyright cases and points of appreciation, zhang zhao, senior partner of the beijing city law office, shared “shanghai-technology network ltd. V. Holgosman-man, shenzhen-technology valley ltd., shenzhen-technology company ltd., guangzhou-per-technology network ltd.”, and yao xiaocheng, a lawyer of the hong kong-cwan khmer law office, shared “associate from guangzhou-tao-tai food company ltd., guangzhou-kuan-kuan sugar network science and technology ltd. (named black-truck services ltd.) and guangzhou-shin-sy network science and technology ltd.,” and xu zongyu, a lawyer from guangdong-hong-hong-hong-hong-cai, a company with limited liability for energy beves in austria. The director of the professional committee on copyright law of the guangzhou city bar association, tanzu, assessed the above three copyright cases。
In the context of patent case-sharing and point-to-point reviews, hong kong hong kong house of attorneys shared “the dispute over liability for damages arising out of maliciously filed intellectual property suits by guangdong kapeeda electronics and technology co. Ltd. V. Business investment ltd., east china city, shenzhen city, and plastics and plastics co. Ltd.”, and xiao woo-yan, guangdong triang, attorney-general of china, shared “the administrative dispute concerning the invalidity of patent rights in the invention of an `electro-cycling' by one of the national intellectual property boards”, guangdong guang and zhou jin-fu, attorney-general of guangdong and law co. Zou jin-fu shared a dispute over the infringement of patent rights in inventions between porte (east) plastics co. Ltd. And the united states company for aichi dishon. The director of the professional committee on patent law of the guangzhou city bar association, cheng hua, conducted a review of three patent cases, and he also chaired the presentation。
